PROFESSOR: How is my incest different than Homosexuality?

[decocker 7,198]

It's quite simple to create a consistent, objective, non-recursive definition of gender.

it is? how so?

[mota bhai 2,675]

Good luck, SMR.

[JohnR! 5,495]

But gender is completely different. It's quite simple to create a consistent, objective, non-recursive definition of gender.

In the context of incest, which is the subject of this topic, gender is immaterial.

[SMR 368]

it is? how so?

Chromosomes.

[mota bhai 2,675]

Chromosomes.

She knew you were going to say that and is now going to swoop in for the kill.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Chromosomes.

What about children born with undifferentiated sexual organs?

http://www.chw.org/display/PPF/DocID/22620/Nav/1/router.asp

[mota bhai 2,675]

It appears she has sent in her right-hand man instead. You've been deemed unworthy of the Queen Bee.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

It appears she has sent in her right-hand man instead. You've been deemed unworthy of the Queen Bee.

I used to read too much, but I am better now.

[decocker 7,198]

Chromosomes.

quite simple, boy or girl. chromosomes tag it. there is no room for abnormality. hormones have no baring. people must be classified either/or.

whatever.

It appears she has sent in her right-hand man instead. You've been deemed unworthy of the Queen Bee.

was never a lil kim fan.

[SMR 368]

quite simple, boy or girl. chromosomes tag it. there is no room for abnormality. hormones have no baring. people must be classified either/or.

whatever.

What's your point? Do you disagree?

[mota bhai 2,675]

What's your point? Do you disagree?

Let me clue you in to what libs like val believe.

Gender doesn't exist. We're all a little male and a little female, our external (and internal) physical stuff is just one (small..unless you're Eric) part of the picture.

[decocker 7,198]

What's your point? Do you disagree?

my point? it isn't "quite simple" to define.

[SMR 368]

my point? it isn't "quite simple" to define.

It's not difficult to determine what chromosomes a person has. Those with a Y chromosome are male. Those without one are female. That's fairly simple to me.

Obviously you can try to complicate it if you want to. Sort of like if I ask you how tall you are. It's a simple question that has a simple answer. If you want, you can go on about the shoes you're wearing, the time of day, how tall you used to be, how tall your relatives are, what you think the ideal height is, what you think the average height is, how you might become a paraplegic at some point, what your birth weight and length were, etc. You can add extraneous detail to anything. But it's still a simple question.

[decocker 7,198]

It's not difficult to determine what chromosomes a person has. Those with a Y chromosome are male. Those without one are female. That's fairly simple to me.

it's fairly simple to you, because you are not androgynous (i assume).

[JohnR! 5,495]

It's not difficult to determine what chromosomes a person has. Those with a Y chromosome are male. Those without one are female. That's fairly simple to me.

That is how it is currently done, except in the cases where the genetic markers are not clear.