Found an old girlfriend on Freepersonnals.ru

[Ban Hammer 14,468]

And how is that? No nudity so how is it "over-the-top" in your opinion.

it is questionable whether the gal is wearing anything under that, so i've removed it.

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

it is questionable whether the gal is wearing anything under that, so i've removed it.

You never heard of a "G String" ? How long did you have to look at it before you decided you couldn't tell if she was wearing a G String or not? I hope it didn't take up too much of your time. btw who do we send our pics to for pre-approval on here so we don't waste anyone's time?

If I posted a pic of myself on here Charles could you look through my pants and tell if I was wearing any underwear? Or should I make the seam lines more noticeable? This has got to be new low on here.

[Ban Hammer 14,468]

You never heard of a "G String" ? How long did you have to look at it before you decided you couldn't tell if she was wearing a G String or not? I hope it didn't take up too much of your time.

a lot longer than i'd like to admit

btw who do we send our pics to for pre-approval on here so we don't waste anyone's time?

if they are good enough for the tiki room, then probably not to be posted here.

If I posted a pic of myself on here Charles could you look through my pants and tell if I was wearing any underwear? Or should I make the seam lines more noticeable? This has got to be new low on here.

why would you want me to be looking to see if you're wearing underwear or not?

[visaveteran1 33]

a lot longer than i'd like to admit

if they are good enough for the tiki room, then probably not to be posted here.

why would you want me to be looking to see if you're wearing underwear or not?

Maybe you loose your man card on this call Charles?

Anyway, I bet with a bit of Photoshopping and that maid jpeg would satisfy even our local ACLU.

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

a lot longer than i'd like to admit

if they are good enough for the tiki room, then probably not to be posted here.

why would you want me to be looking to see if you're wearing underwear or not?

Leta cut to the chase. There was ZERO nudity in that pic. Now if people are going to "guess" if someone isn't wearing underwear then let's just ban all pics of human beings on here. I mean fair is fair right?

And I have no idea how "The Tiki Room" plays into this. That pic was part of reply and again the pic had no nudity in it.

[visaveteran1 33]

Leta cut to the chase. There was ZERO nudity in that pic. Now if people are going to "guess" if someone isn't wearing underwear then let's just ban all pics of human beings on here. I mean fair is fair right?

And I have no idea how "The Tiki Room" plays into this. That pic was part of reply and again the pic had no nudity in it.

Someone had the YouTube version of "Destination Unknown" posted on here. That was a lot more risque than the maid jpeg. I think what's important is intention. Clearly the intention of the maid pic was adult humor and a follow up to several different posts concerning dishwashers and MIL.

A warning to newer posters. There;s a rat fink feminist boot licking poster that has rejoined us. We ran him out of Dodge a long while ago. Now he's back and looking to make trouble. My advice, ignore his silly azz posts but watch the sex stuff cause he'll rat you out in a heartbeat.

[eekee 182]

Joe Pesci made my baby brother cry once.

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

Actually, you make a great point, Slim. I put that "spank" picture in my signature because a moderator had posted it, despite the fact that it violated the TOS. I was eventually told to remove it from my signature. When I said I would remove it after the moderator in question was held accountable, it was eventually *removed* from my signature by a moderator. I was eventually suspended for putting it back in my signature. Twice.

I'm not afraid to stand up for what I believe. If whyme really wants to take a stand in his belief that his picture doesn't violate TOS, then he should continue to re-post it. Truth to power, I say.

Save it. I already figured what your all about when you recommended to a poster on here that he pay a potential scammer and then you proceeded to berate not only the OP but other posters on that same thread as well. If that isn't a violation of TOS then I don't know what is. Your an easy one to figure out.

[visaveteran1 33]

Cool. Glad you've got me figured out. What you lack in the ability to form a logical argument, you more than make up for in enthusiasm. Congrats!

But I'm being serious when I tell you to stick to your guns. It's my opinion that your picture violated TOS. But that's just me. You have a different take, and I respect your opinion. So have the courage of your convictions. Re-post your picture. If you're in the right, you'll be vindicated.

For what it's worth, I didn't report you. I don't use the reporting system on this site. It sucks.

You "reported him" by raising the issue in the thread. Looks like you won this one. Bet you feel very powerful. Got to get those "RUB good ole boys networkers."

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

Cool. Glad you've got me figured out. What you lack in the ability to form a logical argument, you more than make up for in enthusiasm. Congrats!

But I'm being serious when I tell you to stick to your guns. It's my opinion that your picture violated TOS. But that's just me. You have a different take, and I respect your opinion. So have the courage of your convictions. Re-post your picture. If you're in the right, you'll be vindicated.

For what it's worth, I didn't report you. I don't use the reporting system on this site. It sucks.

Your going to have better luck trying to convince posters on here to pay potential scammers while berating them at the same time then you will have trying to convince me your anything but what you've shown on here in the past 24 hours. Now if you want to keep fckng with me have at it and let the fun begin but I have zero respect for someone like you...and I mean that's a big zero.

[Ban Hammer 14,468]

You "reported him" by raising the issue in the thread.

that's not how the report system works, as vj moderation doesn't read every thread.

there was an actual report on it, which i actioned.

[Empress of Groovy 373]

Someone had the YouTube version of "Destination Unknown" posted on here. That was a lot more risque than the maid jpeg. I think what's important is intention. Clearly the intention of the maid pic was adult humor and a follow up to several different posts concerning dishwashers and MIL.

A warning to newer posters. There;s a rat fink feminist boot licking poster that has rejoined us. We ran him out of Dodge a long while ago. Now he's back and looking to make trouble. My advice, ignore his silly azz posts but watch the sex stuff cause he'll rat you out in a heartbeat.

Deep breaths, VV, deep breaths.

[Susita 175]

So, my view is we should help out those poor moms who can't get what they need at home. In fact, moms, sisters, girl cousins...heck the whole female family needs our help.

I couldn't help but think of this.

Sorry to barge in, but this is such a hot topic right now on VJ.

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

that's not how the report system works, as vj moderation doesn't read every thread.

there was an actual report on it, which i actioned.

Actually it starts with the VJ FB crowd. They decide what should and what shouldn't be posted on this site. Seeing how some regional forums are as exciting as watching paint dry some people take it upon themselves to troll other regional forums to see what they approve of and disapprove of. Life just isn't worth living if you cant sit on your ####### in front of your laptop while eating an entire chocolate cream pie and dispense moral authority over others on this site.

Edited January 19, 2012 by Why_Me

[elmcitymaven 9,712]

This has got to be new low on here.

New lows on VJ (none of which are from you, Why_Me):

• Belittling rape victims
• Intimating that your ex-wife died of cancer when she is actually alive to score a cheap point
• Making fun of people whose relationships ended not for "she's a ######" or "he's an azz" but because things don't work out because that makes you somehow a WINNER at life
• Threatening a mod with violence

Those are just for starters. Objecting to a NSFW image (many of us are actually at work when we're on VJ, taking a break or cruising by while we're on hold) that is not marked NSFW or put in a spoiler -- not a new low.

And for what it's worth, I didn't report it either because I have images blocked.