And they are allowed to write gun control laws '!!!!!

[Karee 4,190]

now why in the world would you interrupt this gun nut circle jerk! they were all so close..

Exactly.

[Danno 1,228]

Women's rights (the rights I was referring to anyway) are generally reproductive.

If you'd like examples, I HIGHLY suggest Googling the horribly inaccurate/ignorant things Republican men seem to believe about pregnancy and rape. It's fun.

These are the men who want to write laws determining what women can or can't do with their own bodies. Good stuff.

So in other words, unless you can "personally relate" to the topic, you just have no right passing laws on it?

In some ways that would work out really, really, good.

PS: Where are those "mens rights" I inquired about?

[Penny Lane 8,159]

So in other words, unless you can "personally relate" to the topic, you just have no right passing laws on it?

In some ways that would work out really, really, good.

PS: Where are those "mens rights" I inquired about?

Are you really having difficulty seeing the similarities in the situations? You're posting about people uneducated about guns writing gun laws. I'm posting about people uneducated about pregnancy and rape trying to write laws relating to women's reproductive rights.

Which men's rights would you like to talk about, Danno? I'm here to listen!

[JohnR! 5,495]

So in other words, unless you can "personally relate" to the topic, you just have no right passing laws on it?

In some ways that would work out really, really, good.

PS: Where are those "mens rights" I inquired about?

Are you really having difficulty seeing the similarities in the situations? You're posting about people uneducated about guns writing gun laws. I'm posting about people uneducated about pregnancy and rape trying to write laws relating to women's reproductive rights.

Which men's rights would you like to talk about, Danno? I'm here to listen!

I love posts that begin with 'So...' Great fodder for agniologists.

Edited April 4, 2013 by Gegel

[Penny Lane 8,159]

I think you got those quotes mixed up.

EDIT: Nevermind, I just can't read.

EDIT: Or maybe you edited it.

I don't know what to believe anymore.

Edited April 4, 2013 by Evylin

[Karee 4,190]

I love posts that begin with 'So...' Great fodder for agniologists.

You playing with your English dictionary again?

[JohnR! 5,495]

I think you got those quotes mixed up.

Did I ever!

Fixed.

You playing with your English dictionary again?

Which one? :rofl: :rofl:

Edited April 4, 2013 by Gegel

[Danno 1,228]

Which men's rights would you like to talk about, Danno? I'm here to listen!

Name a few and we can discuss it.

[JohnR! 5,495]

I think you got those quotes mixed up.

EDIT: Nevermind, I just can't read.

EDIT: Or maybe you edited it.

I don't know what to believe anymore.

I edited it.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

Name a few and we can discuss it.

What? You're the one who brought them up, in response to my "women's rights" comment. Surely you brought it up for a reason? Don't back out on it now, let's hear it.

Are there men's reproductive rights that women are trying to write laws about?

Edited April 4, 2013 by Evylin

[Teddy B 17,252]

Have you got an example of men not understanding the facts of the legislation arounds "women's rights."

and for a bonus question, name for me a few "Mens rights".

Men's rights?? You mean every law and right on the books written by men, for mankind? Womens rights have to be separated from man's rights and laws because womens bodies weren't considered when MEN wrote the laws.

Geebus you is dumber dan dumb.

Edited April 4, 2013 by Teddy B

[Penny Lane 8,159]

Men's rights?? You mean every law and right on the books written by men, for mankind? Womens rights have to be separated from man's rights and laws because womens bodies weren't considered when MEN wrote the laws.

Geebus you is dumber dan dumb.

Pretty sure men's rights are just called RIGHTS.

[Teddy B 17,252]

Pretty sure men's rights are just called RIGHTS.

Exactly!!

[SMR 368]

Are you really having difficulty seeing the similarities in the situations? You're posting about people uneducated about guns writing gun laws. I'm posting about people uneducated about pregnancy and rape trying to write laws relating to women's reproductive rights.

Which men's rights would you like to talk about, Danno? I'm here to listen!

There isn't a difference. Todd Akin lost by a wide margin as he should of. We should get rid of the clowns trying to write ignorant laws about gun control in the same way.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

There isn't a difference. Todd Akin lost by a wide margin as he should of. We should get rid of the clowns trying to write ignorant laws about gun control in the same way.

If people are uneducated about something, they should absolutely have no right to write laws on that very thing. I absolutely agree.

It amuses me, though, that some people only care when that "something" is what they agree with.

Ignorant people writing laws about abortion? Sure, sign 'em up!

Ignorant people writing laws about gun control? OMG THESE PEOPLE ARE IDIOTS!!