Jump to content

19 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

ZmBE1.jpg

That is as sensible as txn's comment. Cudo on the funny pic!

B and J K-1 story

  • April 2004 met online
  • July 16, 2006 Met in person on her birthday in United Arab Emirates
  • August 4, 2006 sent certified mail I-129F packet Neb SC
  • August 9, 2006 NOA1
  • August 21, 2006 received NOA1 in mail
  • October 4, 5, 7, 13 & 17 2006 Touches! 50 day address change... Yes Judith is beautiful, quit staring at her passport photo and approve us!!! Shaming works! LOL
  • October 13, 2006 NOA2! November 2, 2006 NOA2? Huh? NVC already processed and sent us on to Abu Dhabi Consulate!
  • February 12, 2007 Abu Dhabi Interview SUCCESS!!! February 14 Visa in hand!
  • March 6, 2007 she is here!
  • MARCH 14, 2007 WE ARE MARRIED!!!
  • May 5, 2007 Sent AOS/EAD packet
  • May 11, 2007 NOA1 AOS/EAD
  • June 7, 2007 Biometrics appointment
  • June 8, 2007 first post biometrics touch, June 11, next touch...
  • August 1, 2007 AOS Interview! APPROVED!! EAD APPROVED TOO...
  • August 6, 2007 EAD card and Welcome Letter received!
  • August 13, 2007 GREEN CARD received!!! 375 days since mailing the I-129F!

    Remove Conditions:

  • May 1, 2009 first day to file
  • May 9, 2009 mailed I-751 to USCIS CS
Country: Vietnam
Timeline
Posted

The rate is too high and the loopholes are too many. Rates have been stable for a long time. Loopholes are added frequently. Which explains why corporate income tax revenues decrease while corporate income multiplies. So yes, the rate is too high. Should be lowered. And loopholes should be closed. I can see tax credits or deductions for domestic job creation. That makes sense since the feds will then tax the incomes from those jobs. But tax cuts for overseas investments, for shipping jobs offshore. I don't think so. Corporations may negotiate their deals with the countries where the jobs are going. The US treasury should not be burdened for a corporation off-shoring jobs. And yet, they are.

According to what loopholes we are talking about. Some of these so called loopholes are tax breaks if they hire certain ways. Those loopholes being closed can cost jobs going overseas. There also are tax breaks if they buy American products or services. Tax breaks for about anything really.

Texas as some other states do attract businesses by giving companies tax breaks. Tax breaks can be a good thing. Sure the U.S. has been historically a great place to do business but for awhile now our manufacturing has shifted overseas. To me anyway giving these companies tax breaks and lower the tax rate in this country to among the lowest in the world could mean jobs coming back here and prosperity.

Filed: Timeline
Posted
So if the effective rate is 12% and we lower the actual rate to 28% and eliminate loopholes, how is that revenue neutral?

Mathematically challenged? If the marginal tax rate today is 35% and the effective tax rate is 12%, then there are 23% worth of loopholes out there. If you were to lower the marginal rate to 28%, you'd close loopholes worth 7% and you'd end up with the same 12% effective tax rate. Hence, it would be a revenue neutral exercise. Lower rate, fewer loopholes, same effective tax rate.

Should the same be done with personal taxes? Cut out the loopholes and deductions?

Yes, I would support that.

Filed: Timeline
Posted
According to what loopholes we are talking about. Some of these so called loopholes are tax breaks if they hire certain ways. Those loopholes being closed can cost jobs going overseas. There also are tax breaks if they buy American products or services. Tax breaks for about anything really.

Texas as some other states do attract businesses by giving companies tax breaks. Tax breaks can be a good thing. Sure the U.S. has been historically a great place to do business but for awhile now our manufacturing has shifted overseas. To me anyway giving these companies tax breaks and lower the tax rate in this country to among the lowest in the world could mean jobs coming back here and prosperity.

Don't look now but that's exactly what the administration is saying. And the corporate tax reform they are proposing re-focuses tax breaks on American manufacturing and American jobs.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...