Miltary Newspapers: Rumsfeld Must Go

[Trompe le Monde 1,107]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15552211/from/RS.1/

Notable extracts:

The military publications' editorial also painted a grim view of the situation in Iraq, saying, "despite the best efforts of American trainers, the problem of molding a viciously sectarian population into anything resembling a force for national unity has become a losing proposition.

Kenneth Adelman, who served on the Defense Policy Board with Perle, said Bush, Defense Rumsfeld and others in the administration "turned out to be among the most incompetent teams in the postwar era. Not only did each of them, individually, have enormous flaws, but together they were deadly, dysfunctional."

In the editorial, the military papers quote Army Gen. John Abizaid, chief of U.S. Central Command, as saying to a Senate Armed Services Committee in September, "I believe that the sectarian violence is probably as bad as I've seen it ... and that if not stopped, it is possible that Iraq could move towards a civil war."

Damn liberals!

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Dirty, Damn, Liberals!

[Ban Hammer 13,335]

just as i thought, it's newspapers geared to the military that are saying this, not "military newspapers" as the military does not make such.

[GaryC 7]

Those papers are owned by Gannet publishing. It has no more credibility than the NYTimes. And they DO NOT speak for the military. Just another pre-election hit piece.

[kaydee457 13]

Those papers are owned by Gannet publishing. It has no more credibility than the NYTimes. And they DO NOT speak for the military. Just another pre-election hit piece.

[almaty 19]

In the editorial, the military papers quote Army Gen. John Abizaid, chief of U.S. Central Command, as saying to a Senate Armed Services Committee in September, "I believe that the sectarian violence is probably as bad as I've seen it ... and that if not stopped, it is possible that Iraq could move towards a civil war."

i am sure he is bias too

[rclouse 0]

Those papers are owned by Gannet publishing. It has no more credibility than the NYTimes. And they DO NOT speak for the military. Just another pre-election hit piece.

Damned liberal media!