Jump to content

13 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Nice try but not in the same league. You get an A for effort, though.

Lets see. First the post is BS as Romney never said he couldn't imagine saying no to Netanyah. Somehow, I am sure inadavertantly, the words "to meeting" were left off.

Second to equate this with Obama basically saying he would bend over, (flexibility?), for Putin on the issue of our missile defense is just plain preposterous.

Edited by DaveE
Filed: Timeline
Posted
Lets see. First the post is BS as Romney never said he couldn't imagine saying no to Netanyah. Somehow, I am sure inadavertantly, the words "to meeting" were left off.

Romney is a push-over. He hasn't taken a stance on any issue whatsoever. Ever. He won't take a stance on Israel either. If Romney is President, we will be at war with Iran. Just because Netanyahu wants to. Mitt ain't gonna stand up to him. Ever. He has no backbone. He has no courage. He has no conviction. And Netanyahu will exploit that.

Posted

Romney is a push-over. He hasn't taken a stance on any issue whatsoever. Ever. He won't take a stance on Israel either. If Romney is President, we will be at war with Iran. Just because Netanyahu wants to. Mitt ain't gonna stand up to him. Ever. He has no backbone. He has no courage. He has no conviction. And Netanyahu will exploit that.

You can call Romney whatever you want. The voters will decide in November whom they believe.

Did Romney say he wouldn't say no to Netanyahu as you posted, or did he say he wouldn't say no to "a meeting" with Netanyahu. Were you telling the truth or not?

PS - whispering to the Russian President that he should pass along to Putin, "that if he is reelected he will have "more flexibility" on missile defense shows great backbone. This is especially true if he thinks no one is listening.

Filed: Timeline
Posted

You can call Romney whatever you want.

I call him what he is. A man without principle, backbone or courage. What stance has Romney ever taken that he didn't change because he felt that it would be politically expedient to do so? Give me a few. For all I know, Mitt Romney has taken every possible stance on every political issue out there. He is the very definition of an empty suit. And you're right, voters will remember that in November and send him back into irrelevance.

Filed: Other Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted

I call him what he is. A man without principle, backbone or courage. What stance has Romney ever taken that he didn't change because he felt that it would be politically expedient to do so? Give me a few. For all I know, Mitt Romney has taken every possible stance on every political issue out there. He is the very definition of an empty suit. And you're right, voters will remember that in November and send him back into irrelevance.

I have to admit, ever since I heard Romney was published under the pseudonym "Ben Dover", I was concerned about something like this happening.

QCjgyJZ.jpg

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted

I call him what he is. A man without principle, backbone or courage. What stance has Romney ever taken that he didn't change because he felt that it would be politically expedient to do so? Give me a few. For all I know, Mitt Romney has taken every possible stance on every political issue out there. He is the very definition of an empty suit. And you're right, voters will remember that in November and send him back into irrelevance.

The more people get to know Romney, the lower his poll numbers will go! A black incumbent with unemployment above 8% will beat him! :rofl:

Filed: Timeline
Posted
The more people get to know Romney, the lower his poll numbers will go! A black incumbent with unemployment above 8% will beat him! :rofl:

That's right. This is what conservatives call a "gimme election" - an election that is impossible to lose. And yet, Mitt is struggling to gain the upper hand. He is so weak, it's pathetic. Ann Coulter was right for once. They didn't run Christie, Mitt is the nominee and the Republicans will lose. That's good news for America, though.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
:rofl: The entire process is ridiculous. If there are enough people, per the electoral college bs...., that vote Romney in, we are putting on the brakes and throwing it in reverse, hammer down mind you.
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...