CO2 is good for agriculture

[Dakine10 5,452]

The problems with your article are too many to list.....overall it is vague and speculative. It lacks an understanding of how the carbon cycle works and makes claims while on the surface may be true, adding CO2 to the ocean will acidify it, but fails to mention that as the ocean warms it tends to release it rather than sinking it. This is the main problem with all the man-made warming babble...it uses true facts to lie. The author would have you believe that warm oceans will become acidic.

You post global warming for dummies...the real reason we are warming is that we are coming out of an ice age...as the planet warms, CO2 is expected to be released from the oceans into the atmosphere...

The last sentence of the article is actually the truth...

The article you posted also contains a lot of speculation. The scientists who support this don't deny the greenhouse effect of rising CO2 but believe rising temperature will be mitigated by other climatic feedback. One of the scientists goes so far as to cite CO2 levels and atmospheric conditions on Venus and Mars.

In an isolated scenario, scientists generally agree that rising CO2 correlates with rising temperature. It's very hard to predict what effect positive and negative feedback will have on temperature until it actually happens. Since there's no real way to test it in a real world model, I would say it's practically all speculation at this point.

[james&olya 1,121]

There has never been a scientific study that CO2 is causing an acceleration of Global change that hasn't been shown to be wrong by others. This is ignored by the very people that want to believe that man is destructive to our global environment. CO2 emissions have actually been pretty stable. Here is what 300 PPM's is if done.

The CO2 was 4.0 percent a hundred years ago. If there really were a 300 PPM increase in the last hundred years then the percent of CO2 is still 4.0 percent. Now if the GW morons really wanted to scare sheep then they should have stated it in parts per billion increase. Now the testing of past CO2 levels is haphazard at best. The testing of temperature differences from hundreds of years ago is also haphazard. They only started to standardize the testing and equipment in the recent past.

Climatologists are nothing but weather people. They are making predictions. Predictions are a guess. Guesses can and often are wrong. Degreed weather forecasters can't even be guaranteed right 24 hours in advance. This makes them on the same level as fortune tellers and palm readers.

The climatologists have found a gold mine in being hired guns to scare people falsely into believing we are doomed They have a vested interest in getting the governments to hand over huge sums of money to them to give what has been proven to be faked science. Why do they fake this science? Well it is so they can show they are relevant and need more money to push the agenda. They want a huge shift in resources to fund a new industry. This green industry is proving very lucrative to wealthy people that get a ton of money thrown at them from our taxes to subsidize. The politicians get their cut by campaign contributions and being able to sit on the boards themselves or family and friends do so at a huge salary or stock that will inflate as more tax monies are shifted to their subsidization. (Gore has become very wealthy by this)

If this was a true science then there would be no need to falsify studies, delete any contrary data, making sure that only other like minded people peer review their work. No science is ever conclusive and never will be. To say that it is showing ignorance. It is an interesting hypotheses and maybe could be looked at more but there needs to be openness and an ability to absorb contrary ideas and thoughts and have a real dialogue.

Remember this.

4.0 percent. Add 300 PPM's and the percentage is still 4.0.

And you vote!

[luckytxn 2,265]

And you vote!

Every election since I was 18.

And know every politician in my area and Ron Paul.

[Bobby+Umit 161]

Some interesting insights on this subject