"When it comes to adultery, it's 90% the womans fault"

[Veiled Princess 1]

One of these ladies appears more sexually available to me than the other. You get two guesses.

Leave it to you to bring porn with you but good point anyway.

[Peikko 1,575]

Hookers excepted.

I am sure this is tongue in cheek, but there is no excuse for perpetuating the myth that men are incapable of controlling their sexual urges.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Hookers excepted.

She's a "stewardess"

[Veiled Princess 1]

Hookers excepted.

I am sure this is tongue in cheek, but there is no excuse for perpetuating the myth that men are incapable of controlling their sexual urges.

I'm not saying they can't or shouldn't but that doesn't mean we have to throw it at them or dangle it in front of them either.

She's a "stewardess"

I think that's flight attendant to be PC

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

She's a "stewardess"

I think that's flight attendant to be PC

VP,

PC? You're one to talk

[Peikko 1,575]

Good point? What airlines do you fly on?

So, you are saying, for example, that I should cease accompanying my husband to the beach because he is incabable of resisting the sirens in bathing suits?

I can't wait to tell him, I am sure he'll be very pleased.

[Alex+R 0]

Good point? What airlines do you fly on?

So, you are saying, for example, that I should cease accompanying my husband to the beach because he is incabable of resisting the sirens in bathing suits?

I can't wait to tell him, I am sure he'll be very pleased.

Hee hee, I am trying to imagine what VP wears to the beach...

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Hee hee, I am trying to imagine what VP wears to the beach...

[Saddle Bronc 124]

Hee hee, I am trying to imagine what VP wears to the beach...

That's easy: a rose-coloured hijab!

[Alex+R 0]

[Peikko 1,575]

Either there is a causality, and what I wear is relevant, or there isn't, and what I wear is not. How is a woman wearing, say a bikini on the beach, throwing herself at a man? If a man is capable of restraint, then he is capable of restraint and no matter what a women chooses to wear, he will not act desprespectully towards her.

Edited October 28, 2006 by Purple_Hibiscus

[Veiled Princess 1]

Either there is a causality, and what I wear is relevant, or there isn't, and what I wear is not.

What kind of environment do you work in? What do you wear there on a normal day?

[Peikko 1,575]

In an office one is expected to wear smart clothes, not in the interests of sexual restraint, but because society has equated being smartly dressed with concepts such as efficiency, reliablity and having a professional work ethic.

Other work environments may have other dictats but they are related to the type of work being conducted, not whether men can work with females in scanty attire or otherwise.

Edited October 28, 2006 by Purple_Hibiscus

[sophyie 0]

Even though I think that clothing can be a signal for certain things ("leave me alone", "here I am"...) I think the behaviour is the even stronger signal.

If someone is willing to commit adultery there will be signals that go WAY beyond the clothes this person is wearing. And those signals come from both. So IMO the "responsability" is on both sides equally.

[Caladan 19]

I figure if men are really like the crazed sex addicts portrayed in the article, I ain't going to stop at covering my hair with a scarf. If they're no more like dogs, and are going to fall on any woman at any time, lock 'em up. Allow them out only on leashes while accompanied by their mothers and four female relatives. Give them shots to reduce their sex drive. Maybe castrate them like we do tomcats.

Of course, that's a crazy and deeply sad view of men. So, poor things, have to have a bit of self-control.