AILA involvement

[eagerly 2]

Anybody knows if AILA is involved in discussing AWA case with USCIS recently?

[evli1966 88]

Anybody knows if AILA is involved in discussing AWA case with USCIS recently?

I have not heard nor ready anything.

The last time they inquired USCIS shuffled cases to head off any questions regarding time frames as they do when any officials try to pin down their practices.

USCIS works with in the law

In my opinoin

USCIS use practices which are questionable when it comes to AWA cases or do not practice any sort of transparency for checks and balances.

Which leads to the question of what other practices are questionable.

[eagerly 2]

Are you from Indianapolis Evil? So you are aware of this.... http://newsone.com/2018113/facebook-sex-offenders/

Just curious, this is just the right on being on Facebook and social network sites. am I right? Nothing has been publicized about how immigration's deals with AWA case on marriage to foreign spouse. the statement you said ..."USCIS use practices which are questionable when it comes to AWA cases or do not practice any sort of transparency for checks and balances. Which leads to the question of what other practices are questionable."

I have not heard nor ready anything.

The last time they inquired USCIS shuffled cases to head off any questions regarding time frames as they do when any officials try to pin down their practices.

USCIS works with in the law

In my opinoin

USCIS use practices which are questionable when it comes to AWA cases or do not practice any sort of transparency for checks and balances.

Which leads to the question of what other practices are questionable.

[evli1966 88]

Are you from Indianapolis Evil? So you are aware of this.... http://newsone.com/2...-sex-offenders/

Just curious, this is just the right on being on Facebook and social network sites. am I right? Nothing has been publicized about how immigration's deals with AWA case on marriage to foreign spouse. the statement you said ..."USCIS use practices which are questionable when it comes to AWA cases or do not practice any sort of transparency for checks and balances. Which leads to the question of what other practices are questionable."

I do not live there I am couple hours away.

This is what supporters believe their censorship of all FSO does.

Supporters of the bans say they target repeat offenders such as a Maryland man charged with extorting a 16-year-old girl Indiana girl to perform sexual acts during video chats. He was free on bond when he was accused of doing the same thing to more underage girls.

While I may agree with the ban on repeat offenders or the most dangerous the blanket law covers all i.e. Romeo&Juliet cases, college kid arrested for mooning someone; someone cuaght urniating in public etc.

The truth is less than 4% of all SO are repeat offenders.