Jump to content
Danno

Another case of Gun Control -Backfiring.

 Share

198 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Coz the simple argument is if someone went on the high speed chase and in the process hits multiple vehicle killing and injuring innocent victims.

Would you or any of the politicians recommend banning the motor vehicle?

Own a weapon and you know how it works, lot of the people who are against the gun has never held a weapon nor fired a weapon in their life yet they jump on the band wagon of banning the guns.

:thumbs:

sigbet.jpg

"I want to take this opportunity to mention how thankful I am for an Obama re-election. The choice was clear. We cannot live in a country that treats homosexuals and women as second class citizens. Homosexuals deserve all of the rights and benefits of marriage that heterosexuals receive. Women deserve to be treated with respect and their salaries should not depend on their gender, but their quality of work. I am also thankful that the great, progressive state of California once again voted for the correct President. America is moving forward, and the direction is a positive one."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: United Kingdom
Timeline

There is actually tech that will stamp a casing with an ID of the firearm that fired the round. But its patented still.

What I meant was that people have to be linked to the purchase of the ammo, the same as they are with guns. I can see all the right wingers complaining that it is an invasion of their privacy, but I don't see any real justification against it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: India
Timeline

The thing is this is one of those scenarios where neither side really has an argument. You are right in saying that the attacker would use any method to cause casualties even if no firearms existed. Likewise, the whole notion of conceal carry protecting the people in that cinema is silly. Proponents of conceal carry that would argue so have already forgotten their primary argument for conceal carry - that a criminal is less likely to engage in crime if he believes a few ppl may be armed. In this case, the attacker mitigated that.

Both sides need to realize that the attack is out of the norm and there is very little that can be done to stop the truly dedicated mass killer with above average intellect.

You are right in case like guy from Colorado would mitigate if they know that some ppl in the crowd could be armed.

Yet there can be some resistance, unless you believe in going down without resistance that it’s a different story.

Say 4-5 ppl in the crowd had CC and couple more in theater had CC, there can be some resistance put up, possibilities are there.

This case he was very well aware no one is armed at all. The city or state laws were even weird, no one could discharge a weapon other than at firing range, for someone like Colorado guy that was a VIP ticket he knew no one would be armed and nothing was going to stop him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Afghanistan
Timeline

What I meant was that people have to be linked to the purchase of the ammo, the same as they are with guns. I can see all the right wingers complaining that it is an invasion of their privacy, but I don't see any real justification against it.

How would you link them?

You may not realize how hard that would be given people collect the casings off of ranges etc, buy powder by the pound, and pour their own lead.

Edited by Sousuke
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are right in case like guy from Colorado would mitigate if they know that some ppl in the crowd could be armed.

Yet there can be some resistance, unless you believe in going down without resistance that it’s a different story.

Say 4-5 ppl in the crowd had CC and couple more in theater had CC, there can be some resistance put up, possibilities are there.

This case he was very well aware no one is armed at all. The city or state laws were even weird, no one could discharge a weapon other than at firing range, for someone like Colorado guy that was a VIP ticket he knew no one would be armed and nothing was going to stop him.

Quite a lot of armor for someone who wasn't worried about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: United Kingdom
Timeline

How would you link them?

You may not realize how hard that would be given people collect the casings off of ranges etc, buy powder by the pound, and pour their own lead.

That when they buy the ammo they must be subject to the same rules as buying a gun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline

What I meant was that people have to be linked to the purchase of the ammo, the same as they are with guns. I can see all the right wingers complaining that it is an invasion of their privacy, but I don't see any real justification against it.

then perhaps you have not asked enough questions?

like how much will this increase cost?

and as it's for all ammo, how much will that cost be for state and federal purchases, as police use ammo and so does the military.

also - what about shotguns - is someone gonna engrave a bunch of #9 pellets?

how about ammo already purchased? are people gonna have turn that in?

Edited by charles!

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: India
Timeline

What I meant was that people have to be linked to the purchase of the ammo, the same as they are with guns. I can see all the right wingers complaining that it is an invasion of their privacy, but I don't see any real justification against it.

Proves you believe in big government... so now make another agency whose job would be to track the ammo.

Governement should put GPS on your ankle to trace you where you are going, if you are not going to get in to car and mow down ppl.

How about that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline

How would you link them?

You may not realize how hard that would be given people collect the casings off of ranges etc, buy powder by the pound, and pour their own lead.

:thumbs:

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Afghanistan
Timeline

You are right in case like guy from Colorado would mitigate if they know that some ppl in the crowd could be armed.

Yet there can be some resistance, unless you believe in going down without resistance that it’s a different story.

Say 4-5 ppl in the crowd had CC and couple more in theater had CC, there can be some resistance put up, possibilities are there.

This case he was very well aware no one is armed at all. The city or state laws were even weird, no one could discharge a weapon other than at firing range, for someone like Colorado guy that was a VIP ticket he knew no one would be armed and nothing was going to stop him.

Honestly? I think the guy assumed people would be armed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: United Kingdom
Timeline

then perhaps you have not asked enough questions?

like how much will this increase costs?

and as it's for all ammo, how much will that cost be for state and federal purchases, as police use ammo and so does the military.

also - what about shotguns - is someone gonna engrave a bunch of #9 pellets?

how about ammo already purchased? are people gonna have turn that in?

The cost would have to be absorbed by the purchaser.

It makes me think of this, can you guess who it is? :)

Everybody is talking about gun control. Got to control the guns. F***, that, I like guns. If you've got a gun, you don't need to work out! Cause, I ain't working out. I ain't jogging. No, I think we need some bullet control. I think every bullet should cost five thousand dollars. Five thousand dollars for a bullet. Know why? Cos if a bullet cost five thousand dollars, there'd be no more innocent by-standers. That'd be it. Some guy'd be shot you'd be all 'Damn, he must've done something, he's got fifty thousand dollars worth of bullets in his a**!'
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Evylin the only real armour he had was vest.

Other stuff like black legging or gas mask that is not bullet proof.

Why wear a bullet proof vest if he knew his victims wouldn't be shooting back? He gave himself up to the cops, so it's not like he planned a shootout with them, either.

That's the truly odd part. Usually these crazies either off themselves or try to take down a few cops with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: India
Timeline

Honestly? I think the guy assumed people would be armed.

Could be I don't know, this seemed to be completely disllusional.

He did not give any fight to police or anything, even in the court yesterday he did not say anything was just starring the floor and seemed was dazed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Brazil
Timeline

then perhaps you have not asked enough questions?

like how much will this increase cost?

and as it's for all ammo, how much will that cost be for state and federal purchases, as police use ammo and so does the military.

also - what about shotguns - is someone gonna engrave a bunch of #9 pellets?

how about ammo already purchased? are people gonna have turn that in?

and ... any minor modification (file or grinding) will alter the unique "signature"

next ... is each piece tracked?

what happens if you loose one piece of ammo that gets used in a non-legal manner?

what if it's simply one piece of brass left at the range that someone picked up and carried away?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...