Jump to content

19 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline
Posted

She is no more out of status than any K1 entrant who files outside of the 90 day window.

Actually I think there is a difference. A K1 entry has a provision for them in the I-485. Point 10 sub point F2 on the I-485 specifically makes a provision for K1's who married within 90 days regarding being "in-status".

Posted (edited)

Actually I think there is a difference. A K1 entry has a provision for them in the I-485. Point 10 sub point F2 on the I-485 specifically makes a provision for K1's who married within 90 days regarding being "in-status".

Actually there is no difference at all.

A K1 visa admits the entrant for 90 days. Marriage to the petitioner has nothing to do with status expiry. If the alien marries on day 2, they are legally present until day 90. If they never marry at all, they are legally present until day 90.

At the end of the 90 days, the alien falls out of status. Period.

I've gone and looked at what you refer to, Kaoticor, and I see you are looking at the instrucitons for the form. I would idly note that within the same Section 10 you bring forward, the category of alien listed in F1 is "immediate relative", ie a spouse who needs to file I130. All this section of the instructions does is explain who can file the form. Clearly, either a spouse or a K1 entrant spouse can file.

Anyone who files outside the date of their I94 is out of status. Anyone. K1, B1, J, H, - makes no difference the visa type. Once the I485 has been accepted by the Service, the alien enters a period of authorized stay until the case is adjudicated. Authorized stay isn't a legal status. It's a privilege granted by the Service which protects the alien from removal until the Service can get around to that alien's paperwork.

Edited by Rebecca Jo

Our journey together on this earth has come to an end.

I will see you one day again, my love.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

That's why they are filing the I-130 now with the I-485. It's essentially a new process and not an adjustment from a K-1 visa. If the beneficiary was trying to adjust status based on marriage to someone other than the K-1 petitioner it would not work. Hopefully because it is the original petitioner it will be fine.

Good luck to the OP.

:thumbs::thumbs:

Sent NOA1 April 30th 2011

received May 2nd 2011

NOA1 Notice Date:May 4th 2011

NOA 2 txt/ email on july 18th 2011

NOA 2 received in Mail July 20th dated July 18th 2011

NOA2 in "74" days!

NO RFE

Personal issue in the Philippines

Medical Exam: March 22nd 2012

Medical Cleared on March 23rd 2012

Interview Date:April 16th, 2012......PASSED

Arrival Los Angeles California: July 7th 2012.

Marriage September 7th 2012 at San Bernardino County Hall of Records

Preparing for AOS

"I Wholly disapprove of what you say, But I will defend to the death, Your RIGHT to say it"

" _ Volitaire- "

Filed: Timeline
Posted

Actually there is no difference at all.

A K1 visa admits the entrant for 90 days. Marriage to the petitioner has nothing to do with status expiry. If the alien marries on day 2, they are legally present until day 90. If they never marry at all, they are legally present until day 90.

At the end of the 90 days, the alien falls out of status. Period.

I've gone and looked at what you refer to, Kaoticor, and I see you are looking at the instrucitons for the form. I would idly note that within the same Section 10 you bring forward, the category of alien listed in F1 is "immediate relative", ie a spouse who needs to file I130. All this section of the instructions does is explain who can file the form. Clearly, either a spouse or a K1 entrant spouse can file.

Anyone who files outside the date of their I94 is out of status. Anyone. K1, B1, J, H, - makes no difference the visa type. Once the I485 has been accepted by the Service, the alien enters a period of authorized stay until the case is adjudicated. Authorized stay isn't a legal status. It's a privilege granted by the Service which protects the alien from removal until the Service can get around to that alien's paperwork.

Good point on the F1. I'm going to look around and see if I can find the law on that for more specifics, but it would seem you are right according to that wording.

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
“;}
×
×
  • Create New...