2012 re-authorization, Male VAWA, children VAWA

[AF-Wife 181]

well the tighter version is stopped by Obama's veto. So until ®victory: it's either the old version or any more liberal version. And again: no single proposal seeking to strengthen families?

Strengthen families? I think you are going a little to far here. The thing you are keep forgetting is that you are

1) not authorized to stay aka illegal

2) not authorized to get a SSN because of point 1)

3) benefits for an illegal alien? No, I don't think so ... You already get more that you should have gotten!

Just my two cents. I am not trying to attack you, but I really don't get how somebody is so ignorant and wants, wants, wants when you are not eligable.

[SingleDad2usc 71]

this topic so far led to conclusion of probably "eligible". the irony is that to continue to drive legally, and to continue to care for the children legally - I'm required to produce evidence that I REQUIRE THERAPY. It's hard to accept that this is what this country has come to - but (as the man below points out) if we don't accept that we have a problem, we can't possibly cure it: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article31810.htm

[Messybrownhair 251]

this topic so far led to conclusion of probably "eligible". the irony is that to continue to drive legally, and to continue to care for the children legally - I'm required to produce evidence that I REQUIRE THERAPY. It's hard to accept that this is what this country has come to - but (as the man below points out) if we don't accept that we have a problem, we can't possibly cure it: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article31810.htm

The problem is you have outstayed your welcome here. The country doesnt owe you anything. :/

[SingleDad2usc 71]

it sure looked like the hero in the above video lost skeptics in about 30 seconds. We'll call it a draw, and stick to VAWA!

[rade2rising 205]

lolz very interesting

[Ihavequestions 419]

this topic so far led to conclusion of probably "eligible". the irony is that to continue to drive legally, and to continue to care for the children legally - I'm required to produce evidence that I REQUIRE THERAPY. It's hard to accept that this is what this country has come to - but (as the man below points out) if we don't accept that we have a problem, we can't possibly cure it: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article31810.htm

No, I believe the conclusion is, as it's been all along, probably NOT "eligible," which is why you're busy manipulating a meeting with child protective services in order to manufacture evidence that would not exist otherwise.

[TBoneTX 45,298]

I can't believe that all this has gone on for 21 pages so far, no man.

[AF-Wife 181]

this topic so far led to conclusion of probably "eligible". the irony is that to continue to drive legally, and to continue to care for the children legally - I'm required to produce evidence that I REQUIRE THERAPY. It's hard to accept that this is what this country has come to - but (as the man below points out) if we don't accept that we have a problem, we can't possibly cure it: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article31810.htm

Since you know, you need therapy ... I'm happy to tell you, that they have therapy in Canada too. Just in case ... If you have to leave the US.

[SingleDad2usc 71]

back to VAWA. A lot of people with families strive for knowledge, not just me. Keep it family-related

[SingleDad2usc 71]

Strengthen families? I think you are going a little to far here. The thing you are keep forgetting is that you are

1) not authorized to stay aka illegal

2) not authorized to get a SSN because of point 1)

3) benefits for an illegal alien? No, I don't think so ... You already get more that you should have gotten!

Just my two cents. I am not trying to attack you, but I really don't get how somebody is so ignorant and wants, wants, wants when you are not eligable.

Totally agree with 1) 2) and 3)

The problem is you have outstayed your welcome here. The country doesnt owe you anything. :/

Totally agree. US only owes to its citizen minors

No, I believe the conclusion is, as it's been all along, probably NOT "eligible," which is why you're busy manipulating a meeting with child protective services in order to manufacture evidence that would not exist otherwise.

I agree: I have to take a stand. Judge ordered it fixed 8 years ago, but ACS has never considered it important

Fact: mother has been "legal" for over 8 years - but is hiding from authorities; father is "illegal", has been doing all the work and only won praises for it from all authorities - but continues to be "illegal"

Heed the lessons from 3-min HBO video above: stop blindly pounding your chest. Don't scare easily. Strive to be informed: that's the only reason everyone needs this forum

[Ihavequestions 419]

I agree: I have to take a stand. Judge ordered it fixed 8 years ago, but ACS has never considered it important

1.) Family court judges can't and don't order permanent residency. You can misinterpret it any way you'd like, but your illegal residency has never been "ordered" to be "fixed" by any judge. Perhaps the judge was ordering that you establish and maintain residency in NYC while your children were in foster care and under the supervision of child protective services, and while you were establishing paternity, but no judge ever "ordered" your illegal status "fixed."

2.) Your illegal residency isn't child protective services concern. Their purpose is to assure children aren't abused/neglected, which they've done for years and years and years for your children - while they have been in your care. Obviously it hasn't been important to you, either, or you would have done something about prior to losing your driving privileges.

Fact: mother has been "legal" for over 8 years - but is hiding from authorities; father is "illegal", has been doing all the work and only won praises for it from all authorities - but continues to be "illegal"

Heed the lessons from 3-min HBO video above: stop blindly pounding your chest. Don't scare easily. Strive to be informed: that's the only reason everyone needs this forum

I don't take civics or national pride lessons from three minute made-for-television sensationalism.

[SingleDad2usc 71]

Here are facts: all educational and medical authorities praised me, 5 separate Judges ruled in my favor, Mayor of the largest city in the nation gave me community Award, Social Security Administration and Administration for Children Services praised me as well. USCIS – working on it; the best thoughtful idea I heard so far: secure the evidence that you require MENTAL THERAPY! That’s to be able to renew driving privileges, following 100,000 miles without an accident or a ticket. That’s to “legally” continue to ably meet all medical and educational needs of two children, following the initial 3,000 days and nights that are now history…

I’m looking at the Polaroid of two pretty scared and sad DOLLS, snapped at the precinct following “legal” mother’s 911 transcript call “I don’t want these children, I want to have fun and move in with my boyfriend”. People who run into us today, ask “And who are THESE children?”

Of course you may let your heart and mind just follow everyone else in that 3-min video... Or you may want to stand up for what's right, like the provocative hero did. One way or another, I view you all as friends!

[AF-Wife 181]

Who cares about a community award ... The fact is nobody ever worked on getting your GC here. None of those judges, the major is just a major ... Nobody! Did you ever ask yourself why?

[Boiler 45,519]

People who run into us today, ask “And who are THESE children?”

Canadian?

Possibly also some unnamed East European Country.

[SingleDad2usc 71]

That's the question I'm kind of asking: what might the system have for a difficult family case like this?

Take children to Canada: NO. I'm reading yesterday's "Office of School Health" note: "your son was feeling dizzy and shivered today at noon. He rested under blanket and felt better. Please send in Sweatshirt+Long pants..."