What did you think of Clinton's Speech

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Yet the allegations he made during his speech was 100% correct when fact-checked.

Not really. For instance, Reagan and Coolidge did what Clinton claimed no other President could do.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

Yet the allegations he made during his speech was 100% correct when fact-checked.

They're just going to tell you that the fact checkers were also paid by "Barry" ..

[JohnR! 5,495]

Not really. For instance, Reagan and Coolidge did what Clinton claimed no other President could do.

Yes, they were. They were fact checked and proven correct.

They're just going to tell you that the fact checkers were also paid by "Barry" ..

They can say that, it is their right to enjoy their bliss. It won't change the facts though.

[aaydrian 479]

They're just going to tell you that the fact checkers were also paid by "Barry" ..

Republicans don't care about fact checkers because they take the fun outta everything. Was a very entertaining speech. Didn't watch it live but it got buzz so I YouTubed.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Yes, they were. They were fact checked and proven correct.

Trolling?

http://factcheck.org/2012/09/our-clinton-nightmare/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/fact-checking-bill-clintons-speech-and-other-democrats-at-the-convention-in-charlotte/2012/09/06/55b9df68-f7e1-11e1-8b93-c4f4ab1c8d13_blog.html

[JohnR! 5,495]

<span class="Apple-style-span">

1346979195[/url]' post='5666931']

Trolling?

Thanks, but no thanks. You're faring rather well on your own. Thanks for posting the link to fact check. QED.

1346979193[/url]' post='5666930']

Republicans don't care about fact checkers because they take the fun outta everything. Was a very entertaining speech. Didn't watch it live but it got buzz so I YouTubed.

It was a powerful speech without the underhanded jabs we saw in Tampa.

1346979496[/url]' post='5666938'] It was a powerful speech without the underhanded jabs we saw in Tampa.

</span>

Edited September 7, 2012 by Gegel

[aaydrian 479]

It was a powerful speech without the underhanded jabs we saw in Tampa.

You watched the RNC? You son have too much time on your hands. If baby George was spewing his normal Bushism, maybe.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

You watched the RNC? You son have too much time on your hands. If baby George was spewing his normal Bushism, maybe.

No, no, no. Republicans don't put their former Presidents on stage. They rather people don't remember them. And the one that Republicans say they want to be remembered, is the one that they would certainly not bother considering to nominate today. That's right. The Gipper would be primaried by the tea baggers. And the Republican base would send him back to California rather than put him on a ticket. Any ticket.

[Dakine10 5,452]

It was long, but it had substance and is being highly praised by BOTH sides.

Don't you mean all 3 sides? The libertarian party has 282 members.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

Don't you mean all 3 sides? The libertarian party has 282 members.

I haven't heard what they had to say about it.

[JohnR! 5,495]

Don't you mean all 3 sides? The libertarian party has 282 members.

We don't count...