Gun buy back turns into gun show

[Darnell 8,478]

Never mind the guns. We have to get rid of this amnesty for illegals bullshit.

Hi Spooky ! I had faith in you - nice to see yer paying attention

[himher 634]

Yeah. We all want to be like California. The big artificially created welfare experiment built on a false economy at a fraction of the return on cost.

The BEST thing that could happen for the rest of us is to simply turn off the California faucets. Or better yet charge you market price / cost of investment for the use of them.

http://www.amazon.com/Cadillac-Desert-American-Disappearing-Revised/dp/0140178244

Speaking for Texas it would be great to cut off your gas lines as well. Let you try self-sufficiency for a much needed and refreshing change.

AS to the buyback we do not really want an America where you buy something then run the risk, after breaking no law, of being arrested for it.

They should be more like California. If you show up at a buy back here, and try to buy guns, the police will still check all the serial numbers, and you run the risk that one of the weapons you just bought, will end up putting you in jail, for a variety of reasons. Good example right there why all transfers of firearms should be recorded and background checked, for both the buyer, and the seller.

Edited February 1, 2013 by himher

[natty bumppo 297]

Missile launchers without missiles are non-functional. I didn't inspect this missile launcher but since it didn't come with a missile it was clearly non-functional. Pretty obvious really except for my poorly worded description.

wrong yet again.

the assembly to launch the missile is different than the missile. if the assembly (tube) is nonfunctional (per definition of nonfunctional), then the act of loading a live missile into the tube will result in the tube getting heavier. the tube will not launch the missile.

the act of launching a live missile from a nonfunctional tube will be simple ... how far can you throw it.

Edited February 1, 2013 by natty bumppo

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Speaking for Texas it would be great to cut off your gas lines as well. Let you try self-sufficiency for a much needed and refreshing change.

California doesn't need the crappy gas coming from Texas. I believe only PG&E buys it, because it is cheaper, and burns with lower BTU's per c.f., so it is a way for them to maximize their profits. Meanwhile, SoCal Gas Co is finding plenty of reserves in the more populous southern part of the state, not to mention how much gas is being brought down from Canada and Alaska.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

The BEST thing that could happen for the rest of us is to simply turn off the California faucets. Or better yet charge you market price / cost of investment for the use of them.

You need a geography lesson. California's water almost exclusively comes from within the state.

[Usui Takumi 1,562]

You need a geography lesson. California's water almost exclusively comes from within the state.

I thought So Cal imports a percentage of its water?

[himher 634]

(laughing)

Geography 101: The Colorado River Aqueduct carries water from the Colorado River to many parts of Southern California and supplies 37 to 46 percent of the water used in this region. It is controlled by the Metropolitan Water District (MWD), a public water wholesaler made up of 26 member agencies that together provide drinking water to some 19 million people in parts of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, and Ventura counties, a combined area of over 5,000 square miles.

As long as you acknowledge it comes from somewhere else its all good sport.

"Plenty of reserves" (N) def. Enough to make you self-sufficient.

Noticed the pump price this morning. $3.15. What are you guys paying over there - 4 bucks or so? Keep funding our nice homes and great lifestyles!!!! LOL

It keeps us from having to pay any income tax

California doesn't need the crappy gas coming from Texas. I believe only PG&E buys it, because it is cheaper, and burns with lower BTU's per c.f., so it is a way for them to maximize their profits. Meanwhile, SoCal Gas Co is finding plenty of reserves in the more populous southern part of the state, not to mention how much gas is being brought down from Canada and Alaska.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

I thought So Cal imports a percentage of its water?

Yep - From the rest of the state, and from its share of the water from the Colorado river.

[ready4ONE 5,400]

wrong yet again.

the assembly to launch the missile is different than the missile. if the assembly (tube) is nonfunctional (per definition of nonfunctional), then the act of loading a live missile into the tube will result in the tube getting heavier. the tube will not launch the missile.

the act of launching a live missile from a nonfunctional tube will be simple ... how far can you throw it.

Are you insane? Or just like to pretend so on chat boards. Time for you to find someone who gives two halves of a dookie for you to play with.

Peace out!

[decocker 7,198]

Time for you to find someone who gives two halves of a dookie for you to play with.

two halves of a dookie makes a whole dookie!

[natty bumppo 297]

1359751591[/url]' post='5954589']

Are you insane? Or just like to pretend so on chat boards. Time for you to find someone who gives two halves of a dookie for you to play with.

Peace out!

So besides telling me in previous posts to to "FY" and now call me insane etc ...

1359643684[/url]' post='5952020']

Dear Natty,

All stinger missile launchers, in fact all missile launchers, are by definition 'non-functional' so why don't you take a moment and then go FY?

You have totally failed to address the provided dictionary definitions which are in alignment with industry definitions of the word nonfunctional. We've read your extremist "chicken little the sky is falling" type posts in regards to product usage and assemblies. It's very obvious mechanical assemblies are not you forte.

Enjoy your little world.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

wrong yet again.

the assembly to launch the missile is different than the missile. if the assembly (tube) is nonfunctional (per definition of nonfunctional), then the act of loading a live missile into the tube will result in the tube getting heavier. the tube will not launch the missile.

the act of launching a live missile from a nonfunctional tube will be simple ... how far can you throw it.

So our arms are, in fact, CORDLESS MISSILE LAUNCHERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Obviously we need to be DIS-armed!!!!!

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

California doesn't need the crappy gas coming from Texas. I believe only PG&E buys it, because it is cheaper, and burns with lower BTU's per c.f., so it is a way for them to maximize their profits. Meanwhile, SoCal Gas Co is finding plenty of reserves in the more populous southern part of the state, not to mention how much gas is being brought down from Canada and Alaska.

You are buying gas from Kip?

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

You are buying gas from Kip?

I buy my natural gas from PG&E.

[himher 634]

<yawn> OK, sure

The watersheds that supply drinking water to 80% of California’s resident cover almost 157

million acres and span 8 states.

This from published data from the Nature Conservancy of California. I'm not a hotshot RV tech but I can figure out that moochers who collect $1.09 from the feds for every $1 paid and depend on all the states around them to support their basic needs are not really in a position to tell the rest of us how to conduct our business.

With this said California probably stands as the poster child of the concept that you cannot spend and borrow your way into prosperity. In spite of hundreds of billions of dollars spent to drain wetlands in one place to create wetlands in other places and hundreds of thousands of jobs created to invest in huge infrastructure projects to support a fake "economy" the net result is an entire stateful of moochers who hold on the state level 20% of the 50-state cumulative debt and 12% of the total population.

The best known gift from California to the rest of us is probably gang signs

Methane from Titan has the same heating value as methane from Texas or California. It is not possible to burn gas that has a higher heating value per SCF unless there is a higher carbon value per SCF and a higher carbon value per SCF means higher CO2 emissions per SCF. It figures Californians, who leads the nation in general environmental mouthiness, would quietly celebrate their "higher heating value gas".

LOL

Yep - From the rest of the state, and from its share of the water from the Colorado river.