Oregon mall shooting leaves 3 dead, including shooter

[Harsh_77 718]

If you cannot come to terms with less guns and tougher gun laws equating to fewer gun deaths, then no, you are not being realistic.

Look at earlier post the study says otherwise.

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

What was classless about what Teddy just posted? It couldn't have been the shiny object, since you do it on a daily basis and that would be hypocritical.

Why are you even posting on this thread? Learn how to ride a bike before attempting to fly a plane.

Iv'e yet to see you post anything related to this topic on here. btw the shiny object teddy posted wasn't my issue with his post.

Edited December 12, 2012 by Bad_Daddy

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

edited

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

and how do you eliminate the 'azzhat's' access? come on say it. you can do it.

I don't give a flying **. I'd just rather they don't have guns. I'd rather we don't have thousands of innocent people die each year just so people who should not have access to guns can have all the fcuking guns they want to get their hands on. The right to life is more important to me than the right to hoard sports equipment.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

Why are you even posting on this thread? Learn how to ride a bike before attempting to fly a plane.

Iv'e yet to see you post anything related to this topic on here.

I started this topic and I have had plenty of discussion in it in the first few pages. Contrary to what you believe, you don't get to dictate who posts where, nor do you get to dictate who responds to what you post. Play forum police somewhere else.

Your only answer to me is always posting that shiny object you love or implying that I should go post somewhere else. Get new material or be prepared to be called a hypocrite when you throw a fit about someone else's posts.

Edited December 12, 2012 by Evylin

[Karee 4,190]

I don't give a flying **. I'd just rather they don't have guns. I'd rather we don't have thousands of innocent people die each year just so people who should not have access to guns can have all the fcuking guns they want to get their hands on. The right to life is more important to me than the right to hoard sports equipment.

Time for a constitutional amendment then.

[Harsh_77 718]

If I left the keys in the ignition, yes. That is known as "implied permission". You would not be charged with auto theft, only "joy riding".

Have you heard of something called bait car?

Lot of police use that and ppl are booked with theft not joy ride.

[SMOKE 1,426]

I don't give a flying **. I'd just rather they don't have guns. I'd rather we don't have thousands of innocent people die each year just so people who should not have access to guns can have all the fcuking guns they want to get their hands on. The right to life is more important to me than the right to hoard sports equipment.

say it!...don't use 'right to life' its beyond hypocritical, considering your stance on infantcide.

[Karee 4,190]

Well it's official, this one has went off the rails. See everyone in another thread.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Time for a constitutional amendment then.

Why? Because there are conflicting rights in the document? There are plenty of those conflicts in there. The right to free speech does not include the right to induce panic and cause injury or death by shouting "FIRE" in a move theater. One right stops where it infringes on another. It's not hard. All it takes is some common sense.

[Harsh_77 718]

I don't give a flying **. I'd just rather they don't have guns. I'd rather we don't have thousands of innocent people die each year just so people who should not have access to guns can have all the fcuking guns they want to get their hands on. The right to life is more important to me than the right to hoard sports equipment.

Basically you mean you dont care about constitution nor rights of the people.

That is no different than dictatorship.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Basically you mean you dont care about constitution nor rights of the people.

Basically, you haven't understood a thing. See my comment above.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Time for a constitutional amendment then.

How about calling a Constitutional Convention, and going for the general overhaul?

According to Article V, Congress must call for an amendment-proposing convention, “on the application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States”, and therefore 34 state legislatures would have to submit applications. Once an Article V convention has proposed amendments, then each of those amendments would have to be ratified by three-fourths of the states (i.e. 38 states) in order to become part of the Constitution.

[Harsh_77 718]

Well it's official, this one has went off the rails. See everyone in another thread.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Have you heard of something called bait car?

Lot of police use that and ppl are booked with theft not joy ride.

BAIT CARS ARE ENTRAPMENT

Criminal Defense Attorney James Dickson Crock, Daytona Beach

"Is the use of bait cars entrapment? Absolutely.

"Think about the definition of law enforcement. Cops are there to enforce the law. To stop crime. And apprehend those who violate law. Police are not there to create crimes.

"The individual who's arrested in a bait car did not have intent to commit crime until law enforcement created the opportunity. It's like having a great-looking undercover female police officer on the corner, [dressed as a prostitute] who's hoping to solicit an inquiry. They're creating crime. There may not have been any intent until he saw the attractive police woman, until the cops lured him into the trap.

"Police chiefs and elected sheriffs know how to play the 6pm news. You need video.

"It's especially egregious to arrest a first-time offender. With kids, having a car is a major status symbol. The keys are there in the ignition. 'Let's go for a joy ride.' Bait cars play to natural impulses of teens, who don't have same kind of judgment as adults."

http://www.trutv.com/shows/bait_car/debate_car.html

California "grand theft auto" (GTA), also referred to as "auto theft", "vehicle theft", or "joyriding" may be charged as a misdemeanor or as a felony. The seriousness of the charge depends on (1) the circumstance of your case, and (2) whether you have any similar prior convictions.

Two California laws address the theft of automobiles:

California Penal Code 487(d)(1) PC -- Grand Theft Auto or GTA -- considered the more serious of these offenses, and

California Vehicle Code 10851 VC -- The Unlawful Taking or Driving of a Vehicle (also sometimes called "joyriding")1.

http://www.shouselaw.com/grandtheft-auto.html

Edited December 12, 2012 by The Patriot