Jump to content

10 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

It's very frustrating the USCIS national average was 7.9 months yesterday. Today it is 10.2 months. USCIS won't allow inquiries under "normal processing times." but the "normal" time keeps changing. I could have made inquiries in April. Now it looks like I can't until mid June! Even my congressman can't get anything more than "it's within NORMAL processing times." if he inquires for me.

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Netherlands
Timeline
Posted

I got 10.2 months, but it says that data is as of Dec 31, 2012, but if you click on that link at the bottom that says "View national volumes and trends for all applications" the data is through January….

uscis screenshot.tiff

K1 Timeline:


01/24/2013 - Sent I129F overnight to TX lockbox

01/28/2013 - NOA1

05/15/2013 - NOA2

05/28/2013 - Received at NVC

05/29/2013 - Sent to Consulate

05/31/2013 - Received at Consulate

06/01/2013 - Packet 3 Received

06/05/2013 - Packet 3 Sent

06/08/2013 - Packet 4 Received

06/18/2013 - Medical

07/16/2013 - Interview Date

07/20/2013 - Visa Received

07/25/2013 - POE


AOS Timeline:


03/16/2014 - Package sent

03/21/2014 - NOA1 for AP & EAD

03/25/2014 - NOA1 for AOS

04/15/2014 - Biometrics appointment

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

I think I was mistaken. I now see 7.9 again.

No you weren't mistaken...their website is apparently FUBAR, just like their I-129F processing.

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/420931-differing-processing-times-for-csc-from-my-case-status-page/page__view__findpost__p__6068171

How can we expect them to do anything right, if something like a website display is so messed up.

Does not instill confidence, that is for sure.

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Australia
Timeline
Posted

If K-1 processing was at 10.2 months as of December wouldn't that mean most people from February 2012 onwards wouldn't be approved? That can't be right...

AOS+EAD Sent 8-9-13

AOS+EAD Received 8-13-13

EAD NOA1 8-13-13

AOS NOA1 8-15-13

AOS+EAD Biometrics 9-17-2013, Walk-In 8-29-2013

EAD Approved 10-15-13

AOS Interview 12-18-13

E-REQUEST 2-3-14

INFOPASS Appointment 2-12-14

AOS Approved 2-24-2014

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

*** Thread moved from K-1 Process forum to USCIS Service Centers forum -- topic involves processing-times. ***

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

That average also includes TSC and NBC.

Which means it is a meaningless statistic.

Which means Mark Schwartz, USCIS Chief Information Officer, is a #### #### idiot.

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...