Gay marriage

[Cristy 4]

Just go go along with the thread

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I vote 'no' because I think it will corrupt our youth and turn them into rapists, child molesters or (gasp!) other gay people!

Not only that but men might spurn their wives in favour of "attractive livestock", and our cities will turn into Soddom and Gomorrah - which God will wrinkle his nose at, and promptly turn to dust.

[lucyrich 20]

Defense of marriage? From whom? I think it's the heterosexuals who have debased marriage. If gays want to make a lifelong monogamous commitment, I don't see how they can harm the institution of marriage any worse than it's already been harmed by those who don't take it seriously. Who are we to tell them they need to be promiscuous instead of settling down?

[Karen_L 1]

I vote 'no' because I think it will corrupt our youth and turn them into rapists, child molesters or (gasp!) other gay people!

Not only that but men might spurn their wives in favour of "attractive livestock", and our cities will turn into Soddom and Gomorrah - which God will wrinkle his nose at, and promptly turn to dust.

EXACTLY what I was thinking!

[mybackpages 0]

arrrghhhh I do not think i have te strength

[ceriserose 1]

arrrghhhh I do not think i have te strength

Don't you post in the ME/NA forum? This should be a breeze!

(Just kidding with you...your post here made me giggle!)

Defense of marriage? From whom? I think it's the heterosexuals who have debased marriage. If gays want to make a lifelong monogamous commitment, I don't see how they can harm the institution of marriage any worse than it's already been harmed by those who don't take it seriously. Who are we to tell them they need to be promiscuous instead of settling down?

:applause:

[mybackpages 0]

Don't you post in the ME/NA forum? This should be a breeze!

(Just kidding with you...your post here made me giggle!)

You'd think! right?

Thanks for making me laugh this morning!

[BJZags 17]

I vote 'no' because I think it will corrupt our youth and turn them into rapists, child molesters or (gasp!) other gay people!

Not only that but men might spurn their wives in favour of "attractive livestock", and our cities will turn into Soddom and Gomorrah - which God will wrinkle his nose at, and promptly turn to dust.

Are you serious with this comment? I'm giving you the benefit of doubt and hoping you are joking.

[ceriserose 1]

I vote 'no' because I think it will corrupt our youth and turn them into rapists, child molesters or (gasp!) other gay people!

Not only that but men might spurn their wives in favour of "attractive livestock", and our cities will turn into Soddom and Gomorrah - which God will wrinkle his nose at, and promptly turn to dust.

Are you serious with this comment? I'm giving you the benefit of doubt and hoping you are joking.

Satire.

[mybackpages 0]

I vote 'no' because I think it will corrupt our youth and turn them into rapists, child molesters or (gasp!) other gay people!

Not only that but men might spurn their wives in favour of "attractive livestock", and our cities will turn into Soddom and Gomorrah - which God will wrinkle his nose at, and promptly turn to dust.

Are you serious with this comment? I'm giving you the benefit of doubt and hoping you are joking.

Satire.

in the great tradition of Jonathan Swift. Hungry? eat a child. Forget fiber, we all need a little for satire in our diet.

[ceriserose 1]

I vote 'no' because I think it will corrupt our youth and turn them into rapists, child molesters or (gasp!) other gay people!

Not only that but men might spurn their wives in favour of "attractive livestock", and our cities will turn into Soddom and Gomorrah - which God will wrinkle his nose at, and promptly turn to dust.

Are you serious with this comment? I'm giving you the benefit of doubt and hoping you are joking.

Satire.

in the great tradition of Jonathan Swift. Hungry? eat a child. Forget fiber, we all need a little for satire in our diet.

I wrote a great piece of satire on apartheid back in the 80's (if I may blow my own horn). It was my first attempt and it earned me an A and a love of the genre.

[Mags 112]

Marry the same sex, marry a horse, marry a giraffe...hell I don't care!

[KarenCee 3]

Who's place is it to tell anyone who they can or cannot marry? Certainly not mine.

[Asha+Joy=Love 0]

Hum… this is a fairly non-representational group you are polling with this question.

Everyone in this forum has an intended spouse or spouse with *United States Government Approved* genitalia. Otherwise we would have been refused even the chance to apply.

Perhaps we could hear from the millions of Americans who are deprived of their basic human right to marry by runing a concurrent poll on a forum called say… "VisaNot4u.com, our dream of family immigration denied by bigotry community"?

[ceriserose 1]

Hum… this is a fairly non-representational group you are polling with this question.

Everyone in this forum has an intended spouse or spouse with *United States Government Approved* genitalia. Otherwise we would have been refused even the chance to apply.

Perhaps we could hear from the millions of Americans who are deprived of their basic human right to marry by runing a concurrent poll on a forum called say… "VisaNot4u.com, our dream of family immigration denied by bigotry community"?

I think it would be interesting to hear from a greater number myself.

However, can we call the site "NoVisaJourneyforyou,don'tcomebackoneyear.com"?