Obama USA's first dictator

[Dakine10 5,452]

I care and I think him calling you out on that was Hilarius. TSKTSK

Hilarius is the correct spelling if you are talking about pope Hilarius. Since that seems oddly out of context here, perhaps the word you are looking for would be hilarious.

Anyway, I'm glad it amuses you, but if you think I was referring to you when I typed "anyone else cares", then apparently you also missed the point of Pooky's post.

Edited June 27, 2012 by Dakine10

[Dakine10 5,452]

Pooky wants us to be afraid!

I wouldn't say I'm afraid, but I am a little uneasy that so many people don't seem to know what a dictator is.

[JohnR! 5,495]

Watch what you say with that "free speech" you treasure so much. Say the wrong thing and you may garner some unwanted official attention.

Alas, free speech is not protected in this or any other private forum for that matter.

Having said that, speech here is not monitored or censored by any government branch, which is not the case in many other countries.

[Harsh_77 718]

Buy ammo!

Dont forget the Gun....

[Pooky 3,782]

Having said that, speech here is not monitored or censored by any government branch, which is not the case in many other countries.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

I wouldn't say I'm afraid, but I am a little uneasy that so many people don't seem to know what a dictator is.

I know what a dicktater is. What I really find amusing here is that so few understand the constitution.

Of all the liberal responses here, I have not had one defending what Obama did. Several post blaming congress, One Blaming Reagan, several regarding my not giving a shat if spell check underlines the word in red or not, and a few rambling posts about censorship.

Liberals can never defend anything on the merits.

P.S. I know how to spell dicktater and I know Obama is not a Dicktater yet.. It was a comparative analogy designed to point out the fact that he is eroding the powers of the Judicial and Legeslative branches and taking actions that would be more in line with an autocratic style of government ... I figured, most of the people in this forum would be intelligent enough to discern the rather obvious analogy , without having to type a book explain it. Obviously I overestimated you.

[JohnR! 5,495]

1340838940[/url]' post='5489113']

. What I really find amusing here is that so few understand the constitution.

That is evidenced by the title of the thread. The quality of the replies posted being a reflexion of the initial thread.

Programmers call it GIGO.

[Dakine10 5,452]

I know what a dicktater is. What I really find amusing here is that so few understand the constitution.

Of all the liberal responses here, I have not had one defending what Obama did. Several post blaming congress, One Blaming Reagan, several regarding my not giving a shat if spell check underlines the word in red or not, and a few rambling posts about censorship.

Liberals can never defend anything on the merits.

P.S. I know how to spell dicktater and I know Obama is not a Dicktater yet.. It was a comparative analogy designed to point out the fact that he is eroding the powers of the Judicial and Legeslative branches and taking actions that would be more in line with an autocratic style of government ... I figured, most of the people in this forum would be intelligent enough to discern the rather obvious analogy , without having to type a book explain it. Obviously I overestimated you.

An analogy can be obvious and stupid at the same time, as proven by your topic. Then you basically responded to everyone who posted anything except a thumbs up with "typical liberal ... blah blah blah". I'm not sure what your expectations were for the course of this thread. Sorry you didn't get all the rah rah's and back slaps you hoped for.

If I was you, I would thank JimVaPhuong for contributing the only substantive posts that support your position and then do the right thing, end your suffering, and let this pointless thread die quickly.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

An analogy can be obvious and stupid at the same time, as proven by your topic. Then you basically responded to everyone who posted anything except a thumbs up with "typical liberal ... blah blah blah". I'm not sure what your expectations were for the course of this thread. Sorry you didn't get all the rah rah's and back slaps you hoped for.

If I was you, I would thank JimVaPhuong for contributing the only substantive posts that support your position and then do the right thing, end your suffering, and let this pointless thread die quickly.

I am not looking for agreement. I am asking any of you to explain to me why, what Obama did is ok, because you named some republicans that did it also. I thoroughly enjoy watching ** socialists glaze completely over and ramble in circles, when you agree with them that "republicans suck also" It is the only defense they have of their mindless policies.

It's the same look you get from a Fundie, when they tell you God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve, and you reply with, well who created Adman and Steve if not God, and how can you claim to be a christian and believe in more than one God ?

[Dakine10 5,452]

I am not looking for agreement. I am asking any of you to explain to me why, what Obama did is ok, because you named some republicans that did it also. I thoroughly enjoy watching ** socialists glaze completely over and ramble in circles, when you agree with them that "republicans suck also" It is the only defense they have of their mindless policies.

It's the same look you get from a Fundie, when they tell you God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve, and you reply with, well who created Adman and Steve if not God, and how can you claim to be a christian and believe in more than one God ?

Or you could just keep going on and on ...

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Or you could just keep going on and on ...

So you agree you can't defend him on any merits of the situation ?

[Dakine10 5,452]

So you agree you can't defend him on any merits of the situation ?

Whether I defend him on the merits or not is not the issue. Whether we approve of what he's doing or not is beside the point. We will each have a chance to address that in November.

I'm disagreeing with your assertion that he is doing something illegal and outside the constitution (and which approaches defacto dictatorship). None of that assertion is true. Neither the deferred action policy or suspending 287(g) is illegal, or unconstitutional. Does it go against the spirit of the law - perhaps. Does it make him a dictator - no.

Unfortunately you started your argument out with fallicy. There was no logical reason for anyone to debate it further. That's why the majority of posts have been either thumbs up or critiques of your spelling ability.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Whether I defend him on the merits or not is not the issue. Whether we approve of what he's doing or not is beside the point. We will each have a chance to address that in November.

I'm disagreeing with your assertion that he is doing something illegal and outside the constitution (and which approaches defacto dictatorship). None of that assertion is true. Neither the deferred action policy or suspending 287(g) is illegal, or unconstitutional. Does it go against the spirit of the law - perhaps. Does it make him a dictator - no.

Unfortunately you started your argument out with fallicy. There was no logical reason for anyone to debate it further. That's why the majority of posts have been either thumbs up or critiques of your spelling ability.

So yo agree he broke the law ? Spelling flames are lame, and I freely admit I make them and will make them However-- See Below.. I just love liberals...

P.S. Mr. Webster Not only did you spell "Fallacy" incorrectly, by modifying it using "out" as an Adverb, it would actually mean I did not use a "Fallacy". De Facto is also two words. Not that I give a shat I am just pointing it out because, you seem to think pointing out typos defends your backwards ####### logic., so i figure that might work for you ? :rofl:

[Dakine10 5,452]

So yo agree he broke the law ?

No I didn't. Please feel free to reread until you comprehend.

P.S. Mr. Webster Not only did you spell "Fallacy" incorrectly, by modifying it using "out" as an Adverb, it would actually mean I did not use a "Fallacy". De Facto is also two words. Not that I give a shat I am just pointing it out because, you seem to think pointing out typos defends your backwards ####### logic., so i figure that might work for you ? :rofl:

Ah-ha, you got me professor. To be fair, I only pointed out one of your mistakes so I'm not sure why all the hostility from one who claims not to care. I would have guessed perhaps a little displaced anger from the realization that your logic failed so completely, but you don't seem to have come to grips with that yet either.