Benghazi New troubling evidence

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

That dead fish must be a Chicago thing.

A Teary Emanuel Gets Dead Fish At White House Send-off

Slain SEAL's Dad Blasts Obama: 'Like Shaking Hands With Dead Fish'

Edited October 27, 2012 by The Patriot

[lostinblue 1,989]

Impeach the kenyan NOW

[spookyturtle 9,465]

So, how exactly DO you ambush an AC-130U Specter?

Very carefully.

[Pooky 3,782]

Very carefully.

Indeed.

[Danno 1,228]

It's pretty obvious that Obummer supporters care more about the rights of illegals than they do American lives overseas. How pathetic.

SaDYL enough, there is a good measure of truth in that.

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

SaDYL enough, there is a good measure of truth in that.

If I had my druthers there would be around 75 million people deported from this country and then it would be time for the illegals to deported right afterwards. Make me dictator for a decade or two and this country would be like Mayberry RFD by the time I was finished.

[Ban Hammer 13,334]

So, how exactly DO you ambush an AC-130U Specter?

with a modern supersonic fighter.

for the average ground pounder, it's time to say your hail mary's.

[Pooky 3,782]

with a modern supersonic fighter.

for the average ground pounder, it's time to say your hail mary's.

For the boots on the ground, even one of the 20,000 missing MANPADS wouldn't do any good, as the gunship's orbit would be out of their effective range. Not to mention the probable incoming stream of fire, which would generally tend to mess with their ability to act without terminal consequences.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

For the boots on the ground, even one of the 20,000 missing MANPADS wouldn't do any good, as the gunship's orbit would be out of their effective range. Not to mention the probable incoming stream of fire, which would generally tend to mess with their ability to act without terminal consequences.

The fact remains that for over 7 hours people on the ground were dying and screaming for help. Help was ready available but "someone" made the decision to not allow it to happen. I want to know who and why. If there is no cover up then why is no one responding. ?

Spooky could have been overhead in a very short period of time, if the request had been granted, with fighter cover. I am not saying Obama s the person who said no. I am reasonable, I would just like answers. Why is it so wrong to ask for the truth to come out ??

I have to add that I think without a shadow of a doubt if this had happened on Bush's watch on the eve of an election, it would be 24 hour topic on CNN and you moonbat libs would be screaming for impeachment .

Like I said all I want is the truth.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

And now this. The CIA is flatly denying they refused requests for help. This had to come from the highest levels. Someone is lying and I am starting to think ti is the president.

This is daming in my opnion. Why would the President not answer-President Barack Obama said repeatedly Friday that his administration would "find out what happened" and punish those responsible, but he twice ducked questions about whether U.S. officials denied requests for help.

My link

ASHINGTON (AP) -- Obama administration officials defended their response to the September attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, amid new claims that the White House failed to send help quickly enough as militants overran the mission. The U.S. ambassador and three other Americans died in the hourslong battle.

Fox News reported that security officers working for the CIA in Benghazi heard the attack on the consulate but were twice told to wait before rushing to the compound. Fox also reported that U.S. officials refused when the security team asked for U.S. warplanes to bomb their attackers, which would have meant violating Libyan airspace.

In response to the report, CIA spokeswoman Jennifer Youngblood said the CIA "reacted quickly to aid our colleagues during that terrible evening in Benghazi."

She added: "Moreover, no one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need; claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate."

President Barack Obama said repeatedly Friday that his administration would "find out what happened" and punish those responsible, but he twice ducked questions about whether U.S. officials denied requests for help.

"We're going to gather all the facts, find out exactly what happened, and make sure that it doesn't happen again, but we're also going to make sure we bring to justice those who carried out these attacks," Obama said in an interview with Denver television station KUSA.

In the run-up to the presidential election, Republicans have accused the Obama administration of distorting the account of the attack on Sept. 11 that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans. Officials first blamed the attack on a mob set into motion by an anti-Islamic film, saying the mob had been infiltrated and overtaken by extremists. Officials later revised their account, describing the attack as a military-style operation that took place without a demonstration beforehand.

The new claims come as Republican senators demanded that the Obama administration make public the surveillance video taken during and just after the attacks.

Sens. John McCain of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire wrote to the defense secretary, CIA director and attorney general demanding that the video from Sept. 11 and 12 be declassified. Pentagon and CIA officials declined to comment on the senators' request. Justice Department officials did not respond to requests for comment.

U.S. intelligence officials this week turned over intelligence reports to Congress showing what officials at the CIA and other agencies knew and when. U.S. officials who have reviewed the material say it shows confusion during and in the days following the attack. Members of Congress have complained that the White House and the intelligence community stuck to the analysis that an angry mob started the attack long after it had become more clear that it was an organized militant operation.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Yes. We will explore this matter, and find out all the facts, no matter where they lead -- after the election. That gives Obama about three months to get his story straight, before the hearings begin sometime in January, whether he is reelected, or not. Of course Joe is quietly sanitizing his records, as is Hillary, just in case this blows up in Obama's face.

Edited October 27, 2012 by The Patriot

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Did somebody say, "Watergate on Steroids?"

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Did somebody say, "Watergate on Steroids?"

I don't understand the Media blackout out on this. This is as big or bigger than Watergate.

[Pooky 3,782]

I don't understand the Media blackout out on this. This is as big or bigger than Watergate.

They're too busy trying to create a distraction with Governor Romney's testimony in a friend's divorce case from 1991.