Jump to content

3 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline
Posted
Rep. Alcee Hastings avoids ethic panel investigation for now

The top Republican and top Democrat on the House Committee on Ethics announced today that the panel will not launch an immediate investigation into allegations of sexual harassment by Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-FL) towards a former employee.

The independent Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) had recommended that the House panel investigate the allegations made by Winsome Packer that Hastings sexually harassed her by making lewd comments to her, by hugging her in inappropriate ways in public and by asking to stay with her on foreign business trips while she was employed at United States Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe and Hastings was co-chair of the panel.

Packer has also filed a federal civil lawsuit against Hastings, the commission and Fred Turner. Turner, a former longtime Hastings aide, was Chief of Staff of the commission from 2007-2011. Packer says Turner retaliated against her after reporting the sexual harassment by giving some of her duties to other staffers.

The Ethics Committee released the OCE report on the Hastings matter which included interviews with both Packer and Hastings. Key witnesses to many of the alleged events refused to be interviewed, however, including Fred Turner. That is one reason the OCE recommended House Ethics investigate since they could get the full story, and force cooperation, by using the committee's subpoena power.

Packer told the OCE investigators that between 2007 and 2010, Hastings made a number of suggestive comments to her. In one instance, Hastings and employees were near a bar at the Marriott Hotel in Vienna, Austria with staffers and he brought up the issue of underwear to the group saying he did not understand how female members of Congress are able to wear the same pair for 16 hours at a time. Ms. Packer told investigators that he then asked her about her underwear wearing habits.

Packer also told investigators that Hastings once told her he did not sleep well, even after sex. And that Hastings had the expectation that he could stay at her place in Vienna when he visited. She also accused Hastings of hugging her inappropriately. She said when she reported the harassment to Fred Turner, Turner did little to stop it.

In his interview with the OCE investigator, Hastings denied the allegations of sexual misconduct though he admitted saying he did not sleep well after sex. Hastings told investigators he's shared that personal information with numerous people. He also admitted to discussing women's underwear near the hotel bar in Vienna, but said he did not ask Ms. Packer about her own underwear and that the conversation was taken out of context.

OCE investigators uncovered an email written by Ms. Packer to Fred Turner in 2007 where she discussed Hastings and told Turner "I have had a crush on him since I first met him." They also found that Packer donated $1000 to Hastings' campaign though he eventually returned the donation since staff cannot donate to their bosses. Packer was also asked about gifts she purchased for Hastings over the years including a shirt. She told investigators that she felt pressured to give gifts since she would not give in to the sexual advances.

The House General Counsel also looked into the matter to make a recommendation to the Justice Department as to whether to provide representation for Rep. Hastings. As did the Office of House Employment Counsel. Both found no evidence backing up Ms. Packer's claims of sexual harassment. The House General Counsel raised the possibility that Packer was trying to promote her book that examines racial tensions on between African Americans and black immigrants. Hastings is an African American and Packer is a black immigrant from Jamaica.

While the House Committee on Ethics will not investigate the matter at this time, chairman Jo Bonner, an Alabama Republican, and ranking member Linda Sanchez, a California Democrat, issued a statement today saying that they are reviewing the matter. So an investigation in the future is not out of the question.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57357329-503544/rep-alcee-hastings-avoids-ethic-panel-investigation-for-now/

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

How winsome was she, huh man?

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline
Posted (edited)

How winsome was she, huh man?

I sleep very well after sex. I usually have to be scraped off the bed. I think he is lying or he never really had sex.

How winsome was she, huh man?

Edited by Gary and Alla

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...