Jump to content

184 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

The issue here is not whether it is legal for the private segregated proms to occur, since they are most certainly legal. It is whether it is moral to support segregated proms. The legal and the moral do not always coincide.

However it is perfectly acceptable to have an organization which taxpayer funded workers assist limit it's membership to blacks only. Not an eyebrow raised about the Congressional Black caucus.

We all know if it was a white only club, and a black got turned down for skin color only, the justice department would be already involved, and the media would be non-stop.

Posted

As for Teens walking home doing nothing wrong--You seem to forget he attacked GZ from behind and tried to kill him.. Not saying GZ was without fault but Innocent TM hew was not

You say this like it's a known fact. That's the defense's argument, but let's not pretend this has been proven. All that's been proven is that there was an altercation, which would NOT have happened had GZ not followed him.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Thailand
Timeline
Posted

All that's been proven is that there was an altercation, which would NOT have happened had GZ not followed him.

Is that a known fact? Who decides what is fact or not?

You can click on the 'X' to the right to ignore this signature.

Posted

You say this like it's a known fact. That's the defense's argument, but let's not pretend this has been proven. All that's been proven is that there was an altercation, which would NOT have happened had GZ not followed him.

Let's see you open with "Nothing has been proven, nothing is a known fact."

You close with, this would not have happened if GZ had not been following TM.

Do I even have to point out the obvious to you ?

Liberal Logic... :bonk::bonk::bonk::bonk:

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Thailand
Timeline
Posted

The jury, unless the Defense, the Prosecution, and the Judge all stipulate to the facts, and present them to the jury as such.

As far as I know, there hasn't been a trial yet.

You can click on the 'X' to the right to ignore this signature.

Posted

Is that a known fact? Who decides what is fact or not?

I see you easily saw the blaring liberal logic in that also.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted (edited)

Brianna is an ethnic sounding name ??? really ?

As for Teens walking home doing nothing wrong--You seem to forget he attacked GZ from behind and tried to kill him.. Not saying GZ was without fault but Innocent TM hew was not

Who said Catholic priest are not judged. I sure do hold the catholic church accountable

Brianna is a Celtic name. It's the feminine version of Brian.

Edited by bsd058

 

IR-1 Visa Timeline (Service Center: Vermont)

image.png.806852c45242bc72b5f44a862566bdaf.png

 

N-400 Timeline (Field Office: Orlando, FL) & Voter Registration (Online)

image.png.c85e21010f669e0303f6fafb51f19f82.png

 

Passport Timeline (Submitted at USPS, Standard Processing, Standard Delivery, Locator number: 51) & SSA Update & Naturalization Certificate Receipt

 

03/23/2022: Application for passport submitted at USPS facility under standard processing.

04/04/2022: Status changed to “The U.S. Department of State has received your application for your passport book on 04/04/2022. We're now reviewing your application and supporting documents...Your application locator number is 51*******.

04/04/2022: Check for passport cashed.

05/03/2022: Status changed to "The U.S. Department of State approved your application for your passport book. We're now printing your passport book and preparing to give it to you. You should receive your passport book on or around 05/09/2022."

05/05/2022: Passport Received.

05/09/2022: SSA Citizenship Status Updated.

05/25/2022: Naturalization Certificate received in mail.

 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Thailand
Timeline
Posted

I personally wish they would make everyting equal across the board, but it's never going to happen. You know why?

Because people in general will always discriminate agaisnt someone who isn't like them. Now your personal preference is yours alone, but if you want to get rid of all the above mentioned programs, here's what needs to happen first:

People with ethnic names like Jamal or Brianna who have degrees and qualifications should get the same looks as Paul or Jane.

When teens commit murders, they're murderers, not thugs(black) and misguided teens(white)

When shootings happen in the urban areas, they make the news, not after someone shoots up a white neighborhood

When a teenager who smokes weed, walks home and gets killed because someone decided to follow him even though he was doing nothing wrong, get the same legal treatment if the races were reversed

I hate to break it to you, but the way to change peoples minds isn't by giving them special treatment because of their race. That just breeds more racism by people who probably weren't racist in the first place.

You can click on the 'X' to the right to ignore this signature.

Posted

I hate to break it to you, but the way to change peoples minds isn't by giving them special treatment because of their race. That just breeds more racism by people who probably weren't racist in the first place.

Then stop treating people like they are a lower class of citizen than you are. I'm not talking to you, I'm talking about the folks that swear it's all on black and brown people to succeed in life, but are the first ones to close the door in their faces when we start coming into their spaces. AA was created not to give anyone race an advantage, but to level the playing field. It also helped with women as well, but folks seem to only focus on blacks and hispanics. If you see a woman doctor, do you think she earned that job, or did she receive special treatment?

“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.” – Coretta Scott King

"Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge." -Toni Morrison

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

President-Obama-jpg.jpg

Posted

Is that a known fact? Who decides what is fact or not?

A known fact that an altercation happened? Well, one person is dead and the other got knocked around. So I'd say it's known that an altercation happened.

A known fact that it wouldn't have happened if GZ hadn't followed him? The 911 call indicates that to be true. He thought he was suspicious, so he followed him and eventually an altercation happened.

Posted (edited)

Let's see you open with "Nothing has been proven, nothing is a known fact."

You close with, this would not have happened if GZ had not been following TM.

Do I even have to point out the obvious to you ?

Liberal Logic... :bonk::bonk::bonk::bonk:

When you say things like "liberal logic" it automatically devalues your argument. FYI. If you want to generalize people into one group of thinking just because you disagree with them, feel free, but realize that it makes you look small minded. I do not believe all Republicans think the same. It's a shame you're under the impression that all liberals think alike AND you feel the need to mention it in nearly every post when you think you have a valid argument.

Your argument would hold much more weight if you could stop the judging and just get on to your point.

You stated that TM attacked GZ. That's pure speculation. I said an altercation happened. That's not speculation. I also said it wouldn't have happened had GZ not followed TM. GZ ADMITTED to following TM so I guess I'll take his word on the fact that he did. If you believe that TM would have attacked GZ if GZ hadn't followed him, then fine. Perhaps he would have. I've seen nothing to suggest that, though.

I see you easily saw the blaring liberal logic in that also.

There we go again. If you want to be taken seriously, stop typing like you're Danno and putting "lib logic" in all of your responses. You're smarter than that, you can articulate your argument without throwing a little snide comment at the end of it. I know you're capable, you should give it a try.

People might be more willing to actually discuss things with you.

Edited by Evylin
 
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...