The people who did the IPCC reports were essentially crooks

[luckytxn 2,265]

Because you say so?

Not at all but I have found lists of scientists that come out for a study and the numbers are way less then this. I also have noticed that the same names keep appearing. At the IPCC the scientists that submitted the reports are way less then the recent scientists that came out against GW lately at the IPCC. Hardly a consensus. If an idiot is trying to say that all scientists that are not against GW specifically are for it then that is ludicrous. I have just been talking with a friend on messenger and he laughed at that. We got our science degrees at the same time.

Look the gig is up. There will still be funding thrown at the GW folks of course but the all important public opinion has seen the light. The politicians will foillow as they are doing. It was a stupid move to try and pull this false science on everyone when the internet is here to show the real facts.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Not at all but I have found lists of scientists that come out for a study and the numbers are way less then this. I also have noticed that the same names keep appearing. At the IPCC the scientists that submitted the reports are way less then the recent scientists that came out against GW lately at the IPCC. Hardly a consensus. If an idiot is trying to say that all scientists that are not against GW specifically are for it then that is ludicrous. I have just been talking with a friend on messenger and he laughed at that. We got our science degrees at the same time.

Look the gig is up. There will still be funding thrown at the GW folks of course but the all important public opinion has seen the light. The politicians will foillow as they are doing. It was a stupid move to try and pull this false science on everyone when the internet is here to show the real facts.

Again, find me one scientific body - national or international - that states that GW is a hoax. Just one. That shouldn't be so hard seeing that you believe that most scientists belive that GW is a hoax. Surely, seeing the majority of scientists not in support of the science of GW, there ought to be one national or international scientific body that stands for what - as per your assertion - most scientists support.

[luckytxn 2,265]

Again, find me one scientific body - national or international - that states that GW is a hoax. Just one. That shouldn't be so hard seeing that you believe that most scientists belive that GW is a hoax. Surely, seeing the majority of scientists not in support of the science of GW, there ought to be one national or international scientific body that stands for what - as per your assertion - most scientists support.

I have many times here and will continue to do so as long as I post here. Every study that has ever been done that supposedly showed that GW is happening I have shown studies that debunked them. Nothing has matched up to what the original studies have shown and the conclusions were wrong. For any real science to be a science they have to be able to be peer reviewed and also new studies have to match up and usually by more than one or two. It has never happened ever.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

I have many times here and will continue to do so as long as I post here. Every study that has ever been done that supposedly showed that GW is happening I have shown studies that debunked them. Nothing has matched up to what the original studies have shown and the conclusions were wrong. For any real science to be a science they have to be able to be peer reviewed and also new studies have to match up and usually by more than one or two. It has never happened ever.

So you confirm that there isn't one. Thanks.

[luckytxn 2,265]

So you confirm that there isn't one. Thanks.

Post a study that proves GW is happening and I promise I will post one that shows GW is not happening.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Post a study that proves GW is happening and I promise I will post one that shows GW is not happening.

Notice that you're changing targets since you can't hit the one you were asked to hit. Second confirmation from you that you can't name a single scientific body - not a single one - to support the World Nut Daily's point of view on Global Warming science. Duly noted.