Trying to get Pregnant!

[Alex+R 0]

nothing more romantic to a man than a woman in the full swing of ovulation

This thread has made me puke a little in my mouth

Indeed. It's amazing that some women actually "want" to get pregnant.

Thats what I was thinking. WEIRD THREAD.

[matako 0]

A woman's pregnancy is the worst thing to her man, for the following reasons:

1.You are now tied with child support if you decide to switch women;

2.Even if you dont switch, the one woman you have now has less time for you, and you now come second;

3.The population of the house (and the planet) is always going up, which means you have to plan everything around more people now.

No sane man should let their women get pregnant because the standard of living goes DOWN DOWN DOWN for the man...and you are now 'caught up' because you cant change your mind any more.....

Edited October 8, 2006 by matako

[MrMrsKnight 0]

Why dont you just resend the old I-129F and replace the name of the women? And just tell them this is a revision of the original I-129F and blame them for not sending you an RFE originally for marrying a woman who would soon change her mind?

If this doesnt work, just look for a domesticated woman here in America which is hard, or just domesticate one for yourself and save yourself the K-1 visa trouble.

A woman's pregnancy is the worst thing to her man, for the following reasons:

1.You are now tied with child support if you decide to switch women;

2.Even if you dont switch, the one woman you have now has less time for you, and you now come second;

3.The population of the house (and the planet) is always going up, which means you have to plan everything around more people now.

No sane man should let their women get pregnant because the standard of living goes DOWN DOWN DOWN for the man...and you are now 'caught up' because you cant change your mind any more.....

What a nice personality you have.

Edited October 8, 2006 by MrMrsKnight

[andrea&roberto 1]

Holy SH**!!! Matako, what is wrong with you!!! You need help.

[matako 0]

Help from pregnancies, i agree.

Holy SH**!!! Matako, what is wrong with you!!! You need help.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Help from pregnancies, i agree.

Holy SH**!!! Matako, what is wrong with you!!! You need help.

Love is a selfless act.

[KiKi 0]

Don't even waste the keystrokes on this.....

[rebeccajo 14]

The only point of this 'plan' that I feel is appropriate for me to comment on is the birth at home bit.

The beginnings of my pregnancy were difficult, but things evened out after a while. I did develop pre-eclampsia and they monitored my blood sugars but that played no part in my delivery.

During delivery (which was protracted) the fetal heart rate of my son plummeted. Rapidly. I had been pushing for 2 or 3 hours and he was not entering the birth canal. I was 'checked' and the nurses glove had a substance on it called 'muconium' - to put it bluntly - baby poop. The stress of delivery had caused my son to 'eliminate' and as the fetal sack was already ruptured, he could literally now drown in his own feces.

A decision was made to do a ceasarean and I was whisked off down the hall. When he was born, a tube was inserted down his throat until all the vile stuff was removed from his lungs. I have it on videotape, believe it or not. It took them several moments to get a good healthy cry out of him.

With a home birth I would have run the risk of not making it to the hospital in time to save his life. The pregnancy was not high risk and there were no reasons to expect a difficult delivery. I had not had a child before - the reason for the problem is one my doctor could only make a guess at. I have a very small bone structure and my pelvis would simply not 'open' the way it does for most women during birth.

There are things that can happen at birth that can not always be predicted. Why risk it?

Edited October 9, 2006 by rebeccajo

[matako 0]

What happened 9 months earlier was worth it, correct?

The only point of this 'plan' that I feel is appropriate for me to comment on is the birth at home bit.

The beginnings of my pregnancy were difficult, but things evened out after a while. I did develop pre-eclampsia and they monitored my blood sugars but that played no part in my delivery.

During delivery (which was protracted) the fetal heart rate of my son plummeted. Rapidly. I had been pushing for 2 or 3 hours and he was not entering the birth canal. I was 'checked' and the nurses glove had a substance on it called 'muconium' - to put it bluntly - baby poop. The stress of delivery had caused my son to 'eliminate' and as the fetal sack was already ruptured, he could literally now drown in his own feces.

A decision was made to do a ceasarean and I was whisked off down the hall. When he was born, a tube was inserted down his throat until all the vile stuff was removed from his lungs. I have it on videotape, believe it or not. It took them several moments to get a good healthy cry out of him.

With a home birth I would have run the risk of not making it to the hospital in time to save his life. The pregnancy was not high risk and there were no reasons to expect a difficult delivery. I had not had a child before - the reason for the problem is one my doctor could only make a guess at. I have a very small bone structure and my pelvis would simply not 'open' the way it does for most women during birth.

There are things that can happen at birth that can not always be predicted. Why risk it?

[Reynaldo 0]

Like my loved one said before, weird thread...

[rebeccajo 14]

Where did the OP go?

[Laveau 67]

Let me just say this one thing, I didn't share with you (VJ Board) all the details about my life, financial situation, immigration situation, and religious views....which would make it difficult for you (VJ members) to judge my life or decision...which in fact, is a RESPONSIBLE, thought out, educated one, that only my husband and I can make; have decided to make, knowing fully our situation, and upcoming challenges that we may willing to face. So, i've gotten enough from this thread now, and will not be reading or participating. Thank you to all those who remained unjudgemental, and neutrally positive.

[CarolineM 0]

What is "neutrally positive?"

If you are positive, you aren't neutral.

FWIW

[Reynaldo 0]

What is "neutrally positive?"

If you are positive, you aren't neutral.

FWIW

Now, why does "neutrally positive" make me think of the GOP?

Well, she didn't like some people's opinions on her thread and just gave up on it.

Edited October 9, 2006 by Reynaldo

[no name 1]

Well, she didn't like some people's opinions on her thread and just gave up on it.

We see a lot of that here, no?

Personally, the OP gave way TMI. Ovulation & sex on a moutaintop!?!? Who cares....