When the Earth refuses to warm

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

Taken in the context that Bush isn't running for anything, that's a completely meaningless statement. What I actually asked was why you blame Clinton and Obama but not Bush.

To be fair, I am not voting for Clinton or Obama either. Obama has done nothing to prevent global warming, why would I vote for him? Why would you?

[MyLittlePony 340]

Obama has n vote.

[luckytxn 2,264]

Obama has n vote.

What do you mean by 'n' vote?

[MyLittlePony 340]

What do you mean by 'n' vote?

My misspelled is what i famous for NO is what i mean.

[luckytxn 2,264]

My misspelled is what i famous for NO is what i mean.

Really. You can't spell NO?

[Dakine10 5,452]

Obviously I do so to show that the President in charge at the moment can make no difference.

Obama has done nothing to prevent global warming, why would I vote for him? Why would you?

I not sure where you're going with this. You said the president can make no difference in preventing global warming, OK thats a fair point. And then your next post - Obama has done nothing to prevent global warming so you're not voting for him. It would make a more interesting discussion if you could make an argument without resorting to fallacy.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

I not sure where you're going with this. You said the president can make no difference in preventing global warming, OK thats a fair point. And then your next post - Obama has done nothing to prevent global warming so you're not voting for him. It would make a more interesting discussion if you could make an argument without resorting to fallacy.

But I do not need to. If someone who might vote for Obama is an environmental wacko then I point out that Obama has done nothing for the environment and that he will probably even approve the Keystone pipeline after he milks some more campaign funds from the wackos. AND the unions that want it. This makes them mad and maybe they will not vote for him.

Personally I do not care WHY they do not vote for him and will promote any reason they can think of. There is a very large environmental contributor who is currently refusing to crack open her checkbook for him and I like to promote that sort of behavior.

People that would vote for Obama are usually pretty dim bulbs anyway, not too hard to convince. And I believe each person should vote their conscience!

I also would not vote for him because he kills Muslims without a trial, and has not closed Gitmo. PLUS he extended the Bush tax cuts for the RICH! And has now slashed funding for Social Security for the elderly, not to mentiomn infringing on our civil rights with the Patriot Act extension! And WHERE IS MY FREE HEALTH CARE????????

Edited February 20, 2012 by Gary and Alla

[Dakine10 5,452]

But I do not need to. If someone who might vote for Obama is an environmental wacko then I point out that Obama has done nothing for the environment and that he will probably even approve the Keystone pipeline after he milks some more campaign funds from the wackos. AND the unions that want it. This makes them mad and maybe they will not vote for him.

Personally I do not care WHY they do not vote for him and will promote any reason they can think of. There is a very large environmental contributor who is currently refusing to crack open her checkbook for him and I like to promote that sort of behavior.

People that would vote for Obama are usually pretty dim bulbs anyway, not too hard to convince. And I believe each person should vote their conscience!

I also would not vote for him because he kills Muslims without a trial, and has not closed Gitmo. PLUS he extended the Bush tax cuts for the RICH! And has now slashed funding for Social Security for the elderly, not to mentiomn infringing on our civil rights with the Patriot Act extension! And WHERE IS MY FREE HEALTH CARE????????

See much better. Nothing to do with global warming then. But if your goal is to convince people not to vote for Obama it still would be better to try makeing a logical case for it. Also might want to stop calling people dimbulbs too. Insulting people can sway them to the opposite side of the argument on principle. And since the faulty logic won't work on the ones who are not dimbulbs, you really end up with nothing to show for your effort except a bunch of posts saying the same thing over and over.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

See much better. Nothing to do with global warming then. But if your goal is to convince people not to vote for Obama it still would be better to try makeing a logical case for it. Also might want to stop calling people dimbulbs too. Insulting people can sway them to the opposite side of the argument on principle. And since the faulty logic won't work on the ones who are not dimbulbs, you really end up with nothing to show for your effort except a bunch of posts saying the same thing over and over.

Oh heck no, I was annoying dim bulbs about the global warming hoax when Obama was still a community organizer.

[Ban Hammer 13,340]

one post removed. you know better

[Dakine10 5,452]

Oh heck no, I was annoying dim bulbs about the global warming hoax when Obama was still a community organizer.

I know you were. You were annoying a lot more than just dim bulbs. Still, I have my doubts that you actually convinced anyone not to vote for Obama.

[MyLittlePony 340]

one post removed. you know better

But its ok for people to make fun of another spelling right must be the Obama government at work again.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

I know you were. You were annoying a lot more than just dim bulbs. Still, I have my doubts that you actually convinced anyone not to vote for Obama.

I am not a Democrat so I only get to vote once, but I can do my best to influence another or 2 or 10. I have no doubt I can but if you want to have such doubts, that's OK.

I doubt I annoyed anyone that is not a dim bulb.

Edited February 20, 2012 by Gary and Alla

[Dakine10 5,452]

Anyway, while we're here talking about politics, Glacier loss on Kilimanjaro continues unabated

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

Anyway, while we're here talking about politics, Glacier loss on Kilimanjaro continues unabated

What have been the consequences?

How will we put the ice back?

What about other glaciers in other parts of the world? It is "Global" warming after all, right?

Any answers? Oh wait...don't ask you, right?