Jump to content
one...two...tree

O’Reilly: Black Voters Don’t Believe In ‘Self Reliance’ Or ‘American Exceptionalism’

 Share

83 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline

Since the night of the election, Bill O'Reilly has been looking for a scapegoat on whom he can blame Mitt Romney's loss. He seems to have found one in African American, Latino, and female voters.

Before all the votes were even cast on November 6, O'Reilly came out with the theory that "The white establishment is now the minority," and that women, black, and Latino voters are "non-traditional" voters who "feel that they are entitled to things and which candidate, between the two, is going to give them things?"

On his show last night, O'Reilly responded to comedian Jon Stewart's criticism that mourning "traditional voters" is latent racism. But in his rebuttal, O'Reilly explained that the mass turnout of voters of color signaled an end to "traditional American voters." The new voters, he argued, don't understand "traditional American values":

If you look at the exit polling, you'll see that a coalition of voters put the President back into the oval office.
That coalition was non-tradition, which means it veered away from things like traditional marriage, robust capitalism, and self reliance
. Instead, each constituency that voted for the President —
whether it be single women, Hispanic Americans, African Americans, whatever
— had very specific reasons for doing so. [...]

Traditional American voters generally want a smaller government in Washington, more local control, some oversight on abortion, and
believe in American exceptionalism.

O'Reilly isn't new to making racially charged comments. Just days before the election, he speculated that Sec. of State Colin Powell cut Obama "
" in his endorsement of him because they are both black. He's also claimed that Democrats have made black people "
" on the government.

Edited by Lincolns mullet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Canada
Timeline

The truth bothers you, doesn't it Steven?

Funny part being is that you don't see the painfully in your face racism of the Democratic party to keep people down. All you get mad at is the fact that someone has the balls to point it out. Too funny really.

nfrsig.jpg

The Great Canadian to Texas Transfer Timeline:

2/22/2010 - I-129F Packet Mailed

2/24/2010 - Packet Delivered to VSC

2/26/2010 - VSC Cashed Filing Fee

3/04/2010 - NOA1 Received!

8/14/2010 - Touched!

10/04/2010 - NOA2 Received!

10/25/2010 - Packet 3 Received!

02/07/2011 - Medical!

03/15/2011 - Interview in Montreal! - Approved!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Monaco
Timeline

[quote name=^_^' timestamp='1353427214' post='5833721]

In other words, GOP voters are 'traditional Americans' and Democratic voters are not.

This is a preview into the GOP strategy going forward, as America 'browns'.

The elections are over and Obama cannot be reelected, so there is no reason for them to hide the racism upon which their dislike for the POTUS is based.

they_mad__oh__they_mad__by_silverslayer3147-d4nm7xm.jpg

200px-FSM_Logo.svg.png


www.ffrf.org




Link to comment
Share on other sites

The truth bothers you, doesn't it Steven?

Funny part being is that you don't see the painfully in your face racism of the Democratic party to keep people down. All you get mad at is the fact that someone has the balls to point it out. Too funny really.

So I guess you are saying that, if you aren't white, you aren't american?

“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.” – Coretta Scott King

"Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge." -Toni Morrison

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

President-Obama-jpg.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since the night of the election, Bill O'Reilly has been looking for a scapegoat on whom he can blame Mitt Romney's loss. He seems to have found one in African American, Latino, and female voters.

Before all the votes were even cast on November 6, O'Reilly came out with the theory that "The white establishment is now the minority," and that women, black, and Latino voters are "non-traditional" voters who "feel that they are entitled to things and which candidate, between the two, is going to give them things?"

On his show last night, O'Reilly responded to comedian Jon Stewart's criticism that mourning "traditional voters" is latent racism. But in his rebuttal, O'Reilly explained that the mass turnout of voters of color signaled an end to "traditional American voters." The new voters, he argued, don't understand "traditional American values":

If you look at the exit polling, you'll see that a coalition of voters put the President back into the oval office.
That coalition was non-tradition, which means it veered away from things like traditional marriage, robust capitalism, and self reliance
. Instead, each constituency that voted for the President —
whether it be single women, Hispanic Americans, African Americans, whatever
— had very specific reasons for doing so. [...]

Traditional American voters generally want a smaller government in Washington, more local control, some oversight on abortion, and
believe in American exceptionalism.

O'Reilly isn't new to making racially charged comments. Just days before the election, he speculated that Sec. of State Colin Powell cut Obama "
" in his endorsement of him because they are both black. He's also claimed that Democrats have made black people "
" on the government.

So African Americans Latinos and women voted for Romney in big numbers. I am confused ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm white, middle class, and I didn't vote for Rmoney. Guess I am not a good American. Jeez!

I also voted against traditional marriage, but for few local County level Republicans. Perhaps voting and voters are more complex than No Spin Bill's theory?

B and J K-1 story

  • April 2004 met online
  • July 16, 2006 Met in person on her birthday in United Arab Emirates
  • August 4, 2006 sent certified mail I-129F packet Neb SC
  • August 9, 2006 NOA1
  • August 21, 2006 received NOA1 in mail
  • October 4, 5, 7, 13 & 17 2006 Touches! 50 day address change... Yes Judith is beautiful, quit staring at her passport photo and approve us!!! Shaming works! LOL
  • October 13, 2006 NOA2! November 2, 2006 NOA2? Huh? NVC already processed and sent us on to Abu Dhabi Consulate!
  • February 12, 2007 Abu Dhabi Interview SUCCESS!!! February 14 Visa in hand!
  • March 6, 2007 she is here!
  • MARCH 14, 2007 WE ARE MARRIED!!!
  • May 5, 2007 Sent AOS/EAD packet
  • May 11, 2007 NOA1 AOS/EAD
  • June 7, 2007 Biometrics appointment
  • June 8, 2007 first post biometrics touch, June 11, next touch...
  • August 1, 2007 AOS Interview! APPROVED!! EAD APPROVED TOO...
  • August 6, 2007 EAD card and Welcome Letter received!
  • August 13, 2007 GREEN CARD received!!! 375 days since mailing the I-129F!

    Remove Conditions:

  • May 1, 2009 first day to file
  • May 9, 2009 mailed I-751 to USCIS CS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The elections are over and Obama cannot be reelected, so there is no reason for them to hide the racism upon which their dislike for the POTUS is based.

they_mad__oh__they_mad__by_silverslayer3147-d4nm7xm.jpg

well there you have it folks. If you don't like Obama your racist..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well there you have it folks. If you don't like Obama your racist..

Not everybody who doesn't like Obama is racist.

Same way not everybody who DOES like Obama is depending on the government for handouts, just wants free stuff, and doesn't care about personal responsibility. Yet I only see Republicans get mad when THEY are the ones stereotyped incorrectly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

did anybody else notice, the only people bring race into the discussion are obama supporters?

OP: your thread title is a lie.

In this thread, yes. But there have been plenty where Romney supporters/Republicans/anti-Obama people have brought it up first. There were countless articles posted about how black people/other minorities are only for Obama because of their dependence on government. And it wasn't Obama supporters posting that garbage.

Yet you never complain about those.

Edited by Evylin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...