Jump to content

44 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline
Posted

It is not a matter of support, it is a matter of countering the presumption that all tourists will not return to their own country. Why not wait until the wife is a citizen, and then she can bring your mother-in-law to the US, instead of trying to jump ahead of the process.

She is not trying to bring her here permanently, really she is not.

She only wants her to come for the birth of our baby in 4 months, stay for a while and go home. Her mom has no desire to move here. Is it so unbelievable

Posted

She is not trying to bring her here permanently, really she is not.

She only wants her to come for the birth of our baby in 4 months, stay for a while and go home. Her mom has no desire to move here. Is it so unbelievable

Yep - it was a shock to me. I never imagined that a tourist visa would be so hard. The first time was for my daughter in law to be the maid of honor at our wedding. That refusal went over well with the wife. We just made a decision that we are going to keep having her apply again and again until they get tired of seeing her at the consulate, or the wait time for her F2B visa to become available. Really irks me that they can approve her coming here to live, but will not approve her to visit.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: England
Timeline
Posted

Why not wait until the wife is a citizen, and then she can bring your mother-in-law to the US, instead of trying to jump ahead of the process.

sorry if i misread this but this is the way i understand that statement... the person who only wanted to visit the US is forced in to immigrating at a later date because a tourist visa wasnt granted due to immigrant intent which means that the US ends up with an immigrant that never wanted to be an immigrant???

I-129F SENT............................................08/15/2011

NOA1 TEXT/EMAIL...................................08/22/2011

NOA2 TEXT/EMAIL. NO RFE.....................01/05/2012

NVC RECEIVED......................................01/21/2012

NVC LEFT...............................................01/24/2012

PACKET 3 RECEIVED..............................02/01/2012

PACKET 3 RETURNED.............................02/04/2012

MEDICAL................................................02/17/2012

DS-2001 MAILED.....................................02/23/2012

PACKET 4 RECEIVED..............................03/02/2012

INTERVIEW............................................03/14/2012 APPROVED

POE ATLANTA.........................................04/03/2012

AOS approved 3/29/13 after almost 10 months of waiting. No RFE's and no interview.

Filed: Timeline
Posted (edited)

sorry if i misread this but this is the way i understand that statement... the person who only wanted to visit the US is forced in to immigrating at a later date because a tourist visa wasnt granted due to immigrant intent which means that the US ends up with an immigrant that never wanted to be an immigrant???

That is pretty much it. Even if the tourist never intended to immigrate, without stronger ties to the home country, than the desire to remain in the US with her daughter and newly born granddaughter, you can see why so many tourists end up overstaying.

On the other hand, many elderly immigrants to the US, end up returning back to the home country, out of sheer boredom when being saddled with the care of grandchildren, so both parents can work, not speaking the language, and missing old friends back home.

Edited by ☼
Filed: Timeline
Posted

It is not crazy...it is just the way it is. Countries on the VWP had to meet certain criteria, which as of today, Poland has not met. I am sure you won't be surprised to learn that more than a few folks from Poland have used tourist visas to either work illegally in the US or to use it to gain access to this country and then 'forget' to return....blame them, not our laws. The US of A cannot just dole out tourist visas to everyone (certainly not without an extremely rigorous method of enforcing their departure from the US after a visit, and putting other things in place that would dissuade such activity....)

The main requirement to be in the visa waiver program is to have less than 3% of non immigrant visa applications denied.

So I would say it is the US that decides who is in, rather than those countries meeting the criteria

Filed: Timeline
Posted (edited)

Those travelling from VWP still have to qualify in the same way as those with visas if stopped and questioned. There are many documented instances of VWP travellers being refused entry to the US because of lack of ties to their home country. The US just happens to believe that travellers from VWP countries are less likely to break the rules - the figures you state prove that belief.

Leave it a short time and apply again. I believe each application is without prejudice.

Edited by dustingthestars
Filed: Timeline
Posted

Those travelling from VWP still have to qualify in the same way as those with visas if stopped and questioned. There are many documented instances of VWP travellers being refused entry to the US because of lack of ties to their home country. The US just happens to believe that travellers from VWP countries are less likely to break the rules - the figures you state prove that belief.

Leave it a short time and apply again. I believe each application is without prejudice.

Ok thanks for the advice. It is a shame that the people that cheat the system ruin it for those of us that follow the rules.

Filed: Timeline
Posted

Ok thanks for the advice. It is a shame that the people that cheat the system ruin it for those of us that follow the rules.

Preaching to the choir here! We live in a world where the minority often dictate policy for the majority. Just regroup, see if you can get any other evidence for your MIL, and try again.

Have a look in the Europe and Eurasia forum, which Poland comes under, and see if there are any situations similar to your MIL's. It might give you some new information or some tips on how to make your MIL a better prospect for a non-immigrant visa. (http://www.visajourney.com/forums/forum/95-europe-eurasia-except-the-uk-and-russia/)

Good luck anyway!

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Ukraine
Timeline
Posted

My MIL was denied the first time. SHe is divorced, owns no property and is retired. My wife is her only child. I had my Senator write a letter and I went to Kiev for the second interview. The Officer spent the entire time talking to me and asked my MIL 2 questions. He then said "You seem like an honest guy. You convinced me she will return" and approved the visa. It was only a single entry but when she reapplied they gave her a 5 year multi-entry. Did the Senator letter help? Who knows but I am sure it did not hurt. I know that 15 minutes after the visa was approved the Embassy sent an email to the Senator's office telling him the visa had been approved and that email was forwarded to me. Someone was concerned about what he thought.

Filed: Timeline
Posted

My wife's mom was denied a tourist visa, they say she is retired and has no other family and will stay. Poland is not a high fraud country.

Is there anything we can do at all? She is just coming for a few months when my wife has the baby in 4 months

if i were you better yet file a petition for her i heard it faster to petition a mother less than 6months. i known a lot of people who petition their mom or mother inlaw(parents). give it a shot :thumbs:

The longer it takes to happen the more you'll appreciate it when it does!

Posted

if i were you better yet file a petition for her i heard it faster to petition a mother less than 6months. i known a lot of people who petition their mom or mother inlaw(parents). give it a shot :thumbs:

Your giving poor advice. The OP stated that his MIL doesn't want to live in the US so you go ahead and suggest that the daughter petition for her mother to become a LPR then return to Poland to live her life? That is not the function of a green card and if the OP does as you've suggested then the GC will be revoked. This revocation may have consequences when the MIL truly desires to immigrate to the US.

Posted (edited)

sorry if i misread this but this is the way i understand that statement... the person who only wanted to visit the US is forced in to immigrating at a later date because a tourist visa wasnt granted due to immigrant intent which means that the US ends up with an immigrant that never wanted to be an immigrant???

It is crazy, but yes. Some people from high-fraud countries will never be able to get a tourist visa, due to not having enough evidence to convince the IO that they don't have immigrant intent.

This happened with my co-worker. She is originally from China. Her parents wanted to come and visit her and their grandson in the US and see how they live over here. They were very happy and content with their lives in China and have 2 other adult children and other grandchildren there. They applied many times for tourist visas, but were denied every time.

Eventually my co-worker was able to convince them to try coming over to the US to live and applied for visas for them. They are now greencard holders. Her father is very easy going and doesn't mind living in the US very much, but her mother (much like my co-worker), is more of a social bee and loved being able to walk or get the bus wherever she wanted to go. In California, she can't do that and neither of them feel up to the challenge of driving on US roads since they never even drove much in China and they are older so it would take them a long time to learn the skills and information they would need to pass a driving test. So she is not as happy here and was much more reluctant to come. But they are giving it a shot and know that they can at least go back and visit China once or twice a year, so long as it is not for too long.

OP: I wouldn't give up too easily. Like others have said, at least give it a second shot.

If she is not successful, know that it is not always too bad on a long flight with a young baby. We took our son over to see my family when he was 6 months old, he slept most of the journey to the UK, he was up a fair bit on the return leg, but did well. We went over again when he was 10 months old and that was more of a challenge since he didn't sleep as much then as when he was younger and needed to be entertained more. Also, try and get a bulkhead seat as they usually can attach a travel cot for the baby to be strapped into when sleeping.

Good luck!

Edited by HuffyTheSlayer

Filed: Country: Poland
Timeline
Posted (edited)

Poland is generally a very low fraud country and a relatively low visa-denial rate country (less than 10%) - and we have a perspective of joining WVP. Unfortunately, neither I-134 nor any other assurances on your end will help her. She needs to present her case better and/or show more ties than she did. Other than that, there isn't much that can be done.

Cheers!

Edited by jkb11
Filed: Timeline
Posted

Your giving poor advice. The OP stated that his MIL doesn't want to live in the US so you go ahead and suggest that the daughter petition for her mother to become a LPR then return to Poland to live her life? That is not the function of a green card and if the OP does as you've suggested then the GC will be revoked. This revocation may have consequences when the MIL truly desires to immigrate to the US.

I know someone who has a GC who goes out the country for few months and get back without losing their GC. 1 year without the permit. 2 years ( and not one day more) with the permit. even ask an immigration lawyer will tell you that.

So I guess that kind of scenario will work for his mother in law. Just a thought!!!

http://www.wikilaw3k.org/forum/Immigration/How-long-a-green-card-holder-can-stay-out-of-USA-without-risking-green-card-455267.htm

The longer it takes to happen the more you'll appreciate it when it does!

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...