Gabrielle Giffords and husband launch anti-gun violence site

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

Who is trying to take away the guns from the legal, responsible gun owners that conceal and carry? Anyone? No.

You sound totally clueless on this subject. The people like Bloomberg that are backing this ####### are totally anti gun and have went out of their way to ban guns from anyone and everyone. Read up on the names behind this. If that weren't the case then the NRA wouldn't have had to spend millions taking some of these anti US Constitution anti gun wingnuts to court over and over again.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

You sound totally clueless on this subject. The people like Bloomberg that are backing this ####### are totally anti gun and have went out of their way to ban guns from anyone and everyone. Read up on the names behind this. If that weren't the case then the NRA wouldn't have had to spend millions taking some of these anti US Constitution anti gun wingnuts to court over and over again.

What an original response!

Tone down the paranoia. You can still cuddle with your guns at night. I promise.

Edited January 8, 2013 by Evylin

[Harsh_77 718]

Who is trying to take away the guns from the legal, responsible gun owners that conceal and carry? Anyone? No.

If the point is not to take away the gun, than what’s the point of creating such website and Bloomberg jumping in and Biden running this circus about Gun control?

Even before the CT incident, Bloomberg has been pushing for no Guns for civilians, only ppl he wants to have gun is police officer and military, he is just using the CT incident for his personal political agenda.

[Usui Takumi 1,562]

If the point is not to take away the gun, than what’s the point of creating such website and Bloomberg jumping in and Biden running this circus about Gun control?

Even before the CT incident, Bloomberg has been pushing for no Guns for civilians, only ppl he wants to have gun is police officer and military, he is just using the CT incident for his personal political agenda.

Bloomberg is an extremist, but I'm one to wait until after the panel along with the introduction of DF's latest bill.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

If the point is not to take away the gun, than what’s the point of creating such website and Bloomberg jumping in and Biden running this circus about Gun control?

Even before the CT incident, Bloomberg has been pushing for no Guns for civilians, only ppl he wants to have gun is police officer and military, he is just using the CT incident for his personal political agenda.

I'm not talking about Bloomberg. He's a nut for various reasons. Giffords is a gun owner. She clearly has no issues with legal, responsible gun ownership. Why does everyone automatically think that if people want some gun control reform, that everyone's going to be stripped of their guns?

Why so paranoid?

[Harsh_77 718]

What an original response!

Tone down the paranoia. You can still cuddle with your guns at night. I promise.

You can call paranoia if that makes you happy.

Some ppl have this complete confidence in the govt and military that they would never overtake a sovereign republic.

Unfortunately history have proven time over time that such confidence is shattered and take over does happen.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

You can call paranoia if that makes you happy.

Some ppl have this complete confidence in the govt and military that they would never overtake a sovereign republic.

Unfortunately history have proven time over time that such confidence is shattered and take over does happen.

... Okay.

[Harsh_77 718]

Bloomberg is an extremist, but I'm one to wait until after the panel along with the introduction of DF's latest bill.

DF is also another person who just rambles about Gun control.

I am not sure why they would not want to fix the root cause of the problem, but just attack the Gun owner and confine Gun owner's right.

There was no comment from media when Arnold made a comment violent movies and video games have no effect on younger generation.

My point is where were anti gun lobby that time?

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

rational discussion. enforce existing laws first. no more plea away ...

Gotta close loopholes first. No point in having mandatory background checks at a gun retailer if one can walk across the street to a gun show and buy w/o that burden or just go online and get a gun on ones good word. There either is a background check requirement or there isn't. Right now, there isn't because the NRA and the rest of the bloody gun lobby has worked their butts off to make sure that people that can't pass background checks still have easy and ready access to firearms all over the country. That needs to change. Enforcing existing laws isn't going to do the trick.

Edited January 9, 2013 by Mr. Big Dog