sufficient answer to question 18?

[luis_bici_ 4]

As a response to question 18 I am putting: We first met online in March of 2011 and chatted for a few months. Then, I went to xxx to visit in May of 2011. We spent a lot of time together-including travelling together-during the summer of 2011. We continued our relationship through our engagement (Feb. x, 2012) with visits in Oct., Nov., Dec. of 2011 and in Feb. of 2012. This seems sufficient to me. I will of course be including passport stamps, boarding passes, hotel receipts as evidence of having met in person. Does this seem RFE proof? Thank you.

[Enigma11561 336]

As a response to question 18 I am putting: We first met online in March of 2011 and chatted for a few months. Then, I went to xxx to visit in May of 2011. We spent a lot of time together-including travelling together-during the summer of 2011. We continued our relationship through our engagement (Feb. x, 2012) with visits in Oct., Nov., Dec. of 2011 and in Feb. of 2012. This seems sufficient to me. I will of course be including passport stamps, boarding passes, hotel receipts as evidence of having met in person. Does this seem RFE proof? Thank you.

Even this would be sufficient.

[TBoneTX 45,583]

It will satisfy USCIS, but depending on the consulate where the interview will later occur, you might need a comprehensive statement. What country?

Ah -- Venezuela, from your other thread. Not as bad as some. I'd still consider including a concise one-page statement in more depth, for the benefit of the consulate. Be objective.

Edited March 2, 2012 by TBoneTX

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

Even this would be sufficient.

Mine was two sentences. Probably one sentence too many.

TBone's comment taken under advisement. You do not state the country your fiancee is from, that COULD make a difference at the interview but not for the petition. Soem consulates look for more than a brief a description when they review it.