Quota for Positives + ??

[luckytxn 2,264]

there was, but it was frequently abused so it was discontinued.

That is why I don't want one.

[Captain Ewok 1,891]

I raised from 15 to 25 ratings per day . I hope that helps.

[TBoneTX 45,308]

Positive inflation, si man! But won't this hose the server?

[luckytxn 2,264]

I raised from 15 to 25 ratings per day . I hope that helps.

Alright. High fives all around.

[Pooky 3,786]

Bring back the -1.

[elmcitymaven 9,712]

Bring back the -1.

I quite agree!

[Rebecca Jo 1,962]

Positive inflation, si man! But won't this hose the server?

Nothing hoses the server quite like Speedy Gonzalez looking for any thread opportunity to post "si man" - ad nauseum.

[MyLittlePony 340]

Bring back the -1

[LeftCoastLady 441]

What point would the -1 serve? If someone is giving bad information, someone will come along and correct them. Considering there's a topic on "Politics & Religion," I'm sure the lion's share of the -1's would be there because it's easier to be anonymous than to state an opinion.

[TBoneTX 45,308]

Nothing hoses the server quite like Speedy Gonzalez looking for any thread opportunity to post "si man" - ad nauseum.

That's OK, RJ; you'll slither away again soon enough, si you man.

[B_J 2,752]

I would love to see the -1 in the upper (actually important) forums. It happens quite often that someone posts information that is blatantly wrong. It would nice to be able to disagree (-1) without having to get into the argument that would soon follow.

[Rebecca Jo 1,962]

I would love to see the -1 in the upper (actually important) forums. It happens quite often that someone posts information that is blatantly wrong. It would nice to be able to disagree (-1) without having to get into the argument that would soon follow.

I always liked the -1 in the uppers for people who gave good info but were rude about it.

[Rebecca Jo 1,962]

That's OK, RJ; you'll slither away again soon enough, si you man.

I'm already pretty much gone, Speedy. VJ doesn't bring out the best in me. Kind of like lying down with dogs and getting fleas.

Edited March 25, 2012 by Rebecca Jo

[luckytxn 2,264]

What point would the -1 serve? If someone is giving bad information, someone will come along and correct them. Considering there's a topic on "Politics & Religion," I'm sure the lion's share of the -1's would be there because it's easier to be anonymous than to state an opinion.

The -1 was here on the site at one time. It was abused heavily. Some people here don't like others so they -minus something just because of personality. If the -minus could serve the purpose of letting others know that the advice was bad and not to show them you hated them then bring it back. I know this site well and the abuse of the -minus is going to be the norm.

[elmcitymaven 9,712]

The -1 was here on the site at one time. It was abused heavily. Some people here don't like others so they -minus something just because of personality. If the -minus could serve the purpose of letting others know that the advice was bad and not to show them you hated them then bring it back. I know this site well and the abuse of the -minus is going to be the norm.

I've just said this in the other thread, but here's my two cents:

• Only available in the upper fora
• A very low daily cap on the number of -1s (2-3 tops)

The +1 is abused in the lower fora. People clamber on to protect those they support, even if they're acting like an a$$.