Now Senate repeals ban on bestiality in military.

[Rattlehead 69]

Touch base with reality, there are over two million people in the armed force, in a pool that large there are no doubt thousands if not tens of thousands who have been involved in Bestiality. (along with every other experience)

Anyone know what percentage of americans have experienced a walk on the "wild side"?

Sure... the military is a bunch of bored rednecks who do nothing but ####### sheep. Tens of thousands of cases of beastiality? And it's an accepted practice? Who is it that needs a reality check?

[Danno 1,228]

Sure... the military is a bunch of bored rednecks who do nothing but ####### sheep. Tens of thousands of cases of beastiality? And it's an accepted practice? Who is it that needs a reality check?

Sorry if you struggle with statistical averages.

Not to shut you down but....... read and weep.

Extent of occurrence

The Kinsey reports controversially rated the percentage of people who had sexual interaction with animals at some point in their lives as 8% for men and 3.6% for women, and claimed it was 40–50 percent in people living near farms,[11] but some later writers dispute the figures, because the study lacked a random sample, and because the prison population was included, causing sampling bias. Martin Duberman has written that it is difficult to get a random sample in sexual research, and that even when Paul Gebhard, Kinsey's research successor, removed prison samples from the figures, he found the figures were not significantly changed.[13]

By 1974, the farm population in the USA had declined by 80 percent compared to 1940, reducing the opportunity to live with animals; Hunt's 1974 study suggests that the demographic changes led to a significant change in reported occurrence. Males in 1974 were 4.9% (1948: 8.3%), and in females in 1974 were 1.9% (1953: 3.6%). Miletski believes this is not a reduction in interest but a reduction in opportunity.[14]

Nancy Friday's 1973 book on female sexuality, My Secret Garden, comprised around 190 fantasies from different women; of these, 23 involve zoophilic activity.[15]

In one study, psychiatric patients were found to have a statistically significant higher prevalence rate (55 percent) of reported bestiality, both actual sexual contacts (45 percent) and sexual fantasy (30 percent) than the control groups of medical in-patients (10 percent) and psychiatric staff (15 percent).[16] Crépault and Couture (1980) reported that 5.3 percent of the men they surveyed have fantasized about sexual activity with an animal during heterosexual intercourse.[17] A 1982 study suggested that 7.5 percent of 186 university students had interacted sexually with an animal.[18]

Sexual fantasies about zoophilic acts can occur in people who do not wish to experience them in real life. Nancy Friday notes that zoophilia as a fantasy may provide an escape from cultural expectations, restrictions, and judgements in regard to sex. A frequency interest in and sexual excitement at watching animals mate is cited as an indicator of latent zoophilia by Massen (1994). Masters (1962) says brothel madames used to stage exhibitions of animals mating, as they found it aroused their clientele, and that it can encourage their clients to engage in bestiality.[19]

Several studies have found that women show stronger vaginal responses to films depicting bonobo copulation than to non-sexual stimuli.[20][21]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bestiality#Extent_of_occurrence

Edited December 4, 2011 by Danno

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Kinsey Report? Masters and Johnson? You have something from the current century, not from Wikipedia?

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Can anyone produce the actual National Defense Authorization Act that Danno's RWN news source is referring to? I won't bother asking Danno directly because for one, he probably doesn't realize what the NDFA is and second, corroborating facts are not his strong suit.

Edited December 4, 2011 by Mister Fancypants

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Here's where you can find the entire text:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:S.1867:

I opened this .pdf version and did a search for bestiality and nothing came up:

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112s1867es/pdf/BILLS-112s1867es.pdf

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Do a google search on repealing of Article 125 and you'll see all kinds of RWN hits regurgitating the same garbage that this budget bill repeals the ban on bestiality, yet look through the document itself and try and find anywhere that is specifically states so.

Here's the general purpose of the bill, which BTW:

To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes.

.....

Now do a google search of Article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ):

(a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration , however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense.

(b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

http://usmilitary.ab...j/blart-125.htm

See the lengths these nutjobs are will to go to try and stop openly gays from serving in the military? Fvcking losers.

Edited December 4, 2011 by Mister Fancypants

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

Do a google search on repealing of Article 125 and you'll see all kinds of RWN hits regurgitating the same garbage that this budget bill repeals the ban on bestiality, yet look through the document itself and try and find anywhere that is specifically states so.

Here's the general purpose of the bill, which BTW:

.....

Now do a google search of Article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ):

http://usmilitary.ab...j/blart-125.htm

See the lengths these nutjobs are will to go to try and stop openly gays from serving in the military? Fvcking losers.

In other words... no butt pirates.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

In other words...

Some people are gay and some people have sex with animals. I believe that is true regardless of which century you get data from, even of it is from Wiki. So what? Regardless what the law says, gay stuff will still happen, so will animal stuff. You think gay people will not have sex if they cannot get married? "Where's my ring!!!!??? NO RING, NO SEX!" Yeah right.

You cannot legislate this stuff, why would you try?

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

Touch base with reality, there are over two million people in the armed force, in a pool that large there are no doubt thousands if not tens of thousands who have been involved in Bestiality. (along with every other experience)

Anyone know what percentage of americans have experienced a walk on the "wild side"?

What difference does it make? They have done it, law or no law.

More interesting would be for you to tell me what percentage will NOW go out and have gay sex or animal sex because now it is "legal" You think more will do it? You think a lot of people were just waiting for the law to change so they could be gay? "Dammit, I can't #### that sheep until they real the law"

be serious.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Here's where you can find the entire text:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:S.1867:

I opened this .pdf version and did a search for bestiality and nothing came up:

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112s1867es/pdf/BILLS-112s1867es.pdf

You had a valid point here, then you lost it with your next post.

174

† S 1867 ES

1 grossly vulgar, obscene, and repugnant to common

2 propriety, and tends to excite sexual desire or de3

prave morals with respect to sexual relations.’’.

4 (d) REPEAL OF SODOMY ARTICLE.—Section 925 of

5 such title (article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military

6 Justice) is repealed.

Edited December 4, 2011 by Crusty Old Perv

[Danno 1,228]

What difference does it make? They have done it, law or no law.

More interesting would be for you to tell me what percentage will NOW go out and have gay sex or animal sex because now it is "legal" You think more will do it? You think a lot of people were just waiting for the law to change so they could be gay? "Dammit, I can't #### that sheep until they real the law"

be serious.

Law has a curbing effect on most people, most people obey the speed limit, not because they agree with it but they don't want to pay the $200 ticket.

Admittedly crimes which are more driven by passion are less curbed by law than say Jay walking but does anyone doubt less murders are committed because of the penalties it carries?

You seem to operating on the premise that sexual perversion is an "on or off" thing, as if there are not varying degrees in people and as if

what society deems acceptable does not play some roll in what often will appear.

For us it's unthinkable to eat human flesh, in societies which find this normal there is no repulsion about it.