Ohio voter fraud billboards to come down, sponsor stays unnamed

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

http://news.yahoo.com/ohio-voter-fraud-billboards-come-down-sponsor-stays-225217520--sector.html

By Kim Palmer | Reuters – 15 hrs ago

CLEVELAND (Reuters) - More than 140 billboards in Ohio and Wisconsin warning of the criminal consequences of voter fraud will be taken down starting on Monday after the sponsor chose to remove them rather than reveal its identity, the billboard owner said.

The billboards, which show a large judge's gavel and read "Voter Fraud is a felony - up to 3 ½ years and a $10,000 fine," went up primarily in low-income minority neighborhoods in early October, just weeks before the November 6 elections, and were immediately criticized by voter rights groups as an attempt to intimidate minority voters.

The sponsor was not identified on the billboards owned by Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings Inc. The company said this was a violation of its policy against anonymous political ads.

After discussions, the sponsor, whom Clear Channel Outdoor has called a "private family foundation" but declined to name, "thought the best solution was to take the boards down, so we are in the process of removing them," the company said in a statement.

Crews on Monday will begin taking down 30 billboards in Cleveland, 30 in Columbus and 85 in Milwaukee, Jim Cullinan, vice president of corporate communications for Clear Channel Outdoor, told Reuters.

Cleveland City Councilwoman Phyllis Cleveland, one of the most vocal critics of the billboards, told Reuters on Sunday: "Needless to say I'm happy they will be taken down but I want to know who was behind this in the first place."

In response to the outcry, Clear Channel Outdoor donated 10 billboards around the Cleveland area that read "Voting Is a Right. Not a Crime!"

Edited October 22, 2012 by Bad_Daddy

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

[Obama 2012 1,714]

So if someone votes illegally after seeing the "Voting is a Right. Not a crime" sign, will clear channel be held liable?

If people are too stupid to not understand that they have a right to vote if they are a LEGAL US Citizen, then they probably shouldn't be voting in the first place.

Funny part being is the reason why most of the billboards were 'available' in the first place in the not-so-nice areas of town, comes from the fact that they weren't purchased to be used in the first place because they were pointless. I guarantee you the billboards couldn't be put up in the more afluent areas of town because they were already leased/under contract. Businesses lease billboard space to advertise where they think it will benefit their business. If the area won't impact sales, then they are going to pay the $300-$800/month to lease the space.

[Karee 4,191]

So if someone votes illegally after seeing the "Voting is a Right. Not a crime" sign, will clear channel be held liable?

If people are too stupid to not understand that they have a right to vote if they are a LEGAL US Citizen, then they probably shouldn't be voting in the first place.

Funny part being is the reason why most of the billboards were 'available' in the first place in the not-so-nice areas of town, comes from the fact that they weren't purchased to be used in the first place because they were pointless. I guarantee you the billboards couldn't be put up in the more afluent areas of town because they were already leased/under contract. Businesses lease billboard space to advertise where they think it will benefit their business. If the area won't impact sales, then they are going to pay the $300-$800/month to lease the space.

Also no point in wasting money on a presidential campaign ad in that neighborhood.

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

Also no point in wasting money on a presidential campaign ad in that neighborhood.