Martin's DNA not found on Zimmerman's gun.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Forensics tests in George Zimmerman’s murder trial show that none of the victim’s DNA was found on the gun used to kill him, according to evidence released Wednesday by the Duval County State Attorney.

Tests show there was DNA from at least three different people on the holster Zimmerman used to carry his weapon. One of those was Zimmerman’s, but the other two couldn’t be determined.

Although more than one person’s DNA was on the Kel Tec 9 mm Zimmerman used to shoot Trayvon, the tests proved positive only for Zimmerman. Trayvon Martin’s DNA was definitely not on the gun’s grip, but the tests were inconclusive for the holster.

Trayvon’s blood was found on the jacket Zimmerman wore. And Zimmerman’s DNA was found on the bottom part of the Nike sweatshirt Trayvon wore under his hoodie. Zimmerman’s DNA was not found under Trayvon’s fingernails.

http://m.mcclatchydc.com/dc/db_97945/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=YeRWF0LG

Edited September 20, 2012 by Commie Appeaser

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Forensics tests in George Zimmerman's murder trial show that none of the victim's DNA was found on the gun used to kill him, according to evidence released Wednesday by the Duval County State Attorney.

Tests show there was DNA from at least three different people on the holster Zimmerman used to carry his weapon. One of those was Zimmerman's, but the other two couldn't be determined.

Although more than one person's DNA was on the Kel Tec 9 mm Zimmerman used to shoot Trayvon, the tests proved positive only for Zimmerman. Trayvon Martin's DNA was definitely not on the gun's grip, but the tests were inconclusive for the holster.

Trayvon's blood was found on the jacket Zimmerman wore. And Zimmerman's DNA was found on the bottom part of the Nike sweatshirt Trayvon wore under his hoodie. Zimmerman's DNA was not found under Trayvon's fingernails.

http://m.mcclatchydc...ntguid=YeRWF0LG

and this proves what ?

[one...two...tree 2,762]

and this proves what ?

It doesn't prove anything, but it helps shed light on what might have happened and not happened during the events leading up to GZ shooting and killing TM.

[Dakine10 5,452]

and this proves what ?

Proves nothing, but adds to the mounting evidence that Martin is the victim, Zimmerman comitted murder, and Zimmerman lied from the start.

I assume you already saw the previous DNA evidence that suggests Martin was not beating Zimmerman, contrary to what Zimmerman stated.

[IR5FORMUMSIE 850]

and this proves what ?

Martin didn't handle the gun. One can easily draw their own conclusion from that.