Post-Debate Thoughts - Winners? Losers?

[Obama 2012 1,714]

Obama definitely came out stronger in this debate and was more lively than before. Tried making some points and took a few jabs at Mitt while lying his ####### off at the same time.

Obama gets a big +1 for taking responsibility for Benghazi saying the buck actually stops with him.

Obama gets negative points for lying about oil production and federal permits, and for begging the moderator to interfere to where he actually wouldn't have to 'debate' (several times during the night).

Romney did about the same as last debate. Had a few talking points, attacked Obama great on energy, and gave great points on immigration and tax policy.

He failed on women's issues by trying to make women about to be different than men while trying to talk about equal rights at the same time.

Mitt really bothered me on his China argument "polices have made it harder for jobs here. We need to make it easier for jobs here. Not going to say how though. bla bla bla."

Of course neither one of these candidates is all that great and the SHEEP will vote for one of the two, but meh.

BOTH candidates FAIL miserably for not mentioning the constitution ONCE!

Edited October 17, 2012 by Obama 2012

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

Obama definitely came out stronger in this debate and was more lively than before. Tried making some points and took a few jabs at Mitt while lying his ####### off at the same time.

Obama gets a big +1 for taking responsibility for Benghazi saying the buck actually stops with him.

Obama gets negative points for lying about oil production and federal permits, and for begging the moderator to interfere to where he actually wouldn't have to 'debate' (several times during the night).

Romney did about the same as last debate. Had a few talking points, attacked Obama great on energy, and gave great points on immigration and tax policy.

He failed on women's issues by trying to make women about to be different than men while trying to talk about equal rights at the same time.

Mitt really bothered me on his China argument "polices have made it harder for jobs here. We need to make it easier for jobs here. Not going to say how though. bla bla bla."

Of course neither one of these candidates is all that great and the SHEEP will vote for one of the two, but meh.

####### were you watching? HOPE?

[codygrace 14]

Oooh.. What about the segments on immigration! There was a lot of time with that. Who do you think came out stronger on immigration positions?

[Pooky 3,833]

Oooh.. What about the segments on immigration! There was a lot of time with that. Who do you think came out stronger on immigration positions?

Romney

... but that was one of the few subjects he did well on

Edited October 17, 2012 by Pooky

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

I think America is frigged either way

[spookyturtle 9,466]

Oooh.. What about the segments on immigration! There was a lot of time with that. Who do you think came out stronger on immigration positions?

I think Romney did. I actually agree with him on this and I think it was one of the few issues where he actually let us know what he would do. Overall, I give this one to Obama. There tied now, 1-1.

[Obama 2012 1,714]

I think Romney did. I actually agree with him on this and I think it was one of the few issues where he actually let us know what he would do. Overall, I give this one to Obama. There tied now, 1-1.

See, I can't give it to Obama for a couple of reasons.

#1 - He lied his #### off (and ABC hit it hard after the debate was over) on energy policy.

#2 - He kepy whining to the moderator about being picked on.

So lack of truth and lack of character... Not exactly a win.

I'd go for a draw here if anything.

[Pooky 3,833]

The President won by more than 3 minutes.

[spookyturtle 9,466]

Romney was also incorrect with some of his facts. And the only issue that Romney actually gave any info on exactly what he would do was immigration. Other than that, just criticism of Obama and that he had the experience to set things straight with no indication of how he would do it.

[Pooky 3,833]

Romney was also incorrect with some of his facts. And the only issue that Romney actually gave any info on exactly what he would do was immigration. Other than that, just criticism of Obama and that he had the experience to set things straight with no indication of how he would do it.

The President is coming up rather short on the truth, too.

Then again, what part does the truth play in these things?

[Penny Lane 8,159]

Once again Romney was begged for specifics and gave none.

I thought Obama did better but not by too much.

[spookyturtle 9,466]

The President is coming up rather short on the truth, too.

Then again, what part does the truth play in these things?

They both use the same set of supposed facts and come up with two totally different viewpoints. Manipulate them to support your views. That's the beauty of politics.

Once again Romney was begged for specifics and gave none.

I thought Obama did better but not by too much.

IMHO, Romney only gave specifics on illegal immigration.

[lostinblue 1,989]

I have the impression that if the kenyan wins in a month he will declare the NRA a terrorist organization.

[웃 910]

[Danno 1,228]

I predicted a draw and I think it was however, Romney did make a very pointed message of

- The key thingsObama promised he didn't deliver

-I can get it done.

Obama made a decent defense but

I think the polls are going to move more in Romney's favor.