Just Happy News

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

There will be no new federal gun laws.

http://news.yahoo.com/background-checks-could-gun-control-deal-breaker-111608280.html

Carry on with the gun-control-bukkake

[ready4ONE 5,400]

No. Everybody knows Obama will take your guns and place you in a re-education camp. Four plus years of stock up on guns and ammo now can't be wrong!

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

No. Everybody knows Obama will take your guns and place you in a re-education camp. Four plus years of stock up on guns and ammo now can't be wrong!

There were black helicopters circling over the neighborhood last weekend. No kidding. But they didn't land. Must be no guns around here.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

There will be no new federal gun laws.

http://news.yahoo.com/background-checks-could-gun-control-deal-breaker-111608280.html

Carry on with the gun-control-bukkake

I guess that would be good news for you, means people who shouldn't have guns will continue to acuire them, and we will have more bloodshed. Like the 5 year kid who was kidnapped and being held in a bunker underground. The bus driver dies trying to protect the kid.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

I guess that would be good news for you, means people who shouldn't have guns will continue to acuire them, and we will have more bloodshed. Like the 5 year kid who was kidnapped and being held in a bunker underground. The bus driver dies trying to protect the kid.

The tree of liberty is thirsty.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

I guess that would be good news for you, means people who shouldn't have guns will continue to acuire them, and we will have more bloodshed. Like the 5 year kid who was kidnapped and being held in a bunker underground. The bus driver dies trying to protect the kid.

If I thought for one second we could banning most guns would work and all the violance in this country would stop, I would be ok with that. However you and I and anybody with an IQ over 50 knows it would not and that guns are not the root of the problem and it would have very little effect on the problem.

I fully support universal background checks and stiff penalties for straw buyers. Also very strict penalties for people that use gunns in a crime.

Use a gun in a crime in New York you are going to get some serious time. Chicago not so much. Liberal judges in the most corrupt liberal city in the world slapping felons on the hand. Look at the difference in the crime rates.

However somehow guns are the problem ??

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

If I thought for one second we could banning most guns would work and all the violance in this country would stop, I would be ok with that. However you and I and anybody with an IQ over 50 knows it would not and that guns are not the root of the problem and it would have very little effect on the problem.

I fully support universal background checks and stiff penalties for straw buyers. Also very strict penalties for people that use gunns in a crime.

Use a gun in a crime in New York you are going to get some serious time. Chicago not so much. Liberal judges in the most corrupt liberal city in the world slapping felons on the hand. Look at the difference in the crime rates.

However somehow guns are the problem ??

And I agree, I think there should be a background check that no one could slide through, makes it harder for criminals to get guns. But I am upset with people whose answer is to give everyone a gun, kids can't carry a gun. And when in Chicago most of the people dying are children, then arming everyone isn't the answer.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

1359812290[/url]' post='5955742']

And I agree, I think there should be a background check that no one could slide through, makes it harder for criminals to get guns. But I am upset with people whose answer is to give everyone a gun, kids can't carry a gun. And when in Chicago most of the people dying are children, then arming everyone isn't the answer.

Arming everyone is not the answer, but neither is taking guns from those that have a right to have them. The guy that shot that poor sweet child. How many gun laws was he already in violation of ?

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

Arming everyone is not the answer, but neither is taking guns from those that have a right to have them. The guy that shot that poor sweet child. How many gun laws was he already in violation of ?

No one is talking about taking away the guns. I think everyone should have a right to protect themselves. I don't think you need an AR-15 to accomplish that goal unless you live in Pakistan. I just wrote my paper on the Witness compact and full version weapon, the compact can hold 15 bullets, if you need more than that, maybe you should move, or get more training. I support gun registration across the board, that way some of these folks that shouldn't have guns can have their guns taken away.

[james&olya 1,121]

There will be no new federal gun laws.

http://news.yahoo.com/background-checks-could-gun-control-deal-breaker-111608280.html

Carry on with the gun-control-bukkake

Happiness is a warm gun?

[Dakine10 5,452]

“My problem with background checks is you’re never going to get criminals to go through universal background checks,” said Wayne LaPierre, CEO for the NRA, told a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. “None of it makes any sense in the real world.”

Makes perfect sense in the real world if you're not a complete jackass. You make it harder for criminals to get guns, and then you get tougher on illegal gun purchases and possession.

Wayne LaPierre is at the top of a very profitable organization and he doesn't want anything in place that might make it a little harder to get one more legal gun owner on the books. It's a sad day if they are falling for this mumbo jumbo.

Edited February 2, 2013 by Dakine10