Concealed weapons permits cross state lines.

[SMOKE 1,426]

I've only looked over that last two pages but I found Allan carefully danced on the edge of the TOS without crossing it.

getting personal & baiting are also TOS violations. thanks for your review.

[Usui Takumi 1,562]

getting personal & baiting are also TOS violations. thanks for your review.

getting personal without an attack is not. Also he has been rather direct towards your horrible posts so I think the baiting here is a non issue.

Edited November 17, 2011 by Sousuke

[SMOKE 1,426]

getting personal without an attack is not. Also he has been rather direct towards your horrible posts so I think the baiting here is a non issue.

yes it is. again...thanks for your review.

[Usui Takumi 1,562]

yes it is. again...thanks for your review.

Then probably 99% of all posts on this site are TOS violations. I can go to any thread and find a personal question, in fact it is necessary in many cases.

[SMOKE 1,426]

Then probably 99% of all posts on this site are TOS violations. I can go to any thread and find a personal question, in fact it is necessary in many cases.

yup..they probably are. were not talking personal questions here lancer..we're talking getting personal with someone. thanks for playing & thanks for your review.

[Usui Takumi 1,562]

yup..they probably are. were not talking personal questions here lancer..we're talking getting personal with someone. thanks for playing & thanks for your review.

if the term "getting personal" is neither a personal attack or asking personal questions...then what are you referring to? It makes no sense.

[SMOKE 1,426]

if the term "getting personal" is neither a personal attack or asking personal questions...then what are you referring to? It makes no sense.

unnecessarily bringing peoples family members into a discussion is getting personal.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

unnecessarily bringing peoples family members into a discussion is getting personal.

Yes it is.

[Usui Takumi 1,562]

unnecessarily bringing peoples family members into a discussion is getting personal.

Its interesting that two posters brought up your mother. Could it be they did so because they assume your mother is likely the same age of the victim? Seems fitting then given the discussion.

[SMOKE 1,426]

Its interesting that two posters brought up your mother. Could it be they did so because they assume your mother is likely the same age of the victim? Seems fitting then given the discussion.

could be. idk. so, what about the wife comment?

Edited November 17, 2011 by SMOKE

[Captain Oates 911]

unnecessarily bringing peoples family members into a discussion is getting personal.

You will find that nothing derogatory was said about your family members - in fact just the opposite - I made the assumption that they were nice people and paragons of virtue and would not approve of your hateful words.

If you think that gives you the right to say those things that I wont even quote, then I do not know how your mind works.

You wont get any pleasure if you come on VJ and say these horrible things about old ladies and call members those disgusting names - and you will spoil it for a lot of other people too

I have many opponents on here who are right wing but I get on with them and they don't call names.

eg Slim is every bit as right wing as you, but is a perfect gentleman. Charles too (ignoring he is a mod) is opposite to me and gives me a good whacking - but is always polite.

I have plenty of opponents on here for political/religious reasons - but none call me obscenities and I don't call them obscenities.

It's a while since we have had someone like you on this board. Anonymity is privilege and not to be abused. If you like calling obscenities then you might be better off posting on youtube where there are plenty of examples

[Usui Takumi 1,562]

could be. idk. so, what about the wife comment?

Did he even say anything remotely negative about your wife? He basically said, I hope your wife doesn't share your views.

[SMOKE 1,426]

blah blah blah, is my halo on straight?

*edited to what i read*

who are trying to BS here alan? you spend your time here doing noting but insulting & berating people that have a different POV than yourself.

[Robert&Karen 264]

Can you expand on that a little? I'm curious.

In my county they require us to bring in the firearms we wish to carry. They are inspected to be sure they are in good repair and serial numbers are ran to ensure proper required registration. We can have three firearms at the most. If you want to add another then you need to drop one of the current ones off the list. While I like the freedom to carry what ever I happen to own, I understand the logic they are using and have no issues with it.

Nevada had something similar, where if you qualified with one revolver then you can carry ANY revolver, but for automatics you needed to have them listed, by serial number, on the permit. You can list as many as you wanted as long as they fit on the permit. There is room for about 20. They have since dropped this requirement and now if you are qualified with one automatic on your license then you can now carry any automatic. I have no idea what they do for single shots, multi-barrel guns, or pumps however. For Utah and Florida they do not list your firearms on the license.

[SMOKE 1,426]

Did he even say anything remotely negative about your wife? He basically said, I hope your wife doesn't share your views.

and my wife needed to be in this discussion because?