TERRORISTS HOPE FOR DEMOCRATIC WIN!

[mawilson 2,133]

Who is Jesus Pbuh?

it is Jesus (pbuh)....look it up on google

Google gives me some ####### about Jesus and Islam -- #######?!

[peezey 0]

Who is Jesus Pbuh?

it is Jesus (pbuh)....look it up on google

Google gives me some ####### about Jesus and Islam -- #######?!

Muslims, when refering to the prophet Jesus (and other important prophets) use pbuh====peace be upon him

Edited November 3, 2006 by peezey

[Ban Hammer 13,630]

Fukk it. I'm too confused about how to beat the terrorists through the U.S. election process. I'm just writing in "Osama" in every blank.

expect a visit from guys in suits with no sense of humor

[Carol&Marc 0]

Fukk it. I'm too confused about how to beat the terrorists through the U.S. election process. I'm just writing in "Osama" in every blank.

expect a visit from guys in suits with no sense of humor

Lets hope so.

so what should we do...keep the republicans in power and watch more people die? Cause that's all I'm seeing now. I'm tired of these scaretactics. It didn't work then and it won't work now.

So if the Dems get elected the dying will stop?

Nope, they will exchange our guys weapons for white flags.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

so what should we do...keep the republicans in power and watch more people die? Cause that's all I'm seeing now. I'm tired of these scaretactics. It didn't work then and it won't work now.

So if the Dems get elected the dying will stop?

Nope, they will exchange our guys weapons for white flags.

It will continue regardless of who is in office, no?

Edited November 3, 2006 by erekose

[Ban Hammer 13,630]

so what should we do...keep the republicans in power and watch more people die? Cause that's all I'm seeing now. I'm tired of these scaretactics. It didn't work then and it won't work now.

So if the Dems get elected the dying will stop?

Nope, they will exchange our guys weapons for white flags.

It will continue regardless of who is in office, no?

but will your voice, steven's, and others be so loud in condemnation if the president is democrat?

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

so what should we do...keep the republicans in power and watch more people die? Cause that's all I'm seeing now. I'm tired of these scaretactics. It didn't work then and it won't work now.

So if the Dems get elected the dying will stop?

Nope, they will exchange our guys weapons for white flags.

It will continue regardless of who is in office, no?

but will your voice, steven's, and others be so loud in condemnation if the president is democrat?

I'm not party affiliated (nor am I that shallow) so yes.

[Ban Hammer 13,630]

but will your voice, steven's, and others be so loud in condemnation if the president is democrat?

I'm not party affiliated (nor am I that shallow) so yes.

for some reason i'm doubting you..........

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

but will your voice, steven's, and others be so loud in condemnation if the president is democrat?

I'm not party affiliated (nor am I that shallow) so yes.

for some reason i'm doubting you..........

Course you don't, but that's probably due to personal bias than anything I've actually said.

I've made it no secret I dislike the current bunch - but I'm not too enthralled by the 'effective opposition' either.

[Ban Hammer 13,630]

I've made it no secret I dislike the current bunch - but I'm not too enthralled by the 'effective opposition' either.

yet 99.9% of your airtime is spent on bush....making the "opposition" comment rather moot.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I've made it no secret I dislike the current bunch - but I'm not too enthralled by the 'effective opposition' either.

yet 99.9% of your airtime is spent on bush....making the "opposition" comment rather moot.

Well I really don't like the guy, and it's not really a secret, is it. The opposition, at this point are irrelevant - and there is a lack of balance in the debates (on any issue) which are dominated by extremist, screaming idealogues.

In any case, who better than me knows what "I" believe. You can disagree, and I'm sure you will.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

so what should we do...keep the republicans in power and watch more people die? Cause that's all I'm seeing now. I'm tired of these scaretactics. It didn't work then and it won't work now.

So if the Dems get elected the dying will stop?

Nope, they will exchange our guys weapons for white flags.

It will continue regardless of who is in office, no?

but will your voice, steven's, and others be so loud in condemnation if the president is democrat?

You can count on it... if it's merited.

[DeadPoolX 9]

What I'd like to see is either a Republican president and a Democrat-controlled Congress or a Democrat president and a Republican-controlled Congress. Basically, if that happened, nothing would get done. I like that.

The less the federal government intrudes in our life, the better off we all in the United States -- and probably around the world. The more time the president and congress spend bickering with each other, the less chance they have to put into effective more psychotic laws and enforce them.

The problem with the current situation is that there's a Republican president and a Republican-controlled Congress. While there is opposition, most of what is wanted goes through the House of Representatives and the Senate and onto President Bush (who, by the way, has never vetoed a bill).

I have always voted Republican, although I consider myself more of a Libertarian. Unfortunately, the Libertarian party is a little extreme in some of its views and voting for it is -- more or less -- a waste of a vote since the U.S. is, for all intents and purposes, a two-party system.

I'm not too fond of either Republican or Democratic contenders for the presidency in 2008. None of them seem like they'd be a good fit. Oh well. So long as Hillary Clinton doesn't become president, I'll be happy.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

What I'd like to see is either a Republican president and a Democrat-controlled Congress or a Democrat president and a Republican-controlled Congress. Basically, if that happened, nothing would get done. I like that.

The less the federal government intrudes in our life, the better off we all in the United States -- and probably around the world. The more time the president and congress spend bickering with each other, the less chance they have to put into effective more psychotic laws and enforce them.

The problem with the current situation is that there's a Republican president and a Republican-controlled Congress. While there is opposition, most of what is wanted goes through the House of Representatives and the Senate and onto President Bush (who, by the way, has never vetoed a bill).

I have always voted Republican, although I consider myself more of a Libertarian. Unfortunately, the Libertarian party is a little extreme in some of its views and voting for it is -- more or less -- a waste of a vote since the U.S. is, for all intents and purposes, a two-party system.

I'm not too fond of either Republican or Democratic contenders for the presidency in 2008. None of them seem like they'd be a good fit. Oh well. So long as Hillary Clinton doesn't become president, I'll be happy.

Things could get done, but it requires bipartisanship...something we've seemed to have lost since the Rebublicans have been in power.

[Ban Hammer 13,630]

You can count on it... if it's merited.

i won't hold my breath