Automatic 2 year wait

[elmcitymaven 9,712]

I thought "peririonera" was just an accidental keyboard mangling of "petitioners." All this talk of piranhas is most perplexing.

[Ihavequestions 419]

Who wants popcorn?

[GGG1975 9]

I thought "peririonera" was just an accidental keyboard mangling of "petitioners." All this talk of piranhas is most perplexing.

Yes, the term was "perplexing" to me as well. And the person calling me "emotional." If this is suppose to be a supportive site I would hate to see the one that isn't. You can say, "Hi' and someone will criticize you for being too nice. I did not bring up the word "piranha" the responder to my posting did and I responding by using their words because of them being so cruel.

[Ihavequestions 419]

Yes, the term was "perplexing" to me as well. And the person calling me "emotional." If this is suppose to be a supportive site I would hate to see the one that isn't. You can say, "Hi' and someone will criticize you for being too nice. I did not bring up the word "piranha" the responder to my posting did and I responding by using their words because of them being so cruel.

There was nothing cruel about her response to you. Actually, it was factual and informative. Evidently, facts and information aren't relevant because you appear to be quite argumentative. Nobody - I repeat nobody - is going to confirm the absolutely incorrect and erroneous bits you've heard elsewhere.

[elmcitymaven 9,712]

Yes, the term was "perplexing" to me as well. And the person calling me "emotional." If this is suppose to be a supportive site I would hate to see the one that isn't. You can say, "Hi' and someone will criticize you for being too nice. I did not bring up the word "piranha" the responder to my posting did and I responding by using their words because of them being so cruel.

I re-read this thread twice and the first mention of carnivorous fish comes here:

there are fraudulent piranhas everywhere

The other poster didn't refer to "fraudulent piranhas" but "fraudulent petitioners," if I deduce correctly her intent in that typo.

Also, it's against the TOS to say something like this:

If I'm emotional then you are stupid in your reply...better yet stay off my forum.

Just a heads up.

[GGG1975 9]

I re-read this thread twice and the first mention of carnivorous fish comes here:

The other poster didn't refer to "fraudulent piranhas" but "fraudulent petitioners," if I deduce correctly her intent in that typo.

Also, it's against the TOS to say something like this:

Just a heads up.

If you think that is factual then there's nothing else I can say to you. Fraud is everywhere not just in Morocco and not just because someone is denied by immigration. There are plenty of people denied the first time and their case is not fraudulent and they are not piranaas. "Factual" right....ok :no:

[elmcitymaven 9,712]

If you think that is factual then there's nothing else I can say to you. Fraud is everywhere not just in Morocco and not just because someone is denied by immigration. There are plenty of people denied the first time and their case is not fraudulent and they are not piranaas. "Factual" right....ok :no:

I still don't understand why we're referencing piranhas here and not petitioners.

[msheesha 548]

FYI- that was supposed to say "fraudulent people" & it was my iPhone auto correct that put that word in.

Nobody was talking about other consulates & I have no first hand experience about what specifically happens in other countries re: immigration fraud. Ergo there was no need for me to mention any place other than Morocco. But if calling me ignorant and stupid you feel better, have at it! Btw this is a public forum not belonging to any one person. Calling it your own forum is humorous!

[GGG1975 9]

FYI- that was supposed to say "fraudulent people" & it was my iPhone auto correct that put that word in.

Nobody was talking about other consulates & I have no first hand experience about what specifically happens in other countries re: immigration fraud. Ergo there was no need for me to mention any place other than Morocco. But if calling me ignorant and stupid you feel better, have at it! Btw this is a public forum not belonging to any one person. Calling it your own forum is humorous!

It made me feel much better just like it made you feel good to call me "emotional". If you are going to dish it you better be able to take it. If not move along and learn how to spell before you reply.

[msheesha 548]

I thought "peririonera" was just an accidental keyboard mangling of "petitioners." All this talk of piranhas is most perplexing.

Yup it was. Mangling of people.

Edited August 19, 2012 by msheesha

[Boiler 45,535]

There have been many many informative posts about the issues this Consulate need to deal with.

Probably best to and read them, they come from those who have actually been there and seen it.

[GGG1975 9]

There have been many many informative posts about the issues this Consulate need to deal with.

Probably best to and read them, they come from those who have actually been there and seen it.

Oh wow, constructive advice without personal insult. Boiler, thank you.

[sandinista! 1,816]

Boy did I call this one wrong.

I agree. Despite being given some incorrect information, the OP sounds well informed about the tough realities of this consulate and has a realistic outlook.

Genine it sounds like you have you done some very smart things with gathering lots of proof of family support, etc, and with how you prepared your application. I wish you lots of luck, and as easy a time as possible with Casablanca!

[GGG1975 9]

What does "OP" mean? Thank you for your well wishes.

So did I about you. If you dish it you better be able to take it.

[himher 634]

LOL...........we met in person for the first time (2) days before we got married, never submitted a single scrap of evidence other than the basic information required with the I130/I129F (that was before K3's were obsolete and just about the time that "Dan the trucker" started his K3 ravings) and there was no delay in processing our case.

I think your case will stand or fall on its merits. You are in a particularly difficult consulate HOWEVER USCIS processes petitions without prejudice and normally, in your case, your difficulty will be at the interview/visa application step.

Thank you all for the updates. Yes, she worked for USCIS for many years. She recently spoke to a friend that is still there and they discussed the whole delay process. I apologize for stating "visa approval" I met approval of the applications in the USCIS stage, before being sent to NVC. She told me no amount of evidence, visit, communication, etc offsets the fact that we married within a 6 month period.

I hope you all are correct and they process our case within the normal processing times. I'll definitely keep this topic open and will keep you guys updated. At this point we are praying and hoping for a miracle.

I hope all is well in each of your cases.

Thank you so much for responding.