I-129F Denied :(

[TnJ 131]

And the degree in the Philippines can't be used here. Nursing, they can take the bar exam twice including the one in the US, but all other degrees are useless here.

*NCLEX

Bar is law. I disagree with the idea that a degree is absolutely useless regardless of where it is obtained. Employers determine who and who is not qualified for a job.

Edited August 3, 2012 by ToddnJessa

[TnJ 131]

What do you mean by "used" here? Most of the people I work with did not get their degrees in the US. Also, the school she is attending is recognized here in the US, it even has campuses in the US, and is considered one of the best in Phil for IT/Tech. I doubt she will graduate from the school she is at now, provided everything goes OK with the visa, but even if she did, I think a degree from a good school with an appropriate curriculum will work fine at getting an entry level job in IT here in the US. While some degrees might not go too far here if acquired in Phil, I don't think she would have any problem.

I don't see why she would have any more of problem with IT than anyone else. The IT field usually values experience more than a particular degree, plus as you say, the school is recognized here.

[Eric-Pris 1,607]

That's OK, like I said I feel foolish now. The thing is, I downloaded the I-129F instructions, and also the Fiance help pdf. None of them say I need to submit evidence of anything with the I-129F form.

Actually, the 129F instructions tell you exactly what you need to send, besides the form. Read them again.

[M J 11]

I don't see why she would have any more of problem with IT than anyone else. The IT field usually values experience more than a particular degree, plus as you say, the school is recognized here.

Right, I don't think she will have any problem. Experience is more important, like you mentioned, but most employers also look for a degree, especially for an entry level job. I think a degree from any good school with an appropriate curriculum, and showing the dedication to obtain that degree is what matters.

[M J 11]

Well I received the denial letter today. No surprise... basically it says I did not provide the proof needed. The attachment lists a few paragraphs and parts that say what is required to prove a relationship that I did not fulfill. It says I can appeal for $630, and it also included a I-290B form. Now my question is, should I appeal and provide all the info, or just refile with all the info??? What path would be quicker?

[dwheels76 5,468]

Well I received the denial letter today. No surprise... basically it says I did not provide the proof needed. The attachment lists a few paragraphs and parts that say what is required to prove a relationship that I did not fulfill. It says I can appeal for $630, and it also included a I-290B form. Now my question is, should I appeal and provide all the info, or just refile with all the info??? What path would be quicker?

Appeal what? And why would u pay twice the price when u can just refile and be on ur way. IMHO

[cdneh 3,112]

I would just refile. Glad at least you know the reason, and have found VJ. It will go better this time

[M J 11]

Appeal what? And why would u pay twice the price when u can just refile and be on ur way. IMHO

That is what I was thinking, but if an appeal would go quicker it might be worth it to me to just appeal. Also, I asked this before, but I did not see any specific answer... would there be any issue if I refile? Would I already be in the system and come up when they processed the new I-129F?

[pushbrk 13,011]

That is what I was thinking, but if an appeal would go quicker it might be worth it to me to just appeal. Also, I asked this before, but I did not see any specific answer... would there be any issue if I refile? Would I already be in the system and come up when they processed the new I-129F?

There is nothing to appeal. They were correct to deny the petition. Of course they'll know about the first petition when you file again. No problem. Just do it right the next time and the petition will be adjudicated again, independently from the first submission.

[M J 11]

There is nothing to appeal. They were correct to deny the petition. Of course they'll know about the first petition when you file again. No problem. Just do it right the next time and the petition will be adjudicated again, independently from the first submission.

Yes, I know there is technically nothing to appeal, but they give me that option. I was denied, based on lack of evidence/proof, so I can appeal that denial by providing proof. If it goes quicker appealing, then I will, if not then I will just start over with a new file.

[QueenE 174]

Yes, I know there is technically nothing to appeal, but they give me that option. I was denied, based on lack of evidence/proof, so I can appeal that denial by providing proof. If it goes quicker appealing, then I will, if not then I will just start over with a new file.

I understanding what your saying.. instead of waiting another 5 + months would it be faster to just pay double and have it go quicker. Good question hopefully someone has the answer

[Mogambi 96]

If the appeal would somehow be moved to the head of the queue so to speak, it might be worth considering. However, the general thinking was that appeals are much harder to be successful in. So I don't know if I would bother. At least it wasn't denied because they didn't BELIEVE your evidence, just because you didn't GIVE any! That might actually work in your favor.

But I have no idea if an appeal would be any faster.

I suppose if you refile, I would personally at least in my cover letter address the fact that this is your second application, that the first was denied because you screwed up and didn't supply the evidence.

[pushbrk 13,011]

Yes, I know there is technically nothing to appeal, but they give me that option. I was denied, based on lack of evidence/proof, so I can appeal that denial by providing proof. If it goes quicker appealing, then I will, if not then I will just start over with a new file.

It would be a waste of time. They were correct to deny. The option is an empty one. File again properly.

[QueenE 174]

I dont think OP is disputing that they were correct in denying them.

[pushbrk 13,011]

I dont think OP is disputing that they were correct in denying them.

To file an appeal would be to do exactly that. The appeal will fail, then several months later, they'll still need to refile but won't get that time back.