Al Qaeda seeking nuclear kit for attacks-UK official

[Mags 112]

So, they are (potentially) getting nuclear weapons? Well, we can live our lives one of two ways.

1) Be terrified for the rest of it

Or

2) Get ON with your life, terrorist threat or not. WE can't stop a nuclear threat. So...why worry about something that may or may not happen.

We can be vigilant...but that doesn't mean acting like scared little cowering puppies.

I shall get on with my life and enjoy it. If they're going to bomb me then fair enough...I'm not going to let them spoil what is my life, or whatever is remaining of it.

Edited November 15, 2006 by mags

[Ban Hammer 13,346]

In 1942, it was the site of a highly successful biological warfare test by British military scientists from Porton Down

I didn't say the British military couldn't do it. I'm saying Mohammed al-Jihad cannot do it.

plagiarism that's how they'll do it.

[garya505 2]

Let's see how the neo-cons can somehow blame this on the "libruls" and "Dems".

If they gut the Patriot act and give our civil rights to the terrorists then it will be their fault.

Umm, we need to gut the "Pattiot" act to give our civil rights back to ourselves.

Your civil rights won't be worth sh!t if they manage to light off a sub-kiloton nuke or dirty bomb in NYC.

[I'm Gone 60]

Have they tried eBay? LOL

[mawilson 2,133]

plagiarism that's how they'll do it.

So you're telling me that a high-tech homidical cult flush with money and

obsessed with chemical and biological weapons who had their own factories

and the best scientists that money could buy couldn't create any viable

biological weapons, but a bunch of hare-brained Islamic jerks can? Bollocks.

Edited November 15, 2006 by mawilson

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Let's see how the neo-cons can somehow blame this on the "libruls" and "Dems".

If they gut the Patriot act and give our civil rights to the terrorists then it will be their fault.

Umm, we need to gut the "Pattiot" act to give our civil rights back to ourselves.

Your civil rights won't be worth sh!t if they manage to light off a sub-kiloton nuke or dirty bomb in NYC.

Not quite the point, I think. Leo Strauss would be proud.

[mawilson 2,133]

Your civil rights won't be worth sh!t if they manage to light off a sub-kiloton nuke or dirty bomb in NYC.

My civil rights are worth the same, bomb or no bomb.

[Ban Hammer 13,346]

plagiarism that's how they'll do it.

So you're telling me that a high-tech homidical cult flush with money and

obsessed with chemical and biological weapons who had their own factories

and the best scientists that money could buy couldn't create any viable

biological weapons, but a bunch of hare-brained Islamic jerks can? Bollocks.

so you wish to sell islam cheap then.

i'd not be surprised if they did come up with a fairly decent bioweapon in the near future.

Your civil rights won't be worth sh!t if they manage to light off a sub-kiloton nuke or dirty bomb in NYC.

My civil rights are worth the same, bomb or no bomb.

i believe what he's saying is civil rights don't mean anything to the dead........

[garya505 2]

plagiarism that's how they'll do it.

So you're telling me that a high-tech homidical cult flush with money and

obsessed with chemical and biological weapons who had their own factories

and the best scientists that money could buy couldn't create any viable

biological weapons, but a bunch of hare-brained Islamic jerks can? Bollocks.

so you wish to sell islam cheap then.

i'd not be surprised if they did come up with a fairly decent bioweapon in the near future.

Your civil rights won't be worth sh!t if they manage to light off a sub-kiloton nuke or dirty bomb in NYC.

My civil rights are worth the same, bomb or no bomb.

i believe what he's saying is civil rights don't mean anything to the dead........

correct

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

plagiarism that's how they'll do it.

So you're telling me that a high-tech homidical cult flush with money and

obsessed with chemical and biological weapons who had their own factories

and the best scientists that money could buy couldn't create any viable

biological weapons, but a bunch of hare-brained Islamic jerks can? Bollocks.

so you wish to sell islam cheap then.

i'd not be surprised if they did come up with a fairly decent bioweapon in the near future.

Your civil rights won't be worth sh!t if they manage to light off a sub-kiloton nuke or dirty bomb in NYC.

My civil rights are worth the same, bomb or no bomb.

i believe what he's saying is civil rights don't mean anything to the dead........

I guess then they don’t mean anything to the people who die to protect them

[mawilson 2,133]

so you wish to sell islam cheap then.

i'd not be surprised if they did come up with a fairly decent bioweapon in the near future.

I'm not selling them cheap, but it's not like your average Jihadist has smarter

scientists or better resources than the Japs.

Yes, it's possible to create biological weapons.

Can you create one in your kitchen? NO.

Can Mohammed Jihad create it with his buddies in a bio weapons lab in Al Hufuf

with a million dollars from Al Qaeda? NO.

Can the government of Iran create a bio weapon with the help of their best scientists?

Of course they can, but they sure as hell are not going to hand it over to some

flaky terrorist hell bent on wreaking havoc.

[Ban Hammer 13,346]

so you wish to sell islam cheap then.

i'd not be surprised if they did come up with a fairly decent bioweapon in the near future.

I'm not selling them cheap, but it's not like your average Jihadist has smarter

scientists or better resources than the Japs.

Yes, it's possible to create biological weapons.

Can you create one in your kitchen? NO.

Can Mohammed Jihad create it with his buddies in a bio weapons lab in Al Hufuf NO.

Can the government of Iran create a bio weapon with the help of their best scientists?

Of course they can, but they sure as hell are not going to hand it over to some

flaky terrorist hell bent on wreaking havoc.

with the right people, this one is a strong possibility too

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

And some of you still scoff that there really is a "war on terror"

Lets clarify here. I scoff at what Bush calls the "war on terror". In other words there's a difference between the rhetoric and actually taking steps to prevent terrorism, and what Bush has done over the past 3-4 years (plunge us into an arguably illegal war in Iraq, which has now become a breeding ground for the exact sort of people that we are supposedly trying to stop.

The "War on terror" is a slogan. It has about as much to do with stopping terrorism as suggesting that the Democratic Party represents pure Democracy.

[Heracles 417]

Let's see how the neo-cons can somehow blame this on the "libruls" and "Dems".

Your right. It's just war mongering or is it fear mongering. That is, from a group who has already proven their threats are not to be taken lightly ie eg Sept 11, Spain train bombings, London Bombings, terror in Iraq, earlier attempted WTC bombings, Bali bombings..

I wonder which cities will be next. LA, Chicago, DC. They are definitely planning something big and may have already carried stuff over the border from Mexico to carry it out.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Let's see how the neo-cons can somehow blame this on the "libruls" and "Dems".

Your right. It's just war mongering or is it fear mongering. That is, from a group who has already proven their threats are not to be taken lightly ie eg Sept 11, Spain train bombings, London Bombings, terror in Iraq, earlier attempted WTC bombings, Bali bombings..

I wonder which cities will be next. LA, Chicago, DC. They are definitely planning something big and may have already carried stuff over the border from Mexico to carry it out.

Which justifies what exactly? Turning your country into a police state?