Can my I-130 the place of I-129F in line?

[AmyWrites 593]

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE post again with your NOA2'!

[Cathi 5,744]

It's hilarious...how you are in arms!lol.lol

and its hilarious that you will be denied both

[Sirdaniel42 86]

Ok when they both get approved I will post copies here for you. Thanks.

[Berty 74]

I suppose I'm wondering why the OP bothered to post here, and I'm not saying that in a dismissive way; it's just they asked for advice and then said no, they were going to do it their way regardless. So... why create the thread if they're so sure of themselves?

Edited the last part out because really, the first two sentences are all that's needed.

Edited December 18, 2012 by Berty

[hamigirl710 112]

Thank you Grant PDX. You have provided the best sentiment thus far: "Advice can be given but cannot be forced on anyone". We made our decision and we are sticking with it. We will come tell the forum when both petitions are approved! We appreciate all the kind wishes!!!

It is possible that the USCIS might slip up and miss the fact that you have 2 petitions going at the same time and maybe even approve the I129f...but it is your responsibility to advise them that you are married and plan to go the I130 route. If by chance you get an interview for the I129f and attend it you will be misrepresenting your situation and there is a lifetime ban for misrepresentation.

With that said, you are of your own mind and best of luck to you!

Edited December 18, 2012 by hamigirl710

[Lonelywithouthim 5]

Thank you Grant PDX. You have provided the best sentiment thus far: "Advice can be given but cannot be forced on anyone". We made our decision and we are sticking with it. We will come tell the forum when both petitions are approved! We appreciate all the kind wishes!!!

I was also thinking of getting married but wasn't clear as to what will become of my K-1 petition. So I emailed the embassy with the question.

my questions: can I marry my Fiance' at this time and will it effect his pending case?

Reply from Embassy: "Please note that you are free to marry and that is a personal decision. However once you married the fiance petition will not be valid and you will need to file another petition for your spouse."

Sincerely,

Immigrant Visa Unit

Consular Section

Good Luck to you both!

[Boggy1974 124]

It's hilarious to see the venom in ppl and up in arms over personal decision! We are the 2percenters!! This topic is hot! hahahahaha...

[CJ8611 6]

I think the OP might be referring to a K3, not a K1. In their timeline, it states they got married in 2009. The way the question was posted is really confusing. Plus the fact that they filed for the I-129F prior to the I-130 when it should have been the other way around. One would really think he was applying for a K1 given his post, and he did not bother correct it (or I may be wrong). But then again, he posted in the K-1 forum. Anyhow, one sends in the K-3 application after the NOA1 is received for the I-130 application, right? So I don't know how this would pan out for them since they did not follow the process. My assumption might be wrong though.

Edited December 19, 2012 by CJ8611

[Hypnos 6,576]

It's not a personal decision anymore than filing taxes is a personal decision; it's the law.

You threaten both of your applications by mis-filing in this way. At best nobody will notice (although it may come to light months or even years down the line - any benefits you obtain from USCIS up to and including citizenship can be revoked if they were incorrectly given), at worst both of your applications will be rejected.

Why you would ask for advice and then spurn it is beyond me, but at the end of the day the only time you will lose is yours if you have to refile again in a year's time following the denial of your applications, or worse, need to hire a lawyer to file a waiver for material misrepresentation.

Your I-129F for a K-1 cannot be correctly approved because it is for people who are unmarried and you are now married. I cannot put it in simpler terms than that.

Edited December 19, 2012 by Hypnos

[san diego 407]

Guys)) stop answering. It is clear that he is trolling. He cannot be serious or that careless. No one in normal state of mind would do what he is talking about.

Edited December 19, 2012 by san diego

[Enigma11561 336]

Guys)) stop answering. It is clear that he is trolling. He cannot be serious or that careless. No one in normal state of mind would do what he is talking about.

I would tend to agree.No normal way of thinking would allow themselves to do this.In the OP's mind it is all a game to see if he can better the government.I do not think he is that serious about his relationship to put that motion to a test. I am going with TROLL and moving on myself.

[rade2rising 205]

good luck on your journey

[AmyWrites 593]

Guys)) stop answering. It is clear that he is trolling. He cannot be serious or that careless. No one in normal state of mind would do what he is talking about.

Or he's one of the apparently many people who believe they are above the law.

[Boggy1974 124]

I or we are sticking with our personal decision. No amount of insult(s) will change it! Thanks for the advice but we are free to reject it. Very last post. We moved on! Thanks! We will start another thread with a hot hot topic! Thanks and goodluck to you all! Thanks but no thanks for the advice.

[Ban Hammer 13,282]

I or we are sticking with our personal decision. No amount of insult(s) will change it! Thanks for the advice but we are free to reject it. Very last post. We moved on! Thanks! We will start another thread with a hot hot topic! Thanks and goodluck to you all! Thanks but no thanks for the advice.

i'll take that as a request to close this thread.