House Gears Up to Repeal Obamacare

[X Factor 1,112]

House Gears Up to Repeal Obamacare (Again)

Less than two weeks after the Supreme Court upheld the president's health care reform law, the House of Representatives is set to vote to repeal the legislation again in what Democrats have decried as a political show vote while also embracing it as another opportunity to explain the perks of the law to voters.

Lawmakers will begin debating the GOP's proposal to repeal the law Tuesday, with a final vote expected Wednesday afternoon.

To date, the House has voted 30 times to defund, dismantle and repeal the Affordable Care Act. In one of the first acts of the new Republican-controlled House of Representatives 18 months ago, the House first voted to repeal the health care law, January 19, 2011, passing the measure 245-189. At the time, just three House Democrats - Reps. Dan Boren of Oklahoma, Mike McIntyre of North Carolina, and Mike Ross of Arkansas - joined the House GOP in supporting repeal. A month later, repeal failed in the Democrat-controlled Senate 47-51.

Despite an inadequate sum of votes in the Senate to repeal it, House Speaker John Boehner said voting for repeal in the aftermath of the court's decision will only act to strengthen his party's resolve.

Now, rank and file Republicans are lining up behind the speaker to show some backbone.

"I don't think it's symbolic," Rep. Allen West, R-Fla., told ABC Monday evening. "Now that we know that the truth is out there that this is a tax, we need to be able to let the American people know where we stand."

Democrats are using the opportunity to renew support for the law, dismissing the GOP's latest repeal attempt as a "political charade" and "campaign fodder."

Rep. Raul Grijalva, D-Ariz., urged Democrats to stay on offense and trumpet the benefits of the law that are already being realized by voters, unlike the defensive posture congressional Democrats took in the 2010 midterm election.

"We're not going to be defensive or apologetic," Grijalva, co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, declared. "Things need to be improved in the law - we know that - but repeal of it is something that we should all be very aggressive about not only voting against but make it part of the campaign dialogue or debate that goes on for the next four months. I think it's going to help us."

Rep. Rosa DeLauro, who played a chief role in passing the bill, said the GOP's attempt to repeal the law is not just about politics, but also what would be taken away from Americans already enjoying assistance mandated by law.

"It's more than just whether or not they will do it and its politics. It is about the philosophy that is behind it and who they are willing to hurt and whose side they're on. That's what this vote is about," DeLauro, D-Conn., said. "It's making health care affordable for those who have it and for those who do not have it. That is what Republicans do not want to have happen."

But no matter the miniscule odds of successfully repealing the law with the current dynamic of a divided Congress, Republicans remain steadfast in their quest to fulfill a campaign promise that helped propel them into the majority two years ago.

"If you've got orders to take a hill, you're going to keep going until you take the hill," West, R-Fla., explained. "The American people don't want this Patient Protection Affordable Care Act. It's heinous, it's onerous. They want it gone so we as their representatives are going to continue to do what they sent us up here to do which is every way that we possibly can make sure that this bad policy, this bad law is irradiated from our rolls."

My link

[Captain Oates 911]

Bunch of fools wasting the time which is being paid for by the public

They should be required to repay their salaries

They should return to South Carolina and pick on defenseless poor women - they are good at that

[X Factor 1,112]

Come November there is going to be a LOT of very unhappy people.

[Obama 2012 1,714]

Bunch of fools wasting the time which is being paid for by the public

They should be required to repay their salaries

They should return to South Carolina and pick on defenseless poor women - they are good at that

Yeah... Damn those fools for fighting for liberty over tyranny... Damn them!

[Usui Takumi 1,562]

Here's an idea. There are things that both parties agree on...how about they vote on those. Maybe start with extending the tax cuts on the brackets they both agree on?

[Captain Oates 911]

Yeah... Damn those fools for fighting for liberty over tyranny... Damn them!

So a law gets passed by congress - then by the senate- then gets signed by the president

then its reviewed by the Supreme Court and upheld

..and that is your definition of tyranny ?

Your tyranny meter is out of whack pal

perhaps king george got a bum press if that is tyranny

Edited July 10, 2012 by Ashud Cocoa

[Obama 2012 1,714]

So a law gets passed by congress - then by the senate- then gets signed by the president

then its reviewed by the Supreme Court and upheld

..and that is your definition of tyranny ?

Your tyranny meter is out of whack pal

perhaps king george got a bum press if that is tyranny

passed by a lopsided congress. Tyranny of the majority is what it's called.

Democrats call the Republicans partisan while they shoved a tyrannical law down our throats.

Again, I'm amazed at how liberals (well Democrat fake liberals anyway) are for it. A true liberal would see the corporate sellout this is and understand it. However the modern liberal is a blind sheep to the party it would seem, while sitting there and yelling at Republicans for selling out to corporations as well!

[Usui Takumi 1,562]

passed by a lopsided congress. Tyranny of the majority is what it's called.

Democrats call the Republicans partisan while they shoved a tyrannical law down our throats.

Again, I'm amazed at how liberals (well Democrat fake liberals anyway) are for it. A true liberal would see the corporate sellout this is and understand it. However the modern liberal is a blind sheep to the party it would seem, while sitting there and yelling at Republicans for selling out to corporations as well!

The republicans should try to pass an opt out amendment where any individual may opt out of having insurance. These same individuals then must be denied access to any health facility unless they pay in advance.

Edited July 10, 2012 by Sousuke

[Teddy B 17,252]

Here's an idea. There are things that both parties agree on...how about they vote on those. Maybe start with extending the tax cuts on the brackets they both agree on?

I agree. I am in favor of Universal Healthcare, just not this plan, but it's time to move forward. How much longer are the Republicans going to keep spinning their wheels in the mud. I've become more and more frustrated with the Republicans in the last 5 years because of these stall tactics on every issue. If the Republicans insist on repealing the healthcare plan in it's entirity and they don't extend the tax cuts, I am seriously thinking of voting Democrat across the board in Nov. I have been eligible to vote since 1982, I have never voted for a Democrat President, this year could be a first, and it would be solely out of spite.

[X Factor 1,112]

Here's an idea. There are things that both parties agree on...how about they vote on those. Maybe start with extending the tax cuts on the brackets they both agree on?

And then focus on jobs, jobs, jobs, huh guys?

[Dakine10 5,452]

I agree. I am in favor of Universal Healthcare, just not this plan, but it's time to move forward. How much longer are the Republicans going to keep spinning their wheels in the mud. I've become more and more frustrated with the Republicans in the last 5 years because of these stall tactics on every issue. If the Republicans insist on repealing the healthcare plan in it's entirity and they don't extend the tax cuts, I am seriously thinking of voting Democrat across the board in Nov. I have been eligible to vote since 1982, I have never voted for a Democrat President, this year could be a first, and it would be solely out of spite.

If the Republicans get enough votes to be in a position to overturn this law next year, then so be it. That's a fair goal to set, and a fair course of action to take.

The way they are going about it right now, trying to repeal over and over when there's no chance of it happening, it's the political equivalent of banging one's head against the wall. I would rather see legislation introduced to fix some of the worst parts of the bill. It would actually make the same point as trying to repeal it, but at least with the possibility that something constructive could come out of it.

[Captain Oates 911]

passed by a lopsided congress. Tyranny of the majority is what it's called.

Democrats call the Republicans partisan while they shoved a tyrannical law down our throats.

Again, I'm amazed at how liberals (well Democrat fake liberals anyway) are for it. A true liberal would see the corporate sellout this is and understand it. However the modern liberal is a blind sheep to the party it would seem, while sitting there and yelling at Republicans for selling out to corporations as well!

So a majority in Congress and the senate and the president and the supreme court is a "tyranny of the majority"

I will have to remember that next time England loses to world cup 4 to nil