Chick-Fil-A takes perception dive with fast food eaters

[rocks 494]

disney is making kids fat then. they cut the partnership. cfa had safety concerns w/ the toys...i'm going to give the evil christians some more money. see you in 1 hour.

No, they didn't. This was a cover up for the toys being withdrawn. If they toys were already withdrawn, why would they release a statement days later saying it was because of safety concerns? That is the most stupid argument I've ever heard.

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

They are? What do they say?

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/380299-chick-fil-a-takes-perception-dive-with-fast-food-eaters/page__view__findpost__p__5567918

[^_^ 5,021]

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/380299-chick-fil-a-takes-perception-dive-with-fast-food-eaters/page__view__findpost__p__5567918

noooo paste the entire wall of text again. and again.

[JohnR! 5,495]

http://www.visajourn...ost__p__5567918

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8772014

The authors investigated the role of homosexual arousal in exclusively heterosexual men who admitted negative affect toward homosexual individuals. Participants consisted of a group of homophobic men (n = 35) and a group of nonhomophobic men (n = 29); they were assigned to groups on the basis of their scores on the Index of Homophobia (W. W. Hudson & W. A. Ricketts, 1980). The men were exposed to sexually explicit erotic stimuli consisting of heterosexual, male homosexual, and lesbian videotapes, and changes in penile circumference were monitored. They also completed an Aggression Questionnaire (A. H. Buss & M. Perry, 1992). Both groups exhibited increases in penile circumference to the heterosexual and female homosexual videos. Only the homophobic men showed an increase in penile erection to male homosexual stimuli. The groups did not differ in aggression. Homophobia is apparently associated with homosexual arousal that the homophobic individual is either unaware of or denies.

[^_^ 5,021]

Only the homophobic men showed an increase in penile erection to male homosexual stimuli.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

[Teddy B 17,252]

I wasn't aware that I was coming across as anything but someone that has read the Bible. My opinions are my own Take them for what you will.

Maybe I mistook the following for arrogance?

You really need some lessons on the Christian faith if you want to try and talk about it

This is the last and only applicable covenant that Christians are required to follow. All of the nonsense in the old testament about stoning gays was overturned with the New Covenant in Christ Jesus.

No, but that really has nothing to do with it if you understand what the Bible is really saying.

Sorry man, you really have it all wrong.

Jeeze, Try and understand.

Get a grip man!

Here, try reading this and what follows. It explains where you are going wrong.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

Yum.

[rocks 494]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8772014

The authors investigated the role of homosexual arousal in exclusively heterosexual men who admitted negative affect toward homosexual individuals. Participants consisted of a group of homophobic men (n = 35) and a group of nonhomophobic men (n = 29); they were assigned to groups on the basis of their scores on the Index of Homophobia (W. W. Hudson & W. A. Ricketts, 1980). The men were exposed to sexually explicit erotic stimuli consisting of heterosexual, male homosexual, and lesbian videotapes, and changes in penile circumference were monitored. They also completed an Aggression Questionnaire (A. H. Buss & M. Perry, 1992). Both groups exhibited increases in penile circumference to the heterosexual and female homosexual videos. Only the homophobic men showed an increase in penile erection to male homosexual stimuli. The groups did not differ in aggression. Homophobia is apparently associated with homosexual arousal that the homophobic individual is either unaware of or denies.

Who would do such a study?

[Teddy B 17,252]

No, they didn't. This was a cover up for the toys being withdrawn. If they toys were already withdrawn, why would they release a statement days later saying it was because of safety concerns? That is the most stupid argument I've ever heard.

The kids shouldn't have been eating the toys, perhaps that's why they were getting fat. Was this in Mississippi?

[rocks 494]

The kids shouldn't have been eating the toys, perhaps that's why they were getting fat. Was this in Mississippi?

Since when was The Telegraph a liberal newspaper?

Don't start with your racist ####### again, it is old.

[Teddy B 17,252]

Since when was The Telegraph a liberal newspaper?

Don't start with your racist ####### again, it is old.

Who said that the Telegraph was a liberal newspaper?

More importantly, why were the kids in Mississippi eating the Muppett toys?

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

I don't understand why it bothers some people so much just because God finds Homosexuality an abomination. Isn't God entitled to his/her opinion?

Edited July 30, 2012 by Bad_Daddy

[rocks 494]

Who said that the Telegraph was a liberal newspaper?

More importantly, why were the kids in Mississippi eating the Muppett toys?

You did.

Stop the racist comments.

[JohnSmith2007 353]

Maybe I mistook the following for arrogance?

Ah, so anyone that expresses a strong and heartfelt opinion based upon his own experiences is arrogant? Got it. I guess anyone that argues a point here is also arrogant?