Jump to content
maxxell

Is WIC welfare for I-864 purposes?

 Share

24 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Public charge and "means tested benefit" are 2 different things.

Medicaid IS means-tested, the USC can be sued by the government to pay it back.

As I stated, public charge and means tested benefit are 2 different things.

Just because someone CAN get them, doesn't mean the government won't pursue them to repay it.

But......it is the designation of the alien having become a public charge by use of a means tested benefit that triggers any repayment.

I think kptaylor is correct. Or at least as right as anyone can be with no knowledge of the OP's state of residence. Read within for info on "deeming":

http://www.nilc.org/sponsoredimms&bens-na-2009-08.html

Regarding Medicaid, if you carefully read the Medicaid services listed in kptaylor's link, these are very limited services or emergency Medicaid services. Every so often there's another thread here about a pregnant K1 newlywed accepting emergency Medicaid. And we then go through the exercise of re-educating everybody that it's perfectly OK for the alien spouse to deliver under this program.

The real trigger for any possible repayment under the I864 is accepting a cash benefit. There are many things in this world which appear to be means tested because the service is based upon income levels. I don't believe that a nutrition program which benefits a USC child is one of them.

I should also add that the State Department can't detemine what USCIS will do. Stick to links from the authority which would be making a decision.

Edited by Rebecca Jo

Our journey together on this earth has come to an end.

I will see you one day again, my love.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Australia
Timeline

But......it is the designation of the alien having become a public charge by use of a means tested benefit that triggers any repayment.

I think kptaylor is correct. Or at least as right as anyone can be with no knowledge of the OP's state of residence. Read within for info on "deeming":

http://www.nilc.org/sponsoredimms&bens-na-2009-08.html

Regarding Medicaid, if you carefully read the Medicaid services listed in kptaylor's link, these are very limited services or emergency Medicaid services. Every so often there's another thread here about a pregnant K1 newlywed accepting emergency Medicaid. And we then go through the exercise of re-educating everybody that it's perfectly OK for the alien spouse to deliver under this program.

The real trigger for any possible repayment under the I864 is accepting a cash benefit. There are many things in this world which appear to be means tested because the service is based upon income levels. I don't believe that a nutrition program which benefits a USC child is one of them.

No, not exactly. Certain benefits aren't public-charge issues but ARE means-tested benefits issues and the USC may be asked to repay them (per the link I provided earlier CHIP is not a public charge consideration but IS a means-tested benefit that may be asked to be repaid) but they won't have an effect on the immigrants status, hence my correction on the terms used.

Otherwise I agree. WIC is a benefit for the USC child, so using it should not be a means-tested issue.

Edited by Vanessa&Tony
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Australia
Timeline

Hi Guys well i just came here hoping someone would have gone through this well thing is my wife came with a K-1 Visa and we got married and now processing her adjustment of status. So anyways we got a baby girl last month we wanna apply for WIC program for those of you who havent heard about it its like a program providing nutrition which is done by the department of Agriculture , so question is since i signed affidavit of support if we get this program would that be considered as welfare or ? anybody who knows pleases help

WIC is a means-tested benefit in that your income is taken into consideration, but I believe that as it is a resource for the USC child, not necessarily for the immigrant, you most likely won't be asked to repay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, not exactly. Certain benefits aren't public-charge issues but ARE means-tested benefits issues and the USC may be asked to repay them (per the link I provided earlier CHIP is not a public charge consideration but IS a means-tested benefit that may be asked to be repaid) but they won't have an effect on the immigrants status, hence my correction on the terms used.

Otherwise I agree. WIC is a benefit for the USC child, so using it should not be a means-tested issue.

I disagree Vanessa. But, hey - whatever.

And I will once again add - your link is from State. Not a good source for a Service issue.

Edited by Rebecca Jo

Our journey together on this earth has come to an end.

I will see you one day again, my love.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

Basically, I think the story is this: before the immigrant gets a green card, it's okay for the immigrant to get WIC, Medicaid, Food stamps, etc. all they want if they qualify, because these things are not considered for public charge consideration when adjusting status. And I-864 obligations only kick in when the immigrant becomes a permanent resident.

However, after they get a green card with a sponsor who filled out an I-864, then the sponsor's income will be considered when they try to get these things, and thus they likely won't be able to get it; and even if they do get it, the government can sue the sponsor to pay it back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Morocco
Timeline

WIC would be for the USC baby, not the mother so it would not have negative effect on your wife.

Maybe if you write it in caps and swear people will see what you wrote lol, don't complicate what is uncomplicated by giving too many facts. WIC IS FOR THE BABYYYYYYYYY, which means its perfectly fine. The baby is a US CITIZEN receiving nutrition, and was not included in the initial sponsor contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

Maybe if you write it in caps and swear people will see what you wrote lol, don't complicate what is uncomplicated by giving too many facts. WIC IS FOR THE BABYYYYYYYYY, which means its perfectly fine. The baby is a US CITIZEN receiving nutrition, and was not included in the initial sponsor contract.

I believe that there is WIC separately for the baby and the mother (that's why it's called "Women, Infants, and Children"). When my girlfriend was pregnant, she got WIC for herself (baby was not born yet). After the baby was born, the baby couldn't get WIC because my income was too high. But they said the mother could still get WIC. But the mother couldn't get things like formula and breast pump because that's only for the baby's WIC. The mother could only get things like milk and bread.

Edited by newacct
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...