Gun buy back turns into gun show

[Karee 4,191]

What assumption did I make again?

Just because I support the Democratic party does not mean you can tell me what I do or don't believe because "most Dems" believe it.

I don't know everyone's beliefs, of course. It would be impossible to keep track of. However, I don't go telling people what they DO believe based on the party they happen to support. I suggest you do the same.

Evylin supports voter ID laws, so there is hope for her yet. She doesn't seem to be your typical commie invader from up north.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

So understand this is public forum each post is not for a single individual.

If you don't fit the bill of "MOST DEMS" than move on.

You made the "most Dems" statement after you made the decision to tell me what I am for and against.

If you aren't directly speaking to a single individual, don't quote their post and use the word "you" so much.

Think before you post in this public forum so you don't look so ridiculous.

Evylin supports voter ID laws, so there is hope for her yet. She doesn't seem to be your typical commie invader from up north.

I was always required to show ID to prove identity and residence when voting in a federal election. Just makes sense to me!

[Harsh_77 718]

You made the "most Dems" statement after you made the decision to tell me what I am for and against.

If you aren't directly speaking to a single individual, don't quote their post and use the word "you" so much.

Think before you post in this public forum so you don't look so ridiculous.

I was always required to show ID to prove identity and residence when voting in a federal election. Just makes sense to me!

Go read the orig post my response was not even to any of your post, you were the one who jumped on my post.

You were the one who selected only couple lines from orign post and started the post.

So go and re-read your own post.

[natty bumppo 297]

I live in the area and it is a true story. Private sales with no background checks did take place at the Seattle buy back. Lovely!

The OP is a bit exaggerated though. Many guns were taken off the streets including a hand held missile launcher.

functional or was it a decoration piece?

[Penny Lane 8,159]

Go read the orig post my response was not even to any of your post, you were the one who jumped on my post.

You were the one who selected only couple lines from orign post and started the post.

So go and re-read your own post.

Are you nuts?

That was in direct response to me, telling me what I do and don't believe in. And you were incorrect. Don't make assumptions.

Edited January 29, 2013 by Evylin

[Harsh_77 718]

Are you nuts?

That was in direct response to me, telling me what I do and don't believe in. And you were incorrect. Don't make assumptions.

This is not the orignal post, there was a post before this which was my response to Mr.BigDog and you jumped in with your response to that.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

This is not the orignal post, there was a post before this which was my response to Mr.BigDog and you jumped in with your response to that.

I'm not talking about the original post or what you said to someone else, I'm talking about what you said to me. Are you being this obtuse on purpose or can you not help yourself?

[decocker 7,198]

I live in the area and it is a true story. Private sales with no background checks did take place at the Seattle buy back. Lovely!

The OP is a bit exaggerated though. Many guns were taken off the streets including a hand held missile launcher.

i don't doubt the article is true. everything alex jones/infowars/prison planet puts out there is based in truth. it's just truth drenched in complete hysteria. hence the op coming off exaggerated

[^_^ 5,021]

I'm not talking about the original post or what you said to someone else, I'm talking about what you said to me. Are you being this obtuse on purpose or can you not help yourself?

He just doesn't know how to communicate with other human beings.

[Harsh_77 718]

[quote name=' timestamp='1359493009' post='5948487]

He just doesn't know how to communicate with other human beings.

Yea I am learning for you guys.

First you need to get a name... than teach ppl to communicate.

Edited January 29, 2013 by Harsh_77

[Harsh_77 718]

I'm not talking about the original post or what you said to someone else, I'm talking about what you said to me. Are you being this obtuse on purpose or can you not help yourself?

Go read post #24 you were the one who selected couple lines from my post and quoted back on it.

[^_^ 5,021]

Yea I am learning for you guys.

As I see it, you have two difficulties.

First - your written English is very bad. Mine is bad too but yours is worse.

Second - you have no idea how to interact with other human beings. I suspect you are accustomed to an environment where you are never challenged, where your assertions are never questioned.

If you are using P&R as a means of remediating these deficiencies, more power to you. I wish you success.

Edited January 29, 2013 by ^_^

[Harsh_77 718]

[quote name=' timestamp='1359493458' post='5948511]

As I see it, you have two difficulties.

First - your written English is very bad. Mine is bad too but yours is worse.

Second - you have no idea how to interact with other human beings. I suspect you are accustomed to an environment where you are never challenged, where your assertions are never questioned.

If you are using P&R as a means of remediating these deficiencies, more power to you. I wish you success.

Thanks for your wishes ....

[Penny Lane 8,159]

Go read post #24 you were the one who selected couple lines from my post and quoted back on it.

I quoted your post. I said legal gun owners shouldn't have problems with background checks. You made a comment that sellers or buyers shouldn't have undue hardship, I posted an example of "undue hardship" put upon people for much less than buying a gun.

You decided to take THAT post and tell me that I'm against voter ID laws.

You were wrong. Don't assume things. The end.

If you don't get it, there's no other way for me to break that down for you.

[Harsh_77 718]

I quoted your post. I said legal gun owners shouldn't have problems with background checks. You made a comment that sellers or buyers shouldn't have undue hardship, I posted an example of "undue hardship" put upon people for much less than buying a gun.

You decided to take THAT post and tell me that I'm against voter ID laws.

You were wrong. Don't assume things. The end.

If you don't get it, there's no other way for me to break that down for you.

You should post your details and your agrreement or disagreement on each issue.

You were the one who was trying to prove that one has to go thru hardship to get med so it should be ok for the gun owners to go thru the hardship as well.