Jump to content
Charro

Tax filing status and n400 application

 Share

11 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

I have posted this on two other boards but I am curious to hear the feedback from this group.

I am filing the n400 application. I am married and I have had my green card for more than five years. I have paid my taxes all the past years. However our tax preparer has used " head of household " and not married filing jointly . I did apply last year under the married to a us citizen category and it was denied due to the tax filing status. I understand why it was denied based on that category but will it be denied again under the 5 year category ? The interviewing officer recommended amending the taxes. We did not. Very exoensive. We will be filing under the correct status from now on. The officer also suggested waiting and filing under the 5 year category, as there is less paperwork etc . i have asked two other lawyers their opinions on this. One said to just reapply under the 5 year rule and the other said to do the same but maybe amend a few years back just to be on the safe side. Has anyone encountered such am issue? Thanks .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Mexico
Timeline

Did you qualify as head of household, or was your accountant being too aggressive. If you did not qualify, you can amend and refile up to trhee years after the fact--no harm, no foul. That will get you square with the IRS, and presumably USCIS as well.

As to cost to amend, it should be quite small unless you have a really complex tax situation.

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1040x.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Monaco
Timeline

I understand why it was denied based on that category but will it be denied again under the 5 year category ?

You should not be denied if you file under the 5-year residence category. Good luck!

200px-FSM_Logo.svg.png


www.ffrf.org




Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you both ! @ Magical , our tax situation isn't complex so we should just amend and get that done with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Australia
Timeline

I have posted this on two other boards but I am curious to hear the feedback from this group.

I am filing the n400 application. I am married and I have had my green card for more than five years. I have paid my taxes all the past years. However our tax preparer has used " head of household " and not married filing jointly . I did apply last year under the married to a us citizen category and it was denied due to the tax filing status. I understand why it was denied based on that category but will it be denied again under the 5 year category ? The interviewing officer recommended amending the taxes. We did not. Very exoensive. We will be filing under the correct status from now on. The officer also suggested waiting and filing under the 5 year category, as there is less paperwork etc . i have asked two other lawyers their opinions on this. One said to just reapply under the 5 year rule and the other said to do the same but maybe amend a few years back just to be on the safe side. Has anyone encountered such am issue? Thanks .

They flat out told you that you were denied because of tax filing status?? I doubt it. It had to have been for other reasons as well because you don't need to file as married joint to be approved. I would be willing to bet you lacked other proof of relationship.

Either way, your marriage isn't relevant to file based on 5 years.

Edited by Vanessa&Tony
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes he " flat out told me I was denied because of filing status ".. He was very nice about it though. He explained that filing based on the three year rule i.e bring married to a USC for three years one must prove you are living in a marital union. The filing status our tax preparer used was HOH ( head of household ) instead of MFJ( married filing jointly ). HOH status is to be used for single persons with a qualifying dependent and married person wirh dependent and spouse not living with them for the past 6 months. So of course we should not have used the HOH status . The interviewing officer even stated that once that is seen on the return it is always denied. Again this is only for the 3 year rule being married to a USC. The denial letter they sent also stated that that was the reason for the denial. Every other piece of documentation I sent in showed we were obviously married in good faith and living together. The one piece that created the issue was the tax return's filing status. Remember he did give me the opportunity to amend the taxes. I just chose not to as it seemed too expensive to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Australia
Timeline

Yes he " flat out told me I was denied because of filing status ".. He was very nice about it though. He explained that filing based on the three year rule i.e bring married to a USC for three years one must prove you are living in a marital union. The filing status our tax preparer used was HOH ( head of household ) instead of MFJ( married filing jointly ). HOH status is to be used for single persons with a qualifying dependent and married person wirh dependent and spouse not living with them for the past 6 months. So of course we should not have used the HOH status . The interviewing officer even stated that once that is seen on the return it is always denied. Again this is only for the 3 year rule being married to a USC. The denial letter they sent also stated that that was the reason for the denial. Every other piece of documentation I sent in showed we were obviously married in good faith and living together. The one piece that created the issue was the tax return's filing status. Remember he did give me the opportunity to amend the taxes. I just chose not to as it seemed too expensive to do.

Ooohhhh okay no. You weren't denied for not filing "married joint", you were denied for filing as a "single persons with a qualifying dependent and married person wirh dependent and spouse not living with them for the past 6 months" which is basically you saying either you're single or you're not actually living together... which for filing based on 3 years marriage to a USC is important.

The reason I'm making this distinction is, my husband and I had to file married separate this year for financial reasons. The fact that we filed "married separate" will not (should not) affect my N-400 application because 1. We ticked the box saying we are married and living together for last year and 2. Our address is the same. We are not anticipating a problem with this, there are other members who file married-separate as well...So basically you only need to file "married" something... doesn't matter if joint or separate.

Anyway it's moot now but you should be fine now. Good luck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@ Vanessa &tony , I saw this on AVVO ( attorneys answer your legal questions online) . Person was asking about married filing separately and applying for natrualization . Just sharing so you are prepared.

"Answered about 4 years ago. No it shouldn't affect anything. As long as you are reporting income and paying taxes the immigration service should be content. At your interview they may ask you why, because it suggests you're not living together, but there are many valid reasons why married people file separately and you should simply point out it was an economic choice." Again good luck !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Australia
Timeline

@ Vanessa &tony , I saw this on AVVO ( attorneys answer your legal questions online) . Person was asking about married filing separately and applying for natrualization . Just sharing so you are prepared.

"Answered about 4 years ago. No it shouldn't affect anything. As long as you are reporting income and paying taxes the immigration service should be content. At your interview they may ask you why, because it suggests you're not living together, but there are many valid reasons why married people file separately and you should simply point out it was an economic choice." Again good luck !

Thanks :) I admit I was terrified when I first realised this was our best recourse but thankfully I'm a member of this forum with such lovely helpful people :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...