Obama’s Benghazi failure

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/26/obamas-benghazi-failure/

By Oliver North-The Washington Times

Friday, October 26, 2012

For more than a month, the Obama administration has been dodging and weaving over what actually transpired in Benghazi, Libya, on the night of Sept. 11-12. Questions have been posed about why Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens was there and not at his embassy post in Tripoli.

Congressional investigators have asked why he had no security detail, why the State Department decided not to send in U.S. Marine embassy security guards when they were offered months earlier, why contingency plans were not in place on the anniversary of Sept. 11, 2001, and why the O-Team insisted for so long that the attack on our U.S. diplomatic post was a “spontaneous event” and not an act of terrorism.

By now, all should realize that truthful answers to these inquiries will not be furnished by the White House or State Department until after the presidential election on Nov. 6. There is an even more important question that should be asked and answered now: Once the White House knew about the attack in Benghazi, what action did the president take to protect or save the lives of Americans?

“We the People” need to know the answer because we are about to hire — or rehire — a commander in chief. The response is crucial to determining whether the incumbent is competent to fulfill the responsibilities of the job or should be replaced. Fortunately, we have a standard of behavior for a commander in chief in a previous well-documented terror event: Ronald Reagan during the Achille Lauro incident.

On Oct. 7, 1985, four radical Islamic terrorists — members of the Palestine Liberation Front (PLF), the organization now calling itself Hamas — hijacked the Italian cruise ship Achille Lauro. They murdered Leon Klinghoffer, a wheelchair-bound American passenger. His only offense was that he was an American citizen and a Jew. That was offense enough to spark what the current administration might well call a “spontaneous event.”

Within minutes of the CIA alert that Americans were at risk — and before it was known that Klinghoffer was dead — a National Security Council-led counterterrorism task force was convened by secure conference call. From Air Force One en route to Chicago, President Reagan approved the first recommendation of the task force — deployment of a specially trained and equipped unit from the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) to the region. While the JSOC team was heading east from the United States, Reagan ordered every available U.S. military and intelligence asset in the eastern Mediterranean to find and track the vessel — and asked every littoral government in the area to deny port access to the hijackers. Despite abysmal weather conditions at sea, U.S. Navy and Air Force units located the cruise ship and followed it to Alexandria, Egypt.

When Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak lied to Reagan about the terrorists having escaped, we knew better. In those days, our relationship with the Israeli government was so good that its members informed us where the perpetrators were, the tail number of the EgyptAir commercial aircraft Mubarak had provided to fly them to Tunisia, and the takeoff time. The president immediately approved a plan crafted by the task force, the Joint Chiefs, the JSOC and the U.S. Navy’s 6th Fleet to intercept the civilian airliner and force it to land at the NATO air base at Sigonella, Italy. Less than four hours later, the terrorists and their ringleader — Abu Abbas, head of the PLF — were captured.

Contrast this scenario with what we now know from previously undisclosed emails exchanged among various Obama administration officials about what transpired in Benghazi. The White House apparently was notified within minutes of the attack’s launch on our consulate. From ground-based infrared cameras and live imagery from at least one unmanned aerial vehicle overhead, officials at the CIA, Pentagon, State Department and White House could see with extraordinary clarity what was going on as military assaults were mounted against the U.S. Consulate and then a nearby annex over the course of more than eight hours.

Unlike those during the Achille Lauro incident, the O-Team’s decision-makers knew precisely what was happening in real time in Benghazi. Yet they apparently did little more than wring their hands and stare at their widescreen monitors as Americans were dying.

In 1985, we had no real-time information other than what was provided by the Israelis or the scant information gleaned from the ship-to-shore radio-telephone calls by the terrorists to their chief, Abu Abbas. We had no unmanned aerial vehicles or live coverage. We had no prepositioned forces on the ground — the JSOC unit that captured the hijackers and turned them over to Italian authorities had to be flown to Sicily from the United States.

On Sept. 11, 2012, dozens of U.S. military aircraft were stationed within an hour’s flight time of Benghazi. A U.S. Marine contingent and a U.S. special operations unit were less than two hours away by air, remarkably enough, in Sigonella — the very place the Achille Lauro terrorists were captured. A White House spokesman now claims the O-Team couldn’t commit military force without “diplomatic clearance” from the Libyan government. Good thing that provision of international law doesn’t apply in Pakistan or Yemen.

Our current commander in chief cannot answer this question: What did you do to save and protect American lives? On Nov. 6, we need to fire him and hire a new commander in chief who is up to the most important task of the president of the United States.

Edited November 1, 2012 by Bad_Daddy

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/anti-obama-benghazi-meme-gets-censored-for-violating-facebooks-statement-of-rights-and-responsibilities/

ANTI-OBAMA BENGHAZI MEME GETS CENSORED FOR ‘VIOLATING FACEBOOK’S STATEMENT OF RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES’

Posted on October 30, 2012 at 8:52pm by Jason Howerton

Facebook reportedly took down an image, or a meme, posted by the Special Operations Speaks PAC (SOS) that was critical of President Barack Obama’s handling of the terrorist attack on the U.S. compound in Benghazi. You may have actually seen it before it was taken down — it had earned roughly 24,000 “likes.”

The meme, which can be seen below, shows both Obama and deceased al-Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden with the following message: “Obama called the SEALs and THEY got bin Laden. When the SEALs called Obama, THEY GOT DENIED.”

It was first taken down and the account was issued a warning. The account was later suspended for 24 hours for defying the warning and re-posting the image — with the warning above it.

The message is based on reports that indicate CIA operatives in Benghazi were told to “stand down” rather than help after Americans on the ground in Libya attempted to call out for help. Reports also suggest that the White House situation room had access to a live feed of the chaos at the U.S. compound as well as real-time email updates from within State Department.

Breitbart.com’s Awr Hawkins reportedly spoke with Larry Ward, president of Political Media, Inc., the company responsible for the SOS Facebook account.

“We created and posted this meme on Saturday after news broke that Obama had known and denied SEALs the backup they requested,” Ward told Breitbart.com.

He continued: “Once the meme was up it garnered 30,000 shares, approx. 24,000 likes, and was read by hundreds of thousands of people — all within 24 hrs. On Sunday, I went into the SOS Facebook page to post something else and found a warning from Facebook that we had violated Facebook’s Statement of Rights and Responsibilities with our meme. So I copied the warning, put it on the meme as as caption, and re-posted the meme to the Facebook page.”

The re-posted meme was removed within 8 hours before Facebook suspended the SOS PAC’s account for 24 hours.

Is this a violation of free speech or did SOS violate Facebook policy?