Jump to content
Ryan H

Should the law be amended to specifically prohibit adjusting status from a tourist visa and/or the VWP?

  

81 members have voted

  1. 1. Should the law be amended to specifically prohibit adjusting status from a tourist visa and/or the VWP?

    • Yes
      51
    • No
      30


53 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline
Posted

The VWP exists because the residents of the participating countries have a record of NOT coming to the US as a visitor and deciding to stay. And because those nations have a low record of visa fraud at the American consulates in those countries. And because those nations have other favored political status with the United States.

Taking away the ability of VWP/B2 entrants to adjust status would NOT open B2 avenues in other countries.

None the less. Adjusting from status from VWP still seems really shady. I have a hard time imagining there are that many VWP who "suddenly" decide to get married here who had no intention of doing so in the first place. Does it happen? Sure. Often, not a chance.

Trips:

Jan2010 - First Trip, met in person

Jul2010 - Trip two!

Nov2010 - Trip Three, Got engaged :)

Feb2011 - Trip Four. Spring Festival, Lucky Money all around :D

April2011 - Trip Five... Going to the chapel...

July2011 - Trip Six... Honeymoon in Xiamen :D

October2011 - Trip Seven... Beijing and the Great Wall :)

January2012 - Trip Eight... Chinese New Years and Spring Festival! More Lucky Money! :D

April2012 - Trip Nine... Interview?

Paper work for CR1:

28 July 2011 - 20January 2012 - Day 175... USCIS at CSC finally processed our paper work.

30January2012 - NVC 'received' the paperwork

6February2012 - NVC GUZ case number assigned - Attempted to OPTIN to EP.

7February2012 - NVC GZO (EP) case number assigned

8February2012 - 27February Massive delay caused by sending the EP OPTIN email too soon :(

28February2012 - AOS Fee Paid

29February2012 - AOS Fee shows paid, AOS Package sent in

5March2012 - IV Fee shows paid (paid on 3March), IV (DS-230) Package sent in

6March2012 - AOS Rejected due to minor error, corrected version emailed in

8March2012 - Email received indicating AOS correction and DS-230 review in process

9March2012 - Case Complete Email - END NVC PROCESS

15March2012 - Interview Scheduled: 18April2012 (Document turn-in: 17April2012)

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline
Posted

I used to be so against this ....... but after the joke we went thru trying to do everything legally.......if i had it to do over again i would have done it the way many have with out all the #######

just my opinion

sara

I can sympathize with the thought, but with your person being from India I doubt you'd have the option to do it any way but the hard way or do they give B1/B2 visas far more frequently to Indians than I thought?

Trips:

Jan2010 - First Trip, met in person

Jul2010 - Trip two!

Nov2010 - Trip Three, Got engaged :)

Feb2011 - Trip Four. Spring Festival, Lucky Money all around :D

April2011 - Trip Five... Going to the chapel...

July2011 - Trip Six... Honeymoon in Xiamen :D

October2011 - Trip Seven... Beijing and the Great Wall :)

January2012 - Trip Eight... Chinese New Years and Spring Festival! More Lucky Money! :D

April2012 - Trip Nine... Interview?

Paper work for CR1:

28 July 2011 - 20January 2012 - Day 175... USCIS at CSC finally processed our paper work.

30January2012 - NVC 'received' the paperwork

6February2012 - NVC GUZ case number assigned - Attempted to OPTIN to EP.

7February2012 - NVC GZO (EP) case number assigned

8February2012 - 27February Massive delay caused by sending the EP OPTIN email too soon :(

28February2012 - AOS Fee Paid

29February2012 - AOS Fee shows paid, AOS Package sent in

5March2012 - IV Fee shows paid (paid on 3March), IV (DS-230) Package sent in

6March2012 - AOS Rejected due to minor error, corrected version emailed in

8March2012 - Email received indicating AOS correction and DS-230 review in process

9March2012 - Case Complete Email - END NVC PROCESS

15March2012 - Interview Scheduled: 18April2012 (Document turn-in: 17April2012)

Posted (edited)

None the less. Adjusting from status from VWP still seems really shady. I have a hard time imagining there are that many VWP who "suddenly" decide to get married here who had no intention of doing so in the first place. Does it happen? Sure. Often, not a chance.

I disagree.

I think most people, even people who travel a lot internationally, don't have a clue about what it takes to move permanently to another country. How many people that you know think that just because your foreign born spouse is now here in the US, they are automatically a citizen? How many times have you read (right here on VJ) how a person can't believe how complicated our US immigration system is? Do you really think most people have a clue what this system is like?

Sure there are people who intentionally abuse the VWP. But insofar as people marrying and staying, I think a lot of that is just people who are carried away with romance and decide to get married. I don't think they have any kind of damn plan at all as to what they are going to do next.

One of the things my husband hated about the visa process was that it killed the entire spontaneity of love. He said he would have liked to have woken up beside me one morning, said "lets get married" and run out and done it. And then stayed together as husband and wife.

Edited by Rebecca Jo

Our journey together on this earth has come to an end.

I will see you one day again, my love.

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline
Posted

The fact that a British citizen could no longer land in the US on the visa waiver and adjust his/her status would not affect the ability of a Vietnamese citizen to acquire a tourist visa.

That's just sour grapes.

You know, maybe it wouldn't and maybe it would. But it sure is damned easy to say it's just sour grapes when you and/or your special person comes from a favored country and can just hop on a plane and come over and you don't have the government prohibiting them from coming over for months or years. Perhaps you'd have an entirely different view point if you weren't waiting months for an interview and having to be scared to death that they won't be approved and wondering what to do then.

I'm sure you might also look at it differently if you had to go to an interview that they would almost certainly not be approved at just to visit their new family or friends.

Trips:

Jan2010 - First Trip, met in person

Jul2010 - Trip two!

Nov2010 - Trip Three, Got engaged :)

Feb2011 - Trip Four. Spring Festival, Lucky Money all around :D

April2011 - Trip Five... Going to the chapel...

July2011 - Trip Six... Honeymoon in Xiamen :D

October2011 - Trip Seven... Beijing and the Great Wall :)

January2012 - Trip Eight... Chinese New Years and Spring Festival! More Lucky Money! :D

April2012 - Trip Nine... Interview?

Paper work for CR1:

28 July 2011 - 20January 2012 - Day 175... USCIS at CSC finally processed our paper work.

30January2012 - NVC 'received' the paperwork

6February2012 - NVC GUZ case number assigned - Attempted to OPTIN to EP.

7February2012 - NVC GZO (EP) case number assigned

8February2012 - 27February Massive delay caused by sending the EP OPTIN email too soon :(

28February2012 - AOS Fee Paid

29February2012 - AOS Fee shows paid, AOS Package sent in

5March2012 - IV Fee shows paid (paid on 3March), IV (DS-230) Package sent in

6March2012 - AOS Rejected due to minor error, corrected version emailed in

8March2012 - Email received indicating AOS correction and DS-230 review in process

9March2012 - Case Complete Email - END NVC PROCESS

15March2012 - Interview Scheduled: 18April2012 (Document turn-in: 17April2012)

Posted

You know, maybe it wouldn't and maybe it would. But it sure is damned easy to say it's just sour grapes when you and/or your special person comes from a favored country and can just hop on a plane and come over and you don't have the government prohibiting them from coming over for months or years. Perhaps you'd have an entirely different view point if you weren't waiting months for an interview and having to be scared to death that they won't be approved and wondering what to do then.

I'm sure you might also look at it differently if you had to go to an interview that they would almost certainly not be approved at just to visit their new family or friends.

Are you trying to make this personal? Because you shouldn't. The reasons things are tough for some countries is because of their politics. Because some of their citizens by hook or by crook will do anything to get out of those countries.

It isn't my fault or your fault that things are this way.

And you know what those people who get married like that should do? Follow the same damned process the rest of us have to simply because our person isn't from a special country. Why should you and yours get to bypass the system simply because your person can just hop a plane and get married here?

Hating on someone because they aren't going through what you are going through isn't very productive. Life evens itself over the long run for most of us.

Our journey together on this earth has come to an end.

I will see you one day again, my love.

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline
Posted

Are you trying to make this personal? Because you shouldn't. The reasons things are tough for some countries is because of their politics. Because some of their citizens by hook or by crook will do anything to get out of those countries.

It isn't my fault or your fault that things are this way.

Hating on someone because they aren't going through what you are going through isn't very productive. Life evens itself over the long run for most of us.

I'm not trying to make it personal, sorry if it read that way. However, what you seem to be saying is that since certain countries are lucky and can just get on a plane and come over whenever they want, they should also be allowed to just bypass the entire system and just adjust status. Why should they be allowed to do that and us other people must go the long way?

Trips:

Jan2010 - First Trip, met in person

Jul2010 - Trip two!

Nov2010 - Trip Three, Got engaged :)

Feb2011 - Trip Four. Spring Festival, Lucky Money all around :D

April2011 - Trip Five... Going to the chapel...

July2011 - Trip Six... Honeymoon in Xiamen :D

October2011 - Trip Seven... Beijing and the Great Wall :)

January2012 - Trip Eight... Chinese New Years and Spring Festival! More Lucky Money! :D

April2012 - Trip Nine... Interview?

Paper work for CR1:

28 July 2011 - 20January 2012 - Day 175... USCIS at CSC finally processed our paper work.

30January2012 - NVC 'received' the paperwork

6February2012 - NVC GUZ case number assigned - Attempted to OPTIN to EP.

7February2012 - NVC GZO (EP) case number assigned

8February2012 - 27February Massive delay caused by sending the EP OPTIN email too soon :(

28February2012 - AOS Fee Paid

29February2012 - AOS Fee shows paid, AOS Package sent in

5March2012 - IV Fee shows paid (paid on 3March), IV (DS-230) Package sent in

6March2012 - AOS Rejected due to minor error, corrected version emailed in

8March2012 - Email received indicating AOS correction and DS-230 review in process

9March2012 - Case Complete Email - END NVC PROCESS

15March2012 - Interview Scheduled: 18April2012 (Document turn-in: 17April2012)

Posted

I'm not trying to make it personal, sorry if it read that way. However, what you seem to be saying is that since certain countries are lucky and can just get on a plane and come over whenever they want, they should also be allowed to just bypass the entire system and just adjust status. Why should they be allowed to do that and us other people must go the long way?

I don't know the real answer to this. I suspect part of it is rooted in the facts that citizens from VWP nations don't make up a large portion of our immigrant population to begin with - either by consular processing or stateside adjustment.

Our journey together on this earth has come to an end.

I will see you one day again, my love.

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Egypt
Timeline
Posted

I can sympathize with the thought, but with your person being from India I doubt you'd have the option to do it any way but the hard way or do they give B1/B2 visas far more frequently to Indians than I thought?

he had the ability to come to the usa for a medical conference we made the choice to forgo that and go about it the legal way.................

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: England
Timeline
Posted

I agree and disagree. My points refer to VWP because I don't know anything about a B2

- It should be illegal, because immigration laws are there for a purpose just like any other law, you wouldn't go and rob food because you couldn't be bothered to get a job and get money to pay for it, so why are you breaking immigration laws to cut corners to get your loved one here, (####### example but you know what I mean, its breaking the law)

- America is a very desirable country so it needs to protect its boarder and resources.

- Its technically cheating

- If the majority go through the process so should the minority - regardless of where you are from!

- Then it doesn't really bother me because I don't think a government should be allowed to keep people who are in love apart

- I don't know any statistics but I'm sure the percentage of people who actually use the VWP and stay is tiny, other wise the government would do something about it.

- The VWP is there for a reason, the people of these countries do not need to stay in America to better their quality of life, therefore they are trusted more than people from less economically developed countries, for example, apart from being with the love of my life which has improved it 100000000%, my life hasn't actually changed from being in England.

If it bothered America that much, then they would make it illegal so its obviously not that big a deal to them.

Posted

More like current laws should be relaxed so people that pay the legal route arent forced so suffer such long waits and terrible service from USCIS. Ive waited over 2 and half years, so much for the legal route....

07-24-2009 Received NOA1
08-05-2009 Touched
10-02-2009 I-797C for Biometrics Appt
10-26-2009 Biometrics Appt. Completed
05-11-2010 Request for Evidence on both the I129F and I130
07-01-2010 Case Transferred to Vermont Service Center
10-20-2011 Contacted Ombudsman
02-07-2012 Case denied after almost 3 years =(
03-07-2012 Appeal Filed!
01-20-2013 Contacted Ombudsman again...

06-25-2013 EOIR Appeal Review

Visit my blog at http://goo.gl/ON4wG/

atckcgod5n.png

Posted

Personally, I think either adjusting from VWP should be banned (unless there is ample proof of certain extreme circumstances) or anyone who can legally enter the US should be able to adjust status whilst in the US. There are complicated issues surrounding either option, but both are at least better than the current system in that the current system totally contradicts itself.

To be honest, half the rigmarole around K and I visas is silly when that person is able to visit the US already. For example, the current requirement of flu shots for every immigrant is manifestly silly if that person is legally able to contract the flu and then fly to the US on VWP and infect people :B

Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: China
Timeline
Posted (edited)

If you were to change the law specifically prohibiting Adjustment of Status from VWP/B1/B2; you would have to go further than that. It is possible to adjust status if you are here illegally as long as you marry an American. It would require a broad change in policy meaning unless you were here on specific visas(student, work), you would be forced to go back to your home country and then apply no matter what the circumstances. I think the problem is there are enough situations where it is reasonable and humane to allow the non-citizen to adjust status within the US; situations where USC kids or other hardships are involved. The problem is the present system is unfair to some. Changing the law just makes it unfair to others. It wouldn't really solve the issue.

I also think it would just increase the number of people here illegally with no avenue to legal status. I am not sure that is in anyone's best interests.

And I was lucky, I was able to apply DCF so I spent zero time away from wife while doing everything as the system was intended. I recognize the time apart stinks.

Edited by LBeachey
 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...