Jump to content

1 post in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline
Posted

Ran across this opinion piece in today's paper and thought I'd share it:

The audacity of mendacity

Ruth_Daniel_wp_49231a.jpg

By Daniel Ruth, Times Columnist

From the mouth of a political apparatchik a smidgen of truth was actually uttered.

It was not that long ago Mitt Romney pollster Neil Newhouse offered up a rare moment of candor.

After being confronted by reporters covering the Joe Isuzu campaign with numerous inaccurate, false and misleading statements being dished up by the candidate, Newhouse responded by declaring the Romney team was ''not going to let our campaign be dictated by fact-checkers."

At least on this point, the Romney campaign has been consistent.

In the waning days of the campaign, Romney approved a commercial breathlessly claiming that General Motors and Chrysler, which received federal bailout money, were moving autoworker jobs away from places like Ohio to (cue The Internationale) China.

Both corporations denied any such plan was in the works and various irritating fact-check organizations such as the Tampa Bay Times' PolitiFact ladled Pants On Fire ratings upon the advertisement for its total disregard for the truth.

In this bitter campaign environment, Romney's 50 shades of bloviating managed to accomplish at least five ####### Cheneys, three Clifford Irvings and perhaps a few of Irwin Mainway's Bag O Glass.

This wasn't merely a campaign fudging a fact here, massaging a detail there. This was a commercial with less fealty to truth telling than a Glenn Beck radio show production meeting.

General Motors and Chrysler had to explain to a guy who claims to understand how business works that they were planning to open manufacturing operations in China to serve the Asian markets just as they do elsewhere around the world, while also adding American workers to plants in places such as Toledo.

And they were able to expand their businesses largely because the federal rescue of the auto industry, which Mitt Romney opposed, saved a vital economic institution.

This is also why companies like General Motors and Chrysler are referred to as multinational corporations. They probably even teach this stuff at Romney's alma mater, Harvard University.

So distorted was the Romney approved ad that a General Motors official suggested that it was "absolutely bereft of any fundamental understanding of the global automotive industry," hardly a ringing endorsement of a candidate who claims to be such an economic genius he makes Milton Friedman look like Three Card Monte hustler.

Romney could have insisted the commercial be shelved. He could have owned up to his role in perpetrating an advertising scam. He could have at least said "Oooops." He could have been an adult.

Instead, Romney has continued to air the debunked, deflated and defrocked ad. This would be a bit like the producers of Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter promoting it as the biggest box office hit of all time.

Please excuse a pinch of cynicism. But it's entirely likely Romney is happily willing to foist a fraudulent advertisement off on the public because he has made the calculation that people are gullible and will fall for any barnyard phooey that vaguely comports with what they want to believe.

In the end, it matters not a whit to the Romney campaign they are engaged in a scam that might be best described as the audacity of mendacity.

What matters is that as the campaign clock ticks down, Romney can scare the bejabbers out of as many voters as possible, especially in Ohio, to believe the corporations given federal tax dollars to survive are now looking for showroom space in Tiananmen Square for all those Jeeps.

It was during the Cheney administration when reporter Ron Suskind was told by a White House official that journalists were to be avoided because they were part of that nagging "reality-based community."

The good news is that if these same people can obviously find jobs shilling for the Baghdad Bob of Boston, perhaps the employment prospects for the rest of us back on Earth are not so bleak.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...