TEXAS DAD BEATS HIS DAUGHTER’S MOLESTER TO DEATH

[SMOKE 1,426]

Finding a half naked man on top of your child might be a reason to attack, and even perhaps attack with such fury that you kill, is to an extent understandable and forgivable.

Dreaming up scenarios in which you can justifiably kill isn't. You need a healthier hobby.

i didn't see where he justified killing. i did see where he justified paying with his own life to protect a child from being raped. you may need a stronger eyeglass prescription.

[natty bumppo 297]

And oh oh... just an FYI, bringing my future children into the discussion again does not even add depth to your argument, it actually lessens it.

so .. until you cross that bridge you're just blowing smoke ....

[SMOKE 1,426]

i don't even know her.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

i don't even know her.

[SMOKE 1,426]

i couldn't resist

[Obama 2012 1,714]

Liberals around here would have seen the little girl being raped and called the police instead of interferring. After all, this is a matter for the cops not some vigilante jerk off.

Of course the little girl later in life would hate her liberal father for standing by and watching, but he did the 'right thing' and all.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Liberals around here would have seen the little girl being raped and called the police instead of interferring.

[natty bumppo 297]

i don't even know her.

do you need too

[Leatherneck 693]

D'awwww Google... Newsflash: that's exactly what I did!

Ummm... why so hung up on the post with the links, dude?

I completely understand the way your logic is working. That is why I said what I said.

I have tried my best to explain my thoughts on this. Stop getting wrinkles over it, okay?

And oh oh... just an FYI, bringing my future children into the discussion again does not even add depth to your argument, it actually lessens it.

Maybe after you've been in a fight and had a child, you'll mature a bit and have a little better prospective. Yes, and your argument has been enlightening, depth, not so much.

Carry on.

[Leatherneck 693]

Finding a half naked man on top of your child might be a reason to attack, and even perhaps attack with such fury that you kill, is to an extent understandable and forgivable.

Dreaming up scenarios in which you can justifiably kill isn't. You need a healthier hobby.

You need better comprehension skills.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

Liberals around here would have seen the little girl being raped and called the police instead of interferring. After all, this is a matter for the cops not some vigilante jerk off.

What a ridiculous statement.

[ready4ONE 5,400]

i didn't see where he justified killing. i did see where he justified paying with his own life to protect a child from being raped. you may need a stronger eyeglass prescription.

Your reading comprehension is flawed, but your support of justifiable homicide is equally well established. Leathernecks post history both in this thread and other threads suggest I am spot on in regards to him needing a new hobby. He both justified the OP killing (and it may well have been, but not based on info in the OP) and put himself into the shoes of the killer by repeatedly encouraging others to see the event from the killers eyes.

More information indicates the killing appears justifiable but I am guessing the Childs trauma was greatly amplified by the killing.

You need better comprehension skills.

Really?

[Obama 2012 1,714]

What a ridiculous statement.

The truth hurts, eh?

[Penny Lane 8,159]

The truth hurts, eh?

You can't state an opinion and announce it as the truth, or as fact. Sorry.

I'm "liberal" and I don't think this father should see a second of jail time or punishment.

There goes your truth. I apologize.

[Leatherneck 693]

Your reading comprehension is flawed, but your support of justifiable homicide is equally well established. Leathernecks post history both in this thread and other threads suggest I am spot on in regards to him needing a new hobby. He both justified the OP killing (and it may well have been, but not based on info in the OP) and put himself into the shoes of the killer by repeatedly encouraging others to see the event from the killers eyes.

More information indicates the killing appears justifiable but I am guessing the Childs trauma was greatly amplified by the killing.

Really?

So who's eyes should the event be seen from, those of the child molester? A child molester invites bodily harm, grave bodily injury and death might result from that bodily harm, then so be it! Most fathers would have a similar reaction to discovering such a scene with his 4 yr old daughter.