Jump to content
Ban Hammer

Judge throws out soda ban ruling

 Share

43 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline

On March 11, a judge from the New York Supreme Court ruled in favor of several beverage companies, and threw out Mayor Bloomberg's ban on soda's sold in quantities of more than 16 ounces.

In a decision that took place just one day before the ban was to go into effect, Justice Milton Tingling agreed with the plaintiff's arguments that controlling soda content created a conflict between the power of the state, and a consumer's right to personal liberty.

A judge has invalidated Mayor Bloomberg's controversial plan to ban large sugary drinks from restaurants and other eateries, one day before the new law was to take effect.

State Supreme Court Justice Milton Tingling in Manhattan ruled the new regulation was “arbitrary and capricious” and declared it invalid, after several soda and business groups had sued the city challenging the ban.

Beverage manufacturers and business groups had called the law an illegal overreach that would infringe upon consumers' personal liberty. - NY Daily News

The ban on soda's sold in quantities over 16 ounces is but one of several initiatives and regulations being pushed by Mayor Bloomberg during his third term in office. Besides limiting the size of soft drinks that can be sold in retail establishments or restaurants, the New York City Mayor is also promoting a ban on styrofoam and even the right for citizens to smoke in their own residences.

Today's ruling by Justice Tingling may have a greater effect on the Mayor's ability to legislate through regulation than simply overturning a ban on soda sizes. With the focus of the judge's ruling being on protecting consumer rights, and the liberty for each person to determine their own choices in what they purchase and consumer, the end result may be a serious curtailing of several activist causes Mayor Bloomberg has scheduled, which could effect the rights of New York City citizens.

link

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline

Finally some common sense

Sent I-129 Application to VSC 2/1/12
NOA1 2/8/12
RFE 8/2/12
RFE reply 8/3/12
NOA2 8/16/12
NVC received 8/27/12
NVC left 8/29/12
Manila Embassy received 9/5/12
Visa appointment & approval 9/7/12
Arrived in US 10/5/2012
Married 11/24/2012
AOS application sent 12/19/12

AOS approved 8/24/13

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline

drats. i was looking forward to the real-estate buyers market, with all of the fatties moving cross the river to Jersey.

Darn.

Damnation, even.

Sometimes my language usage seems confusing - please feel free to 'read it twice', just in case !
Ya know, you can find the answer to your question with the advanced search tool, when using a PC? Ditch the handphone, come back later on a PC, and try again.

-=-=-=-=-=R E A D ! ! !=-=-=-=-=-

Whoa Nelly ! Want NVC Info? see http://www.visajourney.com/wiki/index.php/NVC_Process

Congratulations on your approval ! We All Applaud your accomplishment with Most Wonderful Kissies !

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline

The moronic gun laws can go next. It is not like the constitution specifically protects an individual right to have a Big Gulp...but there it is!

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline

He is heavy handed and had to be stopped. Discrimination against laterally challenged people

Sent I-129 Application to VSC 2/1/12
NOA1 2/8/12
RFE 8/2/12
RFE reply 8/3/12
NOA2 8/16/12
NVC received 8/27/12
NVC left 8/29/12
Manila Embassy received 9/5/12
Visa appointment & approval 9/7/12
Arrived in US 10/5/2012
Married 11/24/2012
AOS application sent 12/19/12

AOS approved 8/24/13

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline

The moronic gun laws can go next. It is not like the constitution specifically protects an individual right to have a Big Gulp...but there it is!

Twinkies and Oreos would have been next

Sent I-129 Application to VSC 2/1/12
NOA1 2/8/12
RFE 8/2/12
RFE reply 8/3/12
NOA2 8/16/12
NVC received 8/27/12
NVC left 8/29/12
Manila Embassy received 9/5/12
Visa appointment & approval 9/7/12
Arrived in US 10/5/2012
Married 11/24/2012
AOS application sent 12/19/12

AOS approved 8/24/13

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline

I thought Twinkies went already, thanks to the Union Problems at the Hostess Plants in Irving TX ?

http://www.dallasnews.com/business/headlines/20121116-twinkie-maker-irving-based-hostess-to-go-out-of-business.ece

I do hope they come back - see http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/2013/01/29/pabst-owner-nears-deal-for-irving-based-twinkies/

But I doubt it... http://hostessbrands.com/Closed.aspx

I miss Twinkies and Ding Dongs - Ho Hos, also can.

Edited by Darnell

Sometimes my language usage seems confusing - please feel free to 'read it twice', just in case !
Ya know, you can find the answer to your question with the advanced search tool, when using a PC? Ditch the handphone, come back later on a PC, and try again.

-=-=-=-=-=R E A D ! ! !=-=-=-=-=-

Whoa Nelly ! Want NVC Info? see http://www.visajourney.com/wiki/index.php/NVC_Process

Congratulations on your approval ! We All Applaud your accomplishment with Most Wonderful Kissies !

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline

I thought Twinkies went already, thanks to the Union Problems at the Hostess Plants in Irving TX ?

http://www.dallasnews.com/business/headlines/20121116-twinkie-maker-irving-based-hostess-to-go-out-of-business.ece

I do hope they come back - see http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/2013/01/29/pabst-owner-nears-deal-for-irving-based-twinkies/

But I doubt it... http://hostessbrands.com/Closed.aspx

I miss Twinkies and Ding Dongs - Ho Hos, also can.

Twinkies will never really be gone. They have a "half life" of 3,000,000 years. The earth will eventually shrivel and hurtle toward the sun and the only thing left will be Twinkies and cockroaches.

The cockroaches in the middle east will be killing each other

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline

Bloomberg is going for an appeal on the decision

Sent I-129 Application to VSC 2/1/12
NOA1 2/8/12
RFE 8/2/12
RFE reply 8/3/12
NOA2 8/16/12
NVC received 8/27/12
NVC left 8/29/12
Manila Embassy received 9/5/12
Visa appointment & approval 9/7/12
Arrived in US 10/5/2012
Married 11/24/2012
AOS application sent 12/19/12

AOS approved 8/24/13

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On March 11, a judge from the New York Supreme Court ruled in favor of several beverage companies, and threw out Mayor Bloomberg's ban on soda's sold in quantities of more than 16 ounces.

In a decision that took place just one day before the ban was to go into effect, Justice Milton Tingling agreed with the plaintiff's arguments that controlling soda content created a conflict between the power of the state, and a consumer's right to personal liberty.

A judge has invalidated Mayor Bloomberg's controversial plan to ban large sugary drinks from restaurants and other eateries, one day before the new law was to take effect.

State Supreme Court Justice Milton Tingling in Manhattan ruled the new regulation was "arbitrary and capricious" and declared it invalid, after several soda and business groups had sued the city challenging the ban.

Beverage manufacturers and business groups had called the law an illegal overreach that would infringe upon consumers' personal liberty. - NY Daily News

The ban on soda's sold in quantities over 16 ounces is but one of several initiatives and regulations being pushed by Mayor Bloomberg during his third term in office. Besides limiting the size of soft drinks that can be sold in retail establishments or restaurants, the New York City Mayor is also promoting a ban on styrofoam and even the right for citizens to smoke in their own residences.

Today's ruling by Justice Tingling may have a greater effect on the Mayor's ability to legislate through regulation than simply overturning a ban on soda sizes. With the focus of the judge's ruling being on protecting consumer rights, and the liberty for each person to determine their own choices in what they purchase and consumer, the end result may be a serious curtailing of several activist causes Mayor Bloomberg has scheduled, which could effect the rights of New York City citizens.

link

Maybe there are some sane people left in America

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline

Bloomberg is going for an appeal on the decision

Bet he doesn't use his own money to do it. He will use NY taxpayer money to attempt to strip them of their rights. Nice guy.

Something you NEVER hear in Vermont..."I could be in New York in 20 minutes if it were not for that damn lake!"

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline

On March 11, a judge from the New York Supreme Court ruled in favor of several beverage companies, and threw out Mayor Bloomberg's ban on soda's sold in quantities of more than 16 ounces.

In a decision that took place just one day before the ban was to go into effect, Justice Milton Tingling agreed with the plaintiff's arguments that controlling soda content created a conflict between the power of the state, and a consumer's right to personal liberty.

A judge has invalidated Mayor Bloomberg's controversial plan to ban large sugary drinks from restaurants and other eateries, one day before the new law was to take effect.

State Supreme Court Justice Milton Tingling in Manhattan ruled the new regulation was “arbitrary and capricious” and declared it invalid, after several soda and business groups had sued the city challenging the ban.

Beverage manufacturers and business groups had called the law an illegal overreach that would infringe upon consumers' personal liberty. - NY Daily News

The ban on soda's sold in quantities over 16 ounces is but one of several initiatives and regulations being pushed by Mayor Bloomberg during his third term in office. Besides limiting the size of soft drinks that can be sold in retail establishments or restaurants, the New York City Mayor is also promoting a ban on styrofoam and even the right for citizens to smoke in their own residences.

Today's ruling by Justice Tingling may have a greater effect on the Mayor's ability to legislate through regulation than simply overturning a ban on soda sizes. With the focus of the judge's ruling being on protecting consumer rights, and the liberty for each person to determine their own choices in what they purchase and consumer, the end result may be a serious curtailing of several activist causes Mayor Bloomberg has scheduled, which could effect the rights of New York City citizens.

link

The NRA needs to replace the word "soda" with "7 round magazines" and apply the ruling to their challenge of the ridiculous new gun law.

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Israel
Timeline

One of the most retarded things a mayor has ever tried to do. I don't necessarily think much of the fast food culture is a good thing, however, it is not up to any mayor or politician to be your nanny and determine you can't drink as much as you want or as much as the restaurant is willing to give you. Then again, I also don't think it's up to any politician to tell you you can't smoke a friggin plant. Guess it's just the libertarian in me.

09/14/2012: Sent I-130
10/04/2012: NOA1 Received
12/11/2012: NOA2 Received
12/18/2012: NVC Received Case
01/08/2013: Received Case Number/IIN; DS-3032/I-864 Bill
01/08/2013: DS-3032 Sent
01/18/2013: DS-3032 Accepted; Received IV Bill
01/23/2013: Paid I-864 Bill; Paid IV Bill
02/05/2013: IV Package Sent
02/18/2013: AOS Package Sent
03/22/2013: Case complete
05/06/2013: Interview Scheduled

06/05/2013: Visa issued!

06/28/2013: VISA RECEIVED

07/09/2013: POE - EWR. Went super fast and easy. 5 minutes of waiting and then just a signature and finger print.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

05/06/2016: One month late - overnighted form N-400.

06/01/2016: Original Biometrics appointment, had to reschedule due to being away.

07/01/2016: Biometrics Completed.

08/17/2016: Interview scheduled & approved.

09/16/2016: Scheduled oath ceremony.

09/16/2016: THE END - 4 year long process all done!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...